Thanks for this I really enjoyed your reply, my article was written more with my stomach than with the mind linked to my hands. Your reply is much clear and push it forward I hope Everybody will read it carefully.
...
I hope so too, but I doubt it. My reply was long and requires critical thought to understand. More likely, they will single out something (either something irrelevant, or something which looks bad when taken out of context), as you've seen. It's the same tactic for avoiding actual debate that has dictated most recent elections. Philosophically, I think it's used in place of shouting, in places where shouting is either impossible or not permitted. The effect is the same, anyway: Actual debate is impossible because the few who would debate cannot easily have it amid the noise, so the discussion is suppressed.
Thanks also to BittBurger it wasn't really my purpose to let people buy anything for real haha.
But now after the first sentences about I was a NXT PR, I'm BTC C PR haha. Why people cannot read?
Because our reading comprehension / literacy scores are just as miserable as our math and science scores.
More diplomatically, there are other factors. I'm just a simple Texan, but I spent several years living in Japan, my wife is Japanese, and my work as an engineer puts me alongside many who speak english second (or third), and Chinese in particular. Without realizing it, it's probably much easier for me to understand your writing. Even if you had not said you were Chinese, the "accent" of your English clearly is. Everyone's native language affects the way they synthesize their n+1 languages to some degree, and with rare exception, you can usually hear ("hear") this, many times even in writing.
I wouldn't think this should be as difficult as it plainly must be. You say "Your reply is much clear and push it forward I hope Everybody will read it carefully." Despite that being incorrect in several grammatical ways, I can still infer 90% of what you meant, and then proceed with the 10% using an educated guess based on context.
It's like error-correcting code. Again, as an engineer, my field deals with ECC and FEC (forward error-correction, meaning the bits to fix things are interleaved before the data bits they fix, so you can repair errors on-the-fly) in particular. I've always found the parallels to language interpretation fascinating. I have some ideas for using context and syntax for creating a translator that essentially does what my brain does, but I'm sure Google will make such a thing long before I ever could...