Topic: Rating of bounty managers - page 6. (Read 2068 times)
I think there is. But i don't have any idea if anyone can make a rating to all bounty managers. I guess only the ICO bounty team will give the ratings to the bounty managers and not the users nor participants.
In General, AmaZix team conducts good projects, but the comfort of participation in the project, unfortunately, depends on the specific Manager. I have a negative experience with TagaMungkahi from AmaZix. Anyone interested can see how the Manager checks the report and what is happening with spredsheets project Current.
Is there any rating of bounty managers available? That could be a great resource to see who is most experienced and best.
Very interesting idea. It's cool. Perhaps somebody could bring this idea into reality. It would be helpfull not only for ICOs but also for bountyhunters.
Such rating could even help bountyhunters to get the best ICOs based on bountymanagers picks.
Its great and i will support this too.
As i know, the manager is only small piece of success so i will not so aware about it.
As i know, there is more important thing which can make success beside manager like team and others.
Is there any rating of bounty managers available? That could be a great resource to see who is most experienced and best.
What are the things you should include in the criteria for rating the bounty managers? Like is it the way they give stakes?
good advice, it may be very helpful for who will look for bounty project and also can reduce the number of bounty scam, because according to me if the experienced manager will not be possible the project scam 
As for me, i haven't come across the bounty manager ratings. It keeps on changing, but I`ve seen few awesome guys like colorlessk and Steve from Gladius bounty. These guys r rly not bad. Steve especially is very responsive and took extra steps to eliminate the fake profile and fake bounty hunters i think.
Met such a material in the Russian-language branch, but I want to say that this is not the best way to choose a company
Maybe this can work. We don't see green trust in managers that much -red trust more often on those lazy ones-. I don't know are people having trust issues? 
Maybe we can do a community voting poll for this. To bring out best managers who actually check campaigns and hunters good.
Maybe we can do a community voting poll for this. To bring out best managers who actually check campaigns and hunters good.
I think trust rating is enough to know who is the best manager because anyone can manage campaign of they want so it is impossible to track the manahers and implement a rating system for them so see their trust rating before hiring them and there are already some well know managers are available so they can be considered as best.
I do not think there's a reward manager rating, but I'm convinced it would be a great idea. In addition to the rating of ICO projects, there is also a reward rating. It would have seemed wonderful to me.
"trust" that resides in each account in my opinion including rating. however, only moderators can provide a rating to the bounty managers. if we can give it also may be better, because we often encounter a scam
Depends on how many campaigns the had succeeded some bounties are failed but if bounty managers are very loyal on their participants and pay tokens on time then they can have alot of projects to get.
There are some bounty managers that trusted in rating.They are responsible in paying us weekly and following their rules and regulations must worth it for us.They try everything to make their project successful and thats the traits of every campaign manager need.
Trust rating is one way of showing that some one is good as bounty manager and most of the hunters always mention someone name to one. Like this thread
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/good-bounty-manager-3085997
''If you do bad people will talk about you but when you do great then member will spread your name...''
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/good-bounty-manager-3085997
''If you do bad people will talk about you but when you do great then member will spread your name...''
BTC paying signature campaign or bounties. In this both the side yahoo would be the right person to get the 5 out of 5 whether it is participants rating or previously used project owner's rating. He is mister perfect in managing any kind of signature campaign I have noticed.
When there is no ICO in end of 2015 onwards I am seeing him. So far and present, He is perfect person to manage the any kind of campaign. He is been advisor for some ICO projects as well.
My Top Three bestie Managers are below:
Yahoo62278
aTriz
Hexah
When there is no ICO in end of 2015 onwards I am seeing him. So far and present, He is perfect person to manage the any kind of campaign. He is been advisor for some ICO projects as well.
My Top Three bestie Managers are below:
Yahoo62278
aTriz
Hexah
The idea is good, it's just what the assessment will be like? Is it from the project, or from the bounty manager himself? I think this is rather difficult, although I support this idea.
Usually, if the bounty manager is the developer himself, this is not bad, but more professional bounty managers with high rank on the forum cause more confidence. This is only my opinion.
about Sandra Evans I can only say good: I asked about shares, she counted all that was missed, and the answer was sent that everything is ok. I will continue to work with this manager
Yes im hoping for that to happen because a lot of bounty managers are not updating the stakes and sometimes they skip of some bounty reports. But it should not anytime every time because a lot of bounty hunters are doing their best.
Thanks for creating this thread
Thanks for creating this thread
Is there any rating of bounty managers available? That could be a great resource to see who is most experienced and best.
- Aren't the forum's trust ratings enough ? I mean if someone's a good manager,that would reflect on his ratings.- Moreover,who'd you call a great bounty manager ? Someone's who's good at managing spreedsheets or someone who can make sure the bounties help in reaching the target audience ?
-Subjective
Dont believe that the current rating system is enough. Moreover Merits definitely ar not objective since managers get a lot of merits for campaigns which are successful and give them a lot of profit.
One can be a great manager but project can fail and in other situation, campaign manager could be poor but a project could be a successful.
I believe that the rating should be based on how do manager manages spreadsheets, how many mistakes he makes and how he corrects them. Also how he communicates.
I have been wondering how much does manager contribute regarding the distribution of bounty, does manager is the one who decides what % is going to different bounty types, signature, twitter and so on ?
Jump to: