kneim what i meant was there are others who can answer you about your question about master chain. there should be a handful of people who have read the whitepaper and know about the stuff. im too lazy to readup now.
regarding the distribution of the remaining coins, i tend to agree we should stick with the faucet after the coinswap because a good part of the interest given to mrai by users is from the faucet distribution.
As I understood the faucet could be misused by bots, operated by technically skilled people. This is the opposite of humanity.
there were measures put in place, like for example IP detection. i dunno if this measure could be perfected so it could no longer be circumvented to be gamed by bot users.
what really happened was those with btc to spare hired people who wanted a quick buck and bought their farmed coins cheap. i think its okay since it is voluntary trade.
This solution is too technically. Think of people that cannot use computers, or even write, have no technical skills (also known as humans). The admin of the subchains of each person in this world should be able to be delegated to a group of specialist having fun on technics and finance.
Example: A not too small group of natural people (dezentralisation), everyone with an own existing subchain, commiting on an existing human or new born child, can create a subchain for him/her. On every week, that this target person is commiting it's existance, it is getting some coins on it's chain (similar to PoS?). (This example is a very rudimentary one, I cannot say if this is right or even solvable).
Whenever one individual person is found using more than one subchain, there should come penalties into account, that makes this theft too expensive to try.