Pages:
Author

Topic: [RE-ANN] GrowthCoin PoW/PoS - 100% per year - Version 1.3.0.1 - page 35. (Read 66388 times)

newbie
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
Have managed to negotiate with 162.243.13.186, but that is only at height 119069, and does not appear to be advancing. This is the only peer that has replied to the version message... no such luck with 188.226.240.91, 128.199.191.230, 23.92.53.139, 77.131.6.113, 64.188.164.77, 82.9.77.178, 108.61.18.94

I should add that I started from scratch as per the OP. Empty db, only remnant file being the wallet.


I'm currently connected to:

23.92.53.139:17177
67.211.45.66:17177
188.226.155.94:17177
155.210.52.121:17177
82.9.77.178:17177

All are version: GrowthCoin:1.3.0
None of them shows height -1.

I hope it's helpful to you.
sr. member
Activity: 296
Merit: 250
I have the wallet that was open from this morning that is syncronized, but the other that I open an hour ago did not sync. I so copy the block*dat files from the other and it is now good.
It shows 5 connections and it is at the same level of pool.
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1092
Have managed to negotiate with 162.243.13.186, but that is only at height 119069, and does not appear to be advancing. This is the only peer that has replied to the version message... no such luck with 188.226.240.91, 128.199.191.230, 23.92.53.139, 77.131.6.113, 64.188.164.77, 82.9.77.178, 108.61.18.94

I should add that I started from scratch as per the OP. Empty db, only remnant file being the wallet.
sr. member
Activity: 504
Merit: 254
I've just compiled from the source at https://github.com/iamunick/growthcoin , which shows the update "Fix fork" from 2 hours ago.

It is connecting to peers, but negotiation never proceeds: I send my version, but never receive one back. This has happened with at least 5 different peers. 'getpeerlist' shows a startingheight of -1 for each peer (for the short period they appear).

debug.log does not show the "partner XXX using old client" string, so it does not appear to be my end forcing the disconnect.

Anyone else having the same problem?

I'm currently testing this out.

I had to reindex the blockchain on a few of my clients, still reindexing.

I'll let you know if it connects good after the reindex is complete.
sr. member
Activity: 296
Merit: 250
The fix looks for the version of the node and if version is wrong it disconnect it.
However actually there are probably other nodes in wrong fork, and them are with the right client version, so the fix is for preventing other future fork (I think)
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1092
I've just compiled from the source at https://github.com/iamunick/growthcoin , which shows the update "Fix fork" from 2 hours ago.

It is connecting to peers, but negotiation never proceeds: I send my version, but never receive one back. This has happened with at least 5 different peers. 'getpeerlist' shows a startingheight of -1 for each peer (for the short period they appear).

debug.log does not show the "partner XXX using old client" string, so it does not appear to be my end forcing the disconnect.

Anyone else having the same problem?
legendary
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000
Blockchain Developer
I'm on the right fork and I'm connected to these nodes:

 ./growthcoind getpeerinfo |grep addr
        "addr" : "50.160.86.142:57623",
        "addr" : "113.57.188.10:39893",
        "addr" : "23.92.53.139:17177",
        "addr" : "77.131.6.113:49994",
        "addr" : "109.235.190.7:55175",
        "addr" : "69.17.241.165:35248",
        "addr" : "82.171.127.104:1807",
        "addr" : "64.188.164.77:59406",
        "addr" : "64.188.164.77:36602",
        "addr" : "162.243.13.186:38206",
        "addr" : "174.52.185.202:51256",

now at block: 590838

Does anyone know the fork block? It should be checkpointed.
full member
Activity: 145
Merit: 100
I'm on the right fork and I'm connected to these nodes:

 ./growthcoind getpeerinfo |grep addr
        "addr" : "50.160.86.142:57623",
        "addr" : "113.57.188.10:39893",
        "addr" : "23.92.53.139:17177",
        "addr" : "77.131.6.113:49994",
        "addr" : "109.235.190.7:55175",
        "addr" : "69.17.241.165:35248",
        "addr" : "82.171.127.104:1807",
        "addr" : "64.188.164.77:59406",
        "addr" : "64.188.164.77:36602",
        "addr" : "162.243.13.186:38206",
        "addr" : "174.52.185.202:51256",

now at block: 590838
sr. member
Activity: 296
Merit: 250
The two pools are still on the same fork as they are at blocks 590,738.

For the people that have problem in syncronization try the two address of the pools as nodes

hero member
Activity: 1008
Merit: 501
 Smiley  100%per year too high
sr. member
Activity: 296
Merit: 250
My client is of number v1.3.0.0-beta and just synced with the 1.3.0.0 node found here http://grw.blockx.info/connected-nodes. I checked getpeers, but it didn't connect to Satoshi:1.2.1 node found on the same site. I'm at block 590713, but wonder if I'm on the right fork.

The 1.2.1 is to not use as it is the one that create problems at it use an old version of the coin.
Maybe blockinfo is on wrong fork.
newbie
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
Hello to all!  Smiley
I'm new to this forum and following the GRW topic for some while.

My client is of number v1.3.0.0-beta and just synced with the 1.3.0.0 node found here http://grw.blockx.info/connected-nodes. I checked getpeers, but it didn't connect to Satoshi:1.2.1 node found on the same site. I'm at block 590713, but wonder if I'm on the right fork.
Can you explain me how to check this?

Greetings,
Alex_Koekie
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 503
Monero Core Team
We shouldn't forget that PoS is first meant to protect and carry on the blockchain, so if someone never opens their wallet to support the blockchain, he could be "taxed" for it.
+1. Interest is a reward for securing the network and we should never forget that.

On a more general note, I believe we should encourage cross-fertilisation amond the high-PoS family (PHS, HBN, GRW, NOBL (soon), CAP, TEK, HYP and maybe others). I think armin22 is considering creating a common website for all these PoS. A "feature comparison list" would help knowing which coin has yet to add which feature. Then a price/interest/number of coin ratio could be used as an incentive for spreading out the investment.

Or and could someone give a growthcoin.conf example? I have only one connection on my wallet Sad
hero member
Activity: 553
Merit: 500
Solo Miner Legend
The pool has find lot of orphans in an hours and with the new wallet there was essentially no more orphans so far.
My pc wallet has find lot of POS, so I look to connections and now it has only 2 nodes.

Maybe I start to think that the wrong fork is becoming the more powerful.

Yeah, almost sounds like it.
sr. member
Activity: 296
Merit: 250
The pool has find lot of orphans in an hours and with the new wallet there was essentially no more orphans so far.
My pc wallet has find lot of POS, so I look to connections and now it has only 2 nodes.

Maybe I start to think that the wrong fork is becoming the more powerful.
hero member
Activity: 553
Merit: 500
Solo Miner Legend
So just wondering, is there a way to get on the right chain manually or will we have to wait for the update?

I made a small attempt, but it jumped onto the wrong one, anyway. I tried using noirc=1 and just connect= to a correct peer.
sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 250
Colossuscoin - the future of payment methods
Thanks to presstab, you can find the windows Qt with latest commit here

keep in mind this is a pre-release build. It's still safe to use.

https://github.com/iamunick/growthcoin/releases


Let me check for that blockchain file


thanks,unick
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
So just wondering, is there a way to get on the right chain manually or will we have to wait for the update?
hero member
Activity: 553
Merit: 500
Solo Miner Legend
So it looks like it's just forking away, then. Block explorer has stopped @ block #588019 some 9 hours ago, at the time of writing this.
hero member
Activity: 553
Merit: 500
Solo Miner Legend
We shouldn't forget that PoS is first meant to protect and carry on the blockchain, so if someone never opens their wallet to support the blockchain, he could be "taxed" for it.
Maybe it's a good idea to base PoS reward on wallet online time?
e.g. if during block maturity period wallet was online 24/7 all the time it gets 100% of PoS reward but if wallet was offline for some time reward decreases accordingly.

For example if PoS rate is 150% and wallet was online all the time block gets full 150% PoS reward, but if it was online only 6 hours/day it gets only 37.5%, etc.

People will be motivated to keep their wallets online and also we will be safe from sleeping "millionaire" accounts sudden huge pos reward dump.

I would totally stop using a coin which wallet I had to have online for 24/7, say 15-60 mins a day, but def. 24/7, I have other wallets I can't have on at the same time plus I do other things with my few computers I have. I'd have to get a Rasp Pi just for that reason then.
Pages:
Jump to: