Topic: Rambotnic (Read 446 times)

No I wasn't you fucking Idiot!!!??  I could give any fucks about a free raffle. I just thought it was funny that you had no idea about import taxes.

Good luck, sir!

oh I am a crazy traffic policeman from a 3rd world country. I take bribes for $10 all day long and now have to wank off my cousin Nicolai every Thursday for 87 more weeks as he had to lend me the $100 for import duties. I think I am a big man but really my wife beats me and pegs me every day, oh I love every rhursday though

Look it is very simple.

1. You initially claimed he was claiming the work as his own.  This was proven false.
2. You consider his posts as shit posting - I have demonstrated that is not essentially true by any criteria I have noticed is widely accepted and I don't think others will share your opinion. If you ban every person whom posts to his standard you can start banning a huge proportion of the board that actually does nothing against the rules and does not harm directly anyone else. He is certainly not a shit post scamming spammer who have ruined the alt board. You do not have the right to evaluate his posts alone and decide he is not worthy of being a member.
3. You then admit he was not claiming the work as his own.
4. You said you would expect other members (staff or dt) to disagree with you if you were wrong. -- They have. You still  do not listen.

I find it more than strange that you have reviewed all of the observable evidence that I provided on the other post and still insist he deserves a perma ban? That is a very serious punishment.


Now I notice you don't want to  mud sling but seem very interested to know why I am sticking up for what is clearly a fair and correct decision by DS?  why would the motive of my interest change the observable events?

 Let's say i am discovered to be the actual devil or just a person whom likes to cause trouble for no reason. How could I hack into the board or go back in time and change what people can observe has taken place. It does not matter who presents observable events because there is no trust required. I am asking for no trust I am asking people review the observable events and make their own minds up.

What part specifically interests you, and what would you like to know? Am I his father? the devil?  this is a tactic a lot of people resort to to not deal with observable events and not one people should be diverted by.

It is very simple I have always done so and especially when people in perceived power seem to be picking on those of perceived lesser power for no good reason.

I was bored browsing this board and noticed his thread. I would do the same for anyone.

Someone trying to help others and getting banned for that or red trust is something I would always comment on and try to change.

I agree though I find it strange this is still ongoing. If you will not remove it there is nothing more to be done at this point. Although historically I believe it will turn out to be a mistake on your part to leave it there and will not be one of your finest decisions.

People can only make so many bad decisions before the credibility of that person is reduced dramatically.

Well DarkStar_'s explanation was that this is a matter for the mods to take care of and not DT--and in fact DarkStar_ was one of the members who reported Rambotnic's post to begin with and I assume he thought it was plagiarism.  As I said, while still respecting DarkStar_, I have to disagree with his actions here.  I agree that moderators should have dealt with the report differently than the way they did, but sometimes mods fail to act or make mistakes.

Aside from the plagiarism issue, I can't get past my feeling that Rambotnic is a member who contributes nothing.  He think's he's helpful, but I see his posts as giant walls of nonsense.  Not slinging any mud here, but I'm also wondering why cryptohunter is defending Rambotnic so vigorously.  The neg I left him was appropriately given and the forum would be a much better place without members like him.  DarkStar_ already left a counter positive, so I don't know why this is still being discussed.

Run baby..........

1. it is clear that you will not present observable grounds for your argument.
2. thinks it is okay to say that I have shady motives and other spurious attacks on persons and deflection tactics to try to decredit other persons  character - - but not willing to accept reasonable conclusions based on his trust feedback and previous post history. Again observable on this thread/board. I mean complaining about behaviour you yourself introduce first into a thread is the definition of HYPOCRISY.
3. Now gone back on plagiarism or not (prime crux of argument)? but now invents other behaviour worth of perm ban but will not provide evidence.
4. Destruction of the private property of gekos.  That could be a balloon full of innocent investors dreams using certain escrows. Evil kitty.
5. Has no memory of being a dash supporter... has no memory of later saying it was a scam. (not that that is that relevant only to counter his argument he is never wrong)

seems legit. lol

I have nothing personal against you all things considered ( i have not read in detail all the basis of your negative feedback )however I can not allow you to persecute a person I see no evidence provided deserves such treatment by claiming there is such evidence.

Please remain quiet if you are unwilling/unable to bring evidence to substantiate your opinions or show any logical and reasonable trail of thought that others that are reasonable and fair could follow and agree with. Anything else requires trust in you and your personal moral compass which I don't expect many would be comfortable with at this point.

Lauda should thank god that scams are not moderated on this forum and they are not in the rules
Or he/she would be banned long long time ago if the scams were moderated and deserved ban

Here you go again. Do you think that someone like you can fool me with these pajeet rehashed tactics[1]? Retrospective of your actions:

• Call for "observable facts", not personal matters. Then you naturally try to introduce information related to the latter. Here's a quick breakdown of your failed attempt:
• • Introduce poison: Indirectly state that I'm "one of the most devious scammers " in your previous post by referring to statements made by others[2].
  • Switch: Offer help to clear accusations, emphasizing on their quantity (none of which are true, which makes the quantity irrelevant), i.e. things which are untrue to begin with.
  • Introduce yet more poison about my character by bringing up ghosts (predictions?) that are not even remembered by their author.

---

If you were even remotely objective, non-selective (i.e. not a hypocrite), and stood behind your words, you would have been defending those that were actually mistreated a long time ago. This is assuming that you have good judgement, but given the kind of person that you are defending after they were clearly caught doing something that is against the rules, it is clear that you do not.

---

[1] You need a lot of soy IV before you can play something like this on me mr. leftist NPC.
[2] Cute deflection.



I'll let myself out after this destruction; enough indulging 'geckos for one day. You can continue to slander my name without me.
Cheerio.

My activity, my posts, my trade history clearly enough prove i can be trusted or not So far i received red trust only from exposed scammers and people who harm this community.
The only person who is not scammer and posted red trust for me is Pharmacist.
You Lauda are shit poster, proven scammer and person who threat people.
TMAN is just the same as you
And about owlcatz, he is just jealous person who attack people because he didn't won a free giveaway ?
And he attack me because in that time i didn't had enough money (450$ worth of customs fees) to collect my winnings and also i didn't feel right to win FREE giveaway and PAY something i won FREE ?
Every single statement from Lauda, TMAN and owlcatz just prove that we need change on this forum and the first step was taken from your DT removal.
No you are not always right  Lauda, in fact, in most cases you act and write only when you can earn something from that but never help people around
Maybe somewhere in the past you help people but you can't lay on old laurels.
You became more shit poster than everyone else around and defending your own group of exposed scammers.
If you calling shit posters people who trying to protect people, you just prove my words that you are criminal and helping people is nothing more than shits
I don't really care bout scammers opinions like yours,tman and owlcatz, the whole community already know you all
Well not everyone know me, but the people who wanted to check my post history and my trade history, at least i am always honest, trying to protect people and using escrow
If the average user follow those lines to help people and always use escrow, we would have the best forum on the world
I can't wait the time till you, tman and owlcatz, will magically disappear from this forum like many exposed scammers did already

So now its plagiarism or no plagiarism he just has to be banned??? what other behaviour deserving a perm ban do you mean?

Please provide basis for your statements. I see someone trying to avoid discussing the presented facts.


Please provide what I have asked for. Without it your argument is a non-starter.

Please go back and read my posts.

Let's save the personal scrutiny for later. I am certainly open to that stage coming next if you wish.

For now read my posts, present your argument clearly with observable events/facts.

No more personal remarks discuss the observable events only.

I am totally down for a personal scrutiny session later on. I will look forward to examining all the evidence with you and help you clear you negative trust. Even you deserve a chance to be declared innocent if you are. However having read some of the threads about you we have a long road ahead my friend.

You have been wrong on some very big projects before. Why deny which is observable in the public domain.

You switch from inducing random, irrelevant information to trying to defend cheaters too incoherently. It is due to this that your questionable motivations and fake coherent arguments easily become obvious.

---

Plagiarism or no plagiarism, Darkstar's counter or not, rambotnic can't be trusted due to his behavior anyways. Oh look, I was right again unlike the leftist well-poisoner. Surprising.

LOL you can't trust me. Motivated by something shady - - lol take a look at your feedback. You are generally thought of as one of the most devious scammers on this board according to many threads here and your trust score.

Your argument does not hold water.

Read my post and take your time to reply. You seem upset and rushing your replies and constantly editing your posts.

LOL mr ad hominem.

Now take a deep breath and simply provide a simple basis for your frantic posting of gibberish.

You must realise that as previous dash enabler and promoter can not be taken at face value however much you repent for this.

You are only making yourself look desperate and pathetic by trying to divert from the topic here.

I would also imagine people are more interested in your motivation here than my own.

That's the amount of substance that your defense has. You are clearly motivated by something shady here that we are not aware of, thus I can't trust you either. Unless you reveal what the reason is, or you stop your selective enforcement bullshit as well as your subtle ad hominem attempts, you may as well stop responding. I am not going to waste time writing long responses to logical fallacies and hypocrites.  

---

He BROKE the rules when he plagiarized, end of story.

LaudaM - - You seem to be missing several  points.



1. this person clearly did not break the board rules. The person you were sticking up for did.

2. you want to see what you initially saw as unfair imposed upon others because it happened once. Actually this is even more unfair because he did not break the rules. You seem not to stick to your beliefs and are now arguing therefore for what you initially saw as unfair. I'm not sure what that says about you. . As I have already shown this is even more unfair because he did not claim the work as his own.
Incidentally even though the guy you were arguing FOR did break the rules I agree that it was harsh to perm ban him.... however this is not comparable to this instance in that this person did not break the board rules as they are written. Any implied further meaning to those rules are up for debate.

This is what you are saying here.

The store rules ( those leaving the store without paying for goods are thieves)

I don't think the person who walked into a store and took the fruit without paying should be hung -- that seems too extreme. Okay he got hung damn.

In that case I want the other guy who walked into the store threw the money on the floor of that store before leaving to be certainly hung because that makes it fair.

Sorry that is just strange and just makes it look like you have a strange moral compass.

3. That I know you can change and alter your perspective on things regularly hence why I need to see the basis of each and every statement that you make that seems unreasonable.



Please laudaM take time to structure your argument so that is is not so time wasting . Try to say something and then substantiate it with a logical path that can be followed for me not to have to just repeat myself over and over. It may be best to go back and read the original thread a few times. Then as I said bring forth any holes you find so we can discuss it.

First copy and paste the unofficial rule that was broken before posting more unsubstantiated claims.

Either you're an idiot or you're intentionally lying. I literally stated that I've requested for an exemption in the past, which was rejected by the forum. I have accepted this decision, and have therefore started asking for non selective enforcement which is why Rambotic has to be banned. Calling out for equal enforcement is not a hypocritical stance, unless you're a delusional kool-aid drinker.

There is no 'some plagiarism is fine' vs. 'some plagiarism isn't fine'.

This is false. I am almost never wrong with neither my opinions nor my ratings. FYI if you don't change a false opinion in light of proper evidence you're an idiot, which is clearly not something that you understand (trying to demonize this like a proper NPC).

Miss me with that leftist/globalist garbage. Rambotic is an undesirable shitposter that broke the rules. That is the only objective fact here.

---

My question to you is: Why have you taken such a keen interest in this shitposter? You aren't that active in this part of town.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.35964475

No you are a selective hypocrite.  That persons copy and paste was not a fair comparison as I have shown before.

Also LaudaM you have often altered your opinion on things that were clearly wrong to start with.

Every person is worthy of a fair assessment of the observable fact.

No. You're just a selective hypocrite. Either ban people who plagiarism or don't. If you make exceptions (which doesn't seem to be the case given that people have asked for them in the past (including myself)), then this user is certainly not worthy of one either.

But that post just confirms another reason why Darkstar was 100% correct in light of the evidence we have to over turn your claim of him being a plagiarist. You did not leave red trust for him being a shit poster (which I have refuted strongly and provided argument) but plagiarism which you say is not arguable he is not. You have also recently even said the board rules (which are unofficial) need more clarity.  On this point they are clear but people are simply sayimg they imply things they do not say.

Intent and context are very important as Lauda himself has said before.

Being a shit poster also needs to have some criteria provided so we can measure people against it. To me he is not a shit poster.

Lauda also provides no basis for his statement that Darkstar has acted incorrectly. On the basis of what exactly?

Here is Lauda https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.35964475

1. there is no black and white (even though the accused broke no board rule as it stands) and the context clearly shows the OP had no reason to post suspected plagiarism in the meta board the ban hammers looking for nails in great concentration there and no sig banner... no real gain at all. Just trying to be helpful and getting fucked.

The entire thing is a waste of board time and resource.

Other posters in that thread after reviewing the context, intent, and full presentation of the observable events was brought to their intention seemed to soften on their stance.

Darkstar_  displayed why he is a DT here and has shown great character.  If we are to have judges here they must be flexible and able to alter opinion as observable events dictate.

I don't see how that legitimate disagreement. I couldn't possibly imagine why DarkStar would counter on someone who a) Is definitely guilty of what he/she was accused of. b) Reacts the way that he reacted. This is one of those cases where you would usually either ignore it (due to the walls of nonsense being posted) or double up the tag as it is certainly valid.

---

OP you need to calm down; you're out of control.

Ok Ivan, you are a corrupt cop who stops people for 20lv fines as you are a pajeet.

Threats and actions are two different things. Now go wank off boris again so you can earn back the 100lv import duties.

For 10$ we can afford some special services from the female part of your family for sure, but not my honest
I'm way more than traffic policeman And every single country in the world is corrupt Don't forget you live in the same country.
Import duties was 450$ not 50$
And yeah your "friend" was so sad about not winning that giveaway he should attack the winner
And don't worry, i don't feel ashamed from the fact i earn less than criminals like you