Pages:
Author

Topic: Rally? (Read 2659 times)

donator
Activity: 2772
Merit: 1019
April 19, 2013, 11:59:54 AM
#26
Not sure if this is joke or not: http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-957375

Interesting if true. Imagine 5 years down the road and Zimbabwe using Bitcoin together with a bunch of other formerly impoverished nations. They all enjoy lively economy, stability and persecuted elsewhere bitcoiners relocate en masse to Africa. (as someone else "predicted" somewhere in other thread).  Grin



It would be a brilliant move, but maybe only on first sight.

Consider Lybia: Gadhafi wanted to make a Gold Dinar togetehr with other African countries. What did he and his country get for trying that? Nato (imf? world bank?) bombed them to shit, killed Gaddhafi, took the gold. Western media spun it as "protecting civilians", lol. I know, I know, take off the tinfoil hat. But it makes sense, does it not?




I never heard this theory. Any idea where i can read more about it?

I think I saw someone talk about it on Russia Today a while back (might've been that Webster Tarpley character). John Perkins also talks about it:

According to the IMF, Libya’s Central Bank is 100% state owned. The IMF estimates that the bank has nearly 144 tons of gold in its vaults. It is significant that in the months running up to the UN resolution that allowed the US and its allies to send troops into Libya, Muammar al-Qaddafi was openly advocating the creation of a new currency that would rival the dollar and the euro. In fact, he called upon African and Muslim nations to join an alliance that would make this new currency, the gold dinar, their primary form of money and foreign exchange. They would sell oil and other resources to the US and the rest of the world only for gold dinars.

It makes sense for the US: protecting the USD while at the same time acquiring some badly needed gold (many countries want their gold back and it's quite likely (if not apparent), that not all the gold that is stored in the name of these countries in New York or whereever is actuall available (as in: there)).
member
Activity: 224
Merit: 10
April 18, 2013, 03:05:12 PM
#25
Not sure if this is joke or not: http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-957375

Interesting if true. Imagine 5 years down the road and Zimbabwe using Bitcoin together with a bunch of other formerly impoverished nations. They all enjoy lively economy, stability and persecuted elsewhere bitcoiners relocate en masse to Africa. (as someone else "predicted" somewhere in other thread).  Grin



It would be a brilliant move, but maybe only on first sight.

Consider Lybia: Gadhafi wanted to make a Gold Dinar togetehr with other African countries. What did he and his country get for trying that? Nato (imf? world bank?) bombed them to shit, killed Gaddhafi, took the gold. Western media spun it as "protecting civilians", lol. I know, I know, take off the tinfoil hat. But it makes sense, does it not?




I never heard this theory. Any idea where i can read more about it?
donator
Activity: 2772
Merit: 1019
April 18, 2013, 03:03:22 PM
#24
Not sure if this is joke or not: http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-957375

Interesting if true. Imagine 5 years down the road and Zimbabwe using Bitcoin together with a bunch of other formerly impoverished nations. They all enjoy lively economy, stability and persecuted elsewhere bitcoiners relocate en masse to Africa. (as someone else "predicted" somewhere in other thread).  Grin



It would be a brilliant move, but maybe only on first sight.

Consider Lybia: Gadhafi wanted to make a Gold Dinar togetehr with other African countries. What did he and his country get for trying that? Nato (imf? world bank?) bombed them to shit, killed Gaddhafi, took the gold. Western media spun it as "protecting civilians", lol. I know, I know, take off the tinfoil hat. But it makes sense, does it not?


full member
Activity: 143
Merit: 100
April 17, 2013, 09:56:58 AM
#23
Perhaps they meant zimcoins?

jokes apart, I know some bitcoin advocates are trying to convice some smaller nations to declare BTC as their official currency. I heard they were looking for small islands in the pacific, but Africa could be an option. This would prevent any attempt to declare bitcoins illegal.

Cheers!

legendary
Activity: 3066
Merit: 1147
The revolution will be monetized!
April 17, 2013, 09:34:50 AM
#22
We all know Robert Mugabe is a financial genius!   Grin
full member
Activity: 188
Merit: 108
April 17, 2013, 09:34:32 AM
#21
It doesn't make any sense to use BTC in Africa as BTC requires stable Internet to operate.

Nobody thought of that?

are you under some impression that the entire continent of africa is tribal bushmen? Tongue

Looking at the stats at: http://www.netindex.com/

I came to conclusion it's not good. Most African countries have low single digits download speed.

And that is average which will be probably too far from median for which I expect is no connectivity at all.
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
April 17, 2013, 09:31:45 AM
#20
Wrong title. Not Rally? R A L L Y !!!


But seriously, it takes time work over all the emotionally damaged speculators.

That's why we have a new shipment everyday!
New speculators emotionally intact!  Grin
legendary
Activity: 2492
Merit: 1491
LEALANA Bitcoin Grim Reaper
April 17, 2013, 09:28:46 AM
#19
Wrong title. Not Rally? R A L L Y !!!


But seriously, it takes time work over all the emotionally damaged speculators.

Yes I know, taking money from damaged speculators is time consuming  Wink
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
this statement is false
April 17, 2013, 09:25:06 AM
#18
It doesn't make any sense to use BTC in Africa as BTC requires stable Internet to operate.

Nobody thought of that?

are you under some impression that the entire continent of africa is tribal bushmen? Tongue
full member
Activity: 188
Merit: 108
April 17, 2013, 09:21:21 AM
#17
It doesn't make any sense to use BTC in Africa as BTC requires stable Internet to operate.

Nobody thought of that?
donator
Activity: 2772
Merit: 1019
April 17, 2013, 07:46:29 AM
#16
Not sure if this is joke or not: http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-957375

lol good prank. Smiley Would be more beliavable if they used a technologically advanced nation, i wonder what % of zimbabwe has regular access to the net...

In Africa It's used some forms of money based on mobiles and sms I think.. So It shouldn't be a big change anyway.

In Africa It's used some forms of money payment network (mpesa) based on mobiles and sms I think.. So It shouldn't be a big change anyway.
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
April 17, 2013, 07:18:13 AM
#15
Not sure if this is joke or not: http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-957375

lol good prank. Smiley Would be more beliavable if they used a technologically advanced nation, i wonder what % of zimbabwe has regular access to the net...

In Africa It's used some forms of money based on mobiles and sms I think.. So It shouldn't be a big change anyway.
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
April 17, 2013, 07:17:15 AM
#14
Don't get me wrong, Bitcoin is a really, really good idea. But why would a country adopt a currency that could be controlled by any of a number of people holding a significant portion of it (like the Winkleviis)?


1) You miss the point - if an entire country adopted it, the Winklevii and the early adopter/big holders would have very little power any more. In a low liquidity market the big players have some control but even now we're seeing that it takes bigger and bigger sells to do ANYTHING to the market.

2) You're right, they wouldn't adopt a currency that can be controlled by the people holding it - they'd rather adopt a currency that's controlled by their central banksters and organized financial crime  Grin Grin Grin
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1008
If you want to walk on water, get out of the boat
April 17, 2013, 07:07:51 AM
#13
In my opinion it is false

Posted by BitCoinSachs wich uploaded only 1 report: this one. Totally fake.
legendary
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1001
April 17, 2013, 07:05:23 AM
#12
Not even Mugabe could be that dumb. This is a joke.

Don't get me wrong, Bitcoin is a really, really good idea. But why would a country adopt a currency that could be controlled by any of a number of people holding a significant portion of it (like the Winkleviis)?
full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
April 17, 2013, 06:48:14 AM
#11
Not sure if this is joke or not: http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-957375

lol good prank. Smiley Would be more beliavable if they used a technologically advanced nation, i wonder what % of zimbabwe has regular access to the net...
hero member
Activity: 634
Merit: 500
April 17, 2013, 03:55:13 AM
#10
If true: fantastic news for Zimbabwe.
If false: only for now.
hero member
Activity: 602
Merit: 508
Firstbits: 1waspoza
April 17, 2013, 03:54:35 AM
#9
Pretty sure iReport is user-submitted articles.
It sure is.

Damn, thought it's too good to be true.
member
Activity: 224
Merit: 10
April 17, 2013, 03:41:01 AM
#8
Yeah and it was posted yesterday. What happened with the afternoon conference which would confirm everything? Looks like a late april joke.
full member
Activity: 218
Merit: 100
Firstbits: 19e3fc
April 17, 2013, 03:39:46 AM
#7
Pretty sure iReport is user-submitted articles.
It sure is.
Pages:
Jump to: