Pages:
Author

Topic: Racism in America - page 3. (Read 3589 times)

full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
July 08, 2014, 11:19:18 AM
#32
I can't help but notice that they never complain about all of the white people on welfare, which outnumber blacks by huge numbers.
Why is that?

Most likely because people think US is build by Caucasian and hence it is ok for them to be on welfare while it is not ok for immigrant and black.
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
July 08, 2014, 11:15:33 AM
#31
I can't help but notice that they never complain about all of the white people on welfare, which outnumber blacks by huge numbers.
Why is that?
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
July 07, 2014, 01:24:24 PM
#30
racism will always stay, I mean look at people doing streotypes of an asian owning a liquor store all because of the nationality. like wtf?
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
July 07, 2014, 11:51:05 AM
#29
I cannot count the times when I was in America that I was stopped by cops for driving while black.  One time they were particularly solicitous for the welfare of my wife (who is blonde) while we were having a discussion about Derrida.
When progs change their minds it is called evolving. When cons do it it is called flip-flopping. Go figure .I'll bet you are just a shitty driver.
I have never been stopped in Germany, the Netherlands, the UK, nor here in NZ.  I have been stopped by cops in France as well as the US.   It appears that I am a shitty driver in racist shitholes but not elsewhere.
On this I agree with you.Not sure there is anything sinister about it though. Its really sad that smart policing should include this kinda thing.
Why would you reduce these men, who led a movement that changed the country, to people who could do no more than sell themselves to the person with the most treats. Because you cannot respect that they are intelligent enough to make a decision that was best for them. Do you think these people would, after fighting racists all their lives, now turn around and go to bed with them? You actually think you are smarter than they are, don't you?
Well I have the highest regard for MLK in phase one. Phase one was the assertion of individual rights.Phase two was his downfall. Phase two was the notion that the State had to commit itself to revenge.
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
July 07, 2014, 11:43:04 AM
#28
I cannot count the times when I was in America that I was stopped by cops for driving while black.  One time they were particularly solicitous for the welfare of my wife (who is blonde) while we were having a discussion about Derrida.
When progs change their minds it is called evolving. When cons do it it is called flip-flopping. Go figure .I'll bet you are just a shitty driver.
I have never been stopped in Germany, the Netherlands, the UK, nor here in NZ.  I have been stopped by cops in France as well as the US.   It appears that I am a shitty driver in racist shitholes but not elsewhere.
On this I agree with you.Not sure there is anything sinister about it though. Its really sad that smart policing should include this kinda thing.
Why would you reduce these men, who led a movement that changed the country, to people who could do no more than sell themselves to the person with the most treats. Because you cannot respect that they are intelligent enough to make a decision that was best for them. Do you think these people would, after fighting racists all their lives, now turn around and go to bed with them? You actually think you are smarter than they are, don't you?
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
July 07, 2014, 11:39:44 AM
#27
I cannot count the times when I was in America that I was stopped by cops for driving while black.  One time they were particularly solicitous for the welfare of my wife (who is blonde) while we were having a discussion about Derrida.
When progs change their minds it is called evolving. When cons do it it is called flip-flopping. Go figure .I'll bet you are just a shitty driver.
I have never been stopped in Germany, the Netherlands, the UK, nor here in NZ.  I have been stopped by cops in France as well as the US.   It appears that I am a shitty driver in racist shitholes but not elsewhere.
On this I agree with you.Not sure there is anything sinister about it though. Its really sad that smart policing should include this kinda thing.
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
July 07, 2014, 11:35:41 AM
#26
I cannot count the times when I was in America that I was stopped by cops for driving while black.  One time they were particularly solicitous for the welfare of my wife (who is blonde) while we were having a discussion about Derrida.
When progs change their minds it is called evolving. When cons do it it is called flip-flopping. Go figure .I'll bet you are just a shitty driver.
I have never been stopped in Germany, the Netherlands, the UK, nor here in NZ.  I have been stopped by cops in France as well as the US.   It appears that I am a shitty driver in racist shitholes but not elsewhere.
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
July 07, 2014, 11:01:16 AM
#25
If Republicans did so much for blacks, I wonder why blacks turned their backs on them after the bill was signed. So much so that MLK's father did the invocation as the DNC soon after his death. Maybe they do not know as well as white republicans who are on their side and who are not.
hey were bought by the Democrats who handed them freebies. It didnt take much either.
More likely they were smart enough to see the change in the parties after the signing of the Civil Rights Act. But you won't see it that way Codify because you have no respect for black people. Do you think that a man who raised Dr. King can be so easily bribed that he would side with racists? And turn his back on people who are not racist? Is that what you think of men like Dr. King Sr.?
Sorry, but that is hogwash. They traded their past lives as slaves only to become slaves to a party who knew they had an offer that couldn't be refused.
Maybe in part because of people not being very familiar with 'blacks', but still one has to wonder where the ambitions were.
sr. member
Activity: 994
Merit: 441
July 07, 2014, 10:55:25 AM
#24
If Republicans did so much for blacks, I wonder why blacks turned their backs on them after the bill was signed. So much so that MLK's father did the invocation as the DNC soon after his death. Maybe they do not know as well as white republicans who are on their side and who are not.
hey were bought by the Democrats who handed them freebies. It didnt take much either.
More likely they were smart enough to see the change in the parties after the signing of the Civil Rights Act. But you won't see it that way Codify because you have no respect for black people. Do you think that a man who raised Dr. King can be so easily bribed that he would side with racists? And turn his back on people who are not racist? Is that what you think of men like Dr. King Sr.?
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
July 07, 2014, 10:49:48 AM
#23
If Republicans did so much for blacks, I wonder why blacks turned their backs on them after the bill was signed. So much so that MLK's father did the invocation as the DNC soon after his death. Maybe they do not know as well as white republicans who are on their side and who are not.
hey were bought by the Democrats who handed them freebies. It didnt take much either.
sr. member
Activity: 994
Merit: 441
July 07, 2014, 10:34:19 AM
#22
Hold on, did you just post something she's hoping will be read as an argument against "inter-breeding"?   With...neaderthals?  You cannot make this kind of entertainment up.  Not even for a $300 Las Vegas ticket. 
Thanks for figuring that out. I was wondering in what context one would use Neanderthals to support a point.I think he was just looking for an opening to call one of us "crack ho" .
sr. member
Activity: 994
Merit: 441
July 07, 2014, 10:25:37 AM
#21
If Republicans did so much for blacks, I wonder why blacks turned their backs on them after the bill was signed. So much so that MLK's father did the invocation as the DNC soon after his death. Maybe they do not know as well as white republicans who are on their side and who are not.
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
July 07, 2014, 10:25:15 AM
#20
Hold on, did you just post something she's hoping will be read as an argument against "inter-breeding"?   With...neaderthals?  You cannot make this kind of entertainment up.  Not even for a $300 Las Vegas ticket. 
newbie
Activity: 4
Merit: 100
July 07, 2014, 10:08:21 AM
#19
It is human nature to discriminate and judge, and that in itself is not something that should be called wrong - rather it must be your choices and decisions regarding what the end result is that must be questioned.

Just to nitpick: to discriminate is to act based on a prejudice. You should properly say "to have prejudices is not wrong, to discriminate is wrong" - a sentiment with which I broadly agree.

I also agree that it's natural to have some level of prejudice against people who look different - natural in the sense that the behaviour can be observed in people from all cultures, in young children, and in other species of animal - but 'natural' does not mean 'desirable'. There are many aspects of our 'natural' behaviour that we rightly seek to suppress for our own good, like our instincts for violence, superstition and greed, and I would argue that racial prejudice is certainly one of these traits to be avoided.
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
July 07, 2014, 10:11:09 AM
#19
I cannot count the times when I was in America that I was stopped by cops for driving while black.  One time they were particularly solicitous for the welfare of my wife (who is blonde) while we were having a discussion about Derrida.
When progs change their minds it is called evolving. When cons do it it is called flip-flopping. Go figure .I'll bet you are just a shitty driver.
No figuring required zolace.  Cons don't evolve (unless its backwards, called de-volving) and they don't flip flop.  They just rewrite history, otherwise known as lying.   
Who progressed?Huh??

Neanderthal-human sex bred light skins and infertility

    29 January 2014 by Michael Marshall
    Magazine issue 2954. Subscribe and save
    For similar stories, visit the Neanderthals   , Genetics   and Human Evolution   Topic Guides

IT IS surprising what a little hanky-panky can do. A handful of sexual encounters between humans and Neanderthals made many of us what we are today, affecting both our appearance and our vulnerability to disease. But the genetic legacy left by the Neanderthals also highlights just how different we are from our sister species.

Neanderthals lived in Europe and Asia between about 200,000 and 30,000 years ago. Our species – sometimes dubbed "modern humans" – made it to Eurasia about 65,000 years ago, and so the two species had plenty of time to cosy up. In 2010, geneticists discovered that they had been very close neighbours indeed. They sequenced a Neanderthal genome and discovered it carried genes that also appear in the genomes of people of European and Asian descent: our species must have interbred with Neanderthals.

Now, by studying Neanderthal genes in people alive today, researchers are beginning to appreciate how that interbreeding influenced our species.

In one new study of 1000 human genomes, Sriram Sankararaman and David Reich of Harvard Medical School and colleagues found that Neanderthal DNA is most common in regions of the genome with the greatest genetic variability, making them a prime target for natural selection. While Neanderthal DNA may make up only 1.6 to 1.8 per cent of the Eurasian genome, it punches above its weight in terms of biological impact, says Reich (Nature, DOI: 10.1038/nature12961).

Joshua Akey and Ben Vernot of the University of Washington in Seattle have analysed the Neanderthal DNA in a further 665 humans (Science, DOI: 10.1126/science.1245938). Both their study and the Harvard one found a hotspot of Neanderthal ancestry in genes relating to keratin, a fibrous protein found in our hair, skin and nails.

One of the genes, BNC2, is involved in skin pigmentation. That implies that Eurasians owe their paler skins partly to Neanderthals. Light skin is an advantage at higher latitudes because it is more efficient at generating vitamin D from sunlight, so Neanderthal DNA may have helped modern humans to adapt to life outside Africa.

If so, the adaptation took thousands of years to become universal. A third study published this week describes a DNA analysis of one person who lived in Stone Age Europe about 7000 years ago – 40,000 years after any Neanderthal interbreeding. His genes suggest his skin was dark (Nature, doi.org/q74). It may be that the Neanderthal keratin affected early Eurasians' hair instead, perhaps straightening it.

Not all of the Neanderthal genes are beneficial. Sankararaman and Reich found that our Neanderthal inheritance includes several genes that make us susceptible to diseases including type 2 diabetes, lupus and Crohn's disease.

Some of the genes, meanwhile, appear to have led to fertility problems. For instance, Sankararaman found that the X chromosome is almost devoid of Neanderthal DNA. This suggests that most Neanderthal DNA that wound up on the X chromosome made the bearer less fertile – a common occurrence when related but distinct species interbreed – and so it quickly disappeared from the human gene pool. "Neanderthal alleles were swept away," says Sankararaman.

"This underlines that modern humans and Neanderthals are indeed different species," says Fred Spoor of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany, who was not involved in any of the studies.

The genetic evidence further backs this up. Neanderthal DNA is irregularly spaced through the modern human genome rather than being fully mixed. That implies that interbreeding occurred very rarely. Sankararaman estimates it may have happened just four times.

"But these relatively few matings obviously were an important event in the history of non-Africans," says Reich.

This article appeared in print under the headline "Neanderthal sex, the aftermath"
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
July 07, 2014, 10:00:50 AM
#18
stop racism and make love :-)
yeah , this is the solution.......
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
July 07, 2014, 10:00:18 AM
#17
I cannot count the times when I was in America that I was stopped by cops for driving while black.  One time they were particularly solicitous for the welfare of my wife (who is blonde) while we were having a discussion about Derrida.
When progs change their minds it is called evolving. When cons do it it is called flip-flopping. Go figure .I'll bet you are just a shitty driver.
No figuring required zolace.  Cons don't evolve (unless its backwards, called de-volving) and they don't flip flop.  They just rewrite history, otherwise known as lying.   
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
July 07, 2014, 09:55:35 AM
#16
I cannot count the times when I was in America that I was stopped by cops for driving while black.  One time they were particularly solicitous for the welfare of my wife (who is blonde) while we were having a discussion about Derrida.
When progs change their minds it is called evolving. When cons do it it is called flip-flopping. Go figure .I'll bet you are just a shitty driver.
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
July 07, 2014, 09:53:58 AM
#15
I cannot count the times when I was in America that I was stopped by cops for driving while black.  One time they were particularly solicitous for the welfare of my wife (who is blonde) while we were having a discussion about Derrida.
legendary
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1132
July 07, 2014, 03:22:33 AM
#14
I do not izameriko but looked like it on Discovery about your Nazis. It's a nightmare and laughter. Neo-Nazis are real freaks. Then he was surprised to learn that in America is was his neo-Nazi movement after the war in 1950x
Pages:
Jump to: