Pages:
Author

Topic: Ransomware and Bitcoin (Read 281 times)

jr. member
Activity: 700
Merit: 3
October 02, 2021, 02:16:55 PM
#34
I just came across an atricle where the US treasury department purpose to sanction crypto and the reason they give is that bitcoin is used for ransomware so if we stop the usuage of bitcoin, there will be no Ransomware  attacks. How ridiculous it this ?

Instead of going after the hackers, they are going after the crypto. Will the hackers stop ransonware attacks if there is no crypto ?

US Treasury Dept sanctions crypto OTC broker Suex for alleged role in facilitating transactions for ransomware attacks

Stop Cryptocurrency, Ransomware attack would be perpetrated through another medium. Hackers do not relent. They should work towards stopping the hackers instead and not blame the fault on crypto.
sr. member
Activity: 966
Merit: 421
Bitcoindata.science
October 02, 2021, 11:53:18 AM
#33
I don't just get the analogy you were trying to pass through but then, the US treasury has got no point on this I tell you. Crypto has got to be crypto as well as bitcoin would stay bitcoin. Its supposed to be anonymous and it should stay that way, signifying the freedom of the people. All this trash they throw around is just because, its not an asset within a centralized system and as such, its very far from there paws. Even if cryptos go out of existence, ransomware would still be collected by criminals so, they've just got to stop beating themselves up.
I am not in anyway neglecting the anonymous nature of Bitcoin or other decentralized cryptocurrency. And I know as well that even if cryptocurrency goes into extinction ransomware attackers will still be on the increase. My point here is the government have every right to react to the level of cyber attack on their database and assets in which the attackers demand ransom in cryptocurrency where exchanges is  the medium for receiving the ransom fee but there is nothing this exchanges can do to salvage this case because no one can point out who owns which coin and how this coins were moved. Except for exchanges that enforces KYC on their customers
legendary
Activity: 3234
Merit: 5637
Blackjack.fun-Free Raffle-Join&Win $50🎲
October 01, 2021, 05:41:39 AM
#32
I just came across an atricle where the US treasury department purpose to sanction crypto and the reason they give is that bitcoin is used for ransomware so if we stop the usuage of bitcoin, there will be no Ransomware  attacks. How ridiculous it this ?

Such a conclusion can be made only by a person or persons who have no idea what they are talking about, or knowingly want to manipulate the public. Blaming a tool for something, not the one using it, has always been wrong - and if they are already going in that direction, let them ban the sale of firearms to civilians, thus saving thousands of innocent people every year.

In addition, the fact is that ransomware has been around since 1989, so long before anyone even thought of Bitcoin.

The first ever ransomware virus was created in 1989 by Harvard-trained evolutionary biologist Joseph L. Popp (now known as the 'father of ransomware'). It was called the AIDS Trojan, also known as the PC Cyborg. Popp sent 20,000 infected diskettes labeled “AIDS Information – Introductory Diskettes” to attendees of the World Health Organization’s international AIDS conference in Stockholm. The disks contained malicious code that hid file directories, locked file names and demanded victims send $189 to a PO Box in Panama if they wanted their data back. The AIDS Trojan was “generation one” ransomware malware and relatively easy to overcome. The Trojan used simple symmetric cryptography and tools were soon available to decrypt the file names. But the AIDS Trojan set the scene for what was to come.
sr. member
Activity: 1820
Merit: 418
Telegram: @worldofcoinss
September 30, 2021, 04:53:45 PM
#31
This is just another excuse for them to get bitcoin banned.

To me, this proves that they're unable to do anything but fill out people who're unaware of bitcoin with information that's damaging to its reputation.

**Trojans are created using C++ so the operating system must be banned**
hero member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 609
September 30, 2021, 04:25:00 PM
#30
I really don't understand why they blame Bitcoin for every bad thing. They only point out the negatives and where are the positives? All these criminal acts, were they not in existence before Bitcoin? If someone uses a bottle to break a fellow's head, will they ban the use of glass bottles too? Silly! I think they are just looking for excuses to stop the usage of Bitcoin before it becomes uncontrollable for them.
Its all lame excuses nothingless and this had been always the traditional words that we do commonly hear out when it comes to criticisms about bitcoin on where it should be banned because it is been used mainly by

criminals or people who do have criminality kind of thinking without even realizing or looking back that things like these did really exist before Bitcoin exist.It is really just that they are really pushing that bitcoin would

end up on having negative reputation but it turns out that it wont really be enough because there are lots in the community had really believed on bitcoin true use case.
sr. member
Activity: 1680
Merit: 288
Eloncoin.org - Mars, here we come!
September 30, 2021, 04:20:49 PM
#29
I really don't understand why they blame Bitcoin for every bad thing. They only point out the negatives and where are the positives? All these criminal acts, were they not in existence before Bitcoin? If someone uses a bottle to break a fellow's head, will they ban the use of glass bottles too? Silly! I think they are just looking for excuses to stop the usage of Bitcoin before it becomes uncontrollable for them.
legendary
Activity: 3542
Merit: 1965
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
September 30, 2021, 03:07:41 PM
#28
The conspiracy theory that sounds even worst is this..... The US government are behind these hacks and they fabricated these hacks to get a reason to ban Bitcoin. You remember the search for the "Weapons of Mass destruction" and the invasion of  Iraq ...... for Oil?

There even was some people who were saying the 9/11 attacks was sanctioned by the US to start a war .... because a war provide them a opportunity to profit and to create job opportunities for their soldiers. (You cannot pay 100 000's of people in the army... just to train)

So.... you still think these so-called hackers are real?
legendary
Activity: 1554
Merit: 1139
September 30, 2021, 01:48:54 PM
#27
The US Treasury department has a point on this but should also consider that this ransomware attackers hide within exchanges to get ransom for their attacks but sanctioning this exchange is a like blaming a man for been attacked by an anonymous armed robber
I don't just get the analogy you were trying to pass through but then, the US treasury has got no point on this I tell you. Crypto has got to be crypto as well as bitcoin would stay bitcoin. Its supposed to be anonymous and it should stay that way, signifying the freedom of the people. All this trash they throw around is just because, its not an asset within a centralized system and as such, its very far from there paws. Even if cryptos go out of existence, ransomware would still be collected by criminals so, they've just got to stop beating themselves up.
legendary
Activity: 2338
Merit: 1084
zknodes.org
September 27, 2021, 12:18:53 PM
#26
There are many way to do money laundering. Even if those hackers use worthless new coin but they agree with the value of it then it is works. Law enforcement should focus on the hackers. I think even if bitcoin is not exist those hackers will still have desire to hack to get money. The problem is the human not bitcoin. I am pretty surprised that some people has that way of thinking.
One of the new ways that scammers are currently using to launder money is with NFT. You must know by now the price of NFT is insane. A single NFT image is even worth hundreds of thousands of dollars.
Apart from that as you said about creating a new coin which is planned and then RugPull happens, that is also a scammer scam.
Not just Using Ransomware, Ransomware is just a tool that can be applied to any crime. Even if there is no bitcoin, fraud with other methods will still exist and the target is of course users.
sr. member
Activity: 966
Merit: 421
Bitcoindata.science
September 26, 2021, 07:08:52 AM
#25
The US Treasury department has a point on this but should also consider that this ransomware attackers hide within exchanges to get ransom for their attacks but sanctioning this exchange is a like blaming a man for been attacked by an anonymous armed robber. I believe theCzech Republic and Russia-based business Suex OTC  might not really know how the wallets of this Randsomware attackers get funded so the US Treasury department  would be going too extreme blaming them
full member
Activity: 1484
Merit: 136
★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!
September 26, 2021, 05:32:20 AM
#24
They are just linking it to crypto in order for the government to control crypto. Yes, there is a possibility that the ransomware attack is due to hackers wanting to know your data/assets and holding it for you to pay but lets think outside of it. Crypto or not, ransomware will happen if your computer didn't have enough protection and if you are negligent.
legendary
Activity: 3038
Merit: 4418
Crypto Swap Exchange
September 26, 2021, 01:15:23 AM
#23
The nature of Bitcoin allows for easier collection of funds when involved in ransomware attacks, that is an undeniable fact. Actively banning Bitcoin or otherwise imposing sanctions on an exchange does not solve the problem. It is merely an attempt at trying to show people that they're doing something. Fraudsters are always going to mix their funds and use P2P methods to exchange the funds and people would be none the wiser. OFAC is quite a useless list and doesn't do anything to tackle the problem.
sr. member
Activity: 1274
Merit: 265
September 25, 2021, 11:49:24 PM
#22
There are many way to do money laundering. Even if those hackers use worthless new coin but they agree with the value of it then it is works. Law enforcement should focus on the hackers. I think even if bitcoin is not exist those hackers will still have desire to hack to get money. The problem is the human not bitcoin. I am pretty surprised that some people has that way of thinking.

Fraudulent and illicit activities are happening since centuries and will continue in days to come, there is no way to eliminate them. Government can play its role to minimize them. Hacking was there even before BTC came into existence. Technology is double edge sword and it has both good and bad usages. AFAIK, government just using such issue to do more opposition to crypto rather then targeting the real issue.   
hero member
Activity: 2114
Merit: 603
September 25, 2021, 10:10:40 PM
#21
Whether the SUEX is based out of Russia, China or who knows made by nerd in his back trunk, the big point here it’s Online. It’s through the Internet which can be masked if you are smart enough and wander the world anonymously. I think US will have no regulation upon this matter if it’s over the Internet. We saw that, US will fear before they could take down the bitcoin or crypto space because they know in today’s word most of the income is made over the Internet and it’s rising at alarming rate.

So if they are not able to take down the home mysteries then how would they go in another country and do it.
hero member
Activity: 2688
Merit: 540
DGbet.fun - Crypto Sportsbook
September 25, 2021, 09:59:11 PM
#20
I just came across an atricle where the US treasury department purpose to sanction crypto and the reason they give is that bitcoin is used for ransomware so if we stop the usuage of bitcoin, there will be no Ransomware  attacks. How ridiculous it this ?

Instead of going after the hackers, they are going after the crypto. Will the hackers stop ransonware attacks if there is no crypto ?

US Treasury Dept sanctions crypto OTC broker Suex for alleged role in facilitating transactions for ransomware attacks
How could they stop if they do really plan out to do so? Bitcoin network couldnt be stopped as long there would be a demand.Cyberattacks or ransomeware had been here before bitcoin had exist.
It did really just able to even more rampant when crypto did exist which its undeniable which it is totally its cons due to anonymity which hacks do really make use of that advantage.
They are just good on verbal things on stopping it but no one could really do in the first place thats why we should rather mind instead about security and being having common sense
to avoid possible hacks or ransomwares.
full member
Activity: 452
Merit: 101
September 25, 2021, 09:15:09 PM
#19
There are many way to do money laundering. Even if those hackers use worthless new coin but they agree with the value of it then it is works. Law enforcement should focus on the hackers. I think even if bitcoin is not exist those hackers will still have desire to hack to get money. The problem is the human not bitcoin. I am pretty surprised that some people has that way of thinking.
hero member
Activity: 3136
Merit: 591
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
September 25, 2021, 10:06:13 AM
#18
No, they can't stop the hackers to keep going with ransomware. Even if they ban bitcoin and et. al, these hackers will still attack those vulnerable people and then no one will stop them from asking crypto from their victims. They should track down these hackers.
What a brilliant idea, giving sanction to crypto and banning bitcoin, who are they against with? nobody can stop the usage of these and they should stop the hackers instead.
Their attack on crypto to allegedly protect the cyber infrastructure from ransomware will only protect them from local attacks/threats but not from international attacks, remember that Russia is secretly funding cyber criminals to attack USA albeit their denying it, they're protecting them still.
I don't know about that Russia that you've mentioned but you'll never know when an attack will happen and when it is originating. It's not the only country that has that infrastructure towards cyber security. And about saying that they're funding cyber criminals, where have you read that, will you please link the source? thanks.

No, they can't stop the hackers to keep going with ransomware. Even if they ban bitcoin and et. al, these hackers will still attack those vulnerable people and then no one will stop them from asking crypto from their victims. They should track down these hackers.
What a brilliant idea, giving sanction to crypto and banning bitcoin, who are they against with? nobody can stop the usage of these and they should stop the hackers instead.
True. What they are trying to do is barking at the wrong tree basically. Thinking that it's bitcoin that's causing the ransomware and hacking attacks when it's can never be closer to the truth. Feasibility researches should be made before proposing bills like this because it's just stupid to think to hear that the people we entrusted our taxes with think like this.
They should have focused on the actual problem and that's to chase those hackers and not pointing their fingers to bitcoin.
sr. member
Activity: 1666
Merit: 426
September 24, 2021, 10:59:12 PM
#17
To be honest it's much easier tracking these attackers down and apprehending them than banning cryptocurrencies in general. Just another way for the government to mask its ulterior motives of protecting fiat's standing in the economy. Although just like the other moves they did in the past, this will also be in vain. The amount of people who know what bitcoin and cryptocurrencies are capable of is nothing to laugh about, the government should be aware of that.
No, they can't stop the hackers to keep going with ransomware. Even if they ban bitcoin and et. al, these hackers will still attack those vulnerable people and then no one will stop them from asking crypto from their victims. They should track down these hackers.
What a brilliant idea, giving sanction to crypto and banning bitcoin, who are they against with? nobody can stop the usage of these and they should stop the hackers instead.
True. What they are trying to do is barking at the wrong tree basically. Thinking that it's bitcoin that's causing the ransomware and hacking attacks when it's can never be closer to the truth. Feasibility researches should be made before proposing bills like this because it's just stupid to think to hear that the people we entrusted our taxes with think like this.
member
Activity: 868
Merit: 63
September 24, 2021, 09:25:19 PM
#16
No, they can't stop the hackers to keep going with ransomware. Even if they ban bitcoin and et. al, these hackers will still attack those vulnerable people and then no one will stop them from asking crypto from their victims. They should track down these hackers.
What a brilliant idea, giving sanction to crypto and banning bitcoin, who are they against with? nobody can stop the usage of these and they should stop the hackers instead.
Their attack on crypto to allegedly protect the cyber infrastructure from ransomware will only protect them from local attacks/threats but not from international attacks, remember that Russia is secretly funding cyber criminals to attack USA albeit their denying it, they're protecting them still.
hero member
Activity: 3136
Merit: 591
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
September 24, 2021, 06:12:56 PM
#15
No, they can't stop the hackers to keep going with ransomware. Even if they ban bitcoin and et. al, these hackers will still attack those vulnerable people and then no one will stop them from asking crypto from their victims. They should track down these hackers.
What a brilliant idea, giving sanction to crypto and banning bitcoin, who are they against with? nobody can stop the usage of these and they should stop the hackers instead.
Pages:
Jump to: