Topic: [RE-ANN][FCK] ★FCKBANKS REBORN ★(New Devs and team) ★ - page 47. (Read 103930 times)

yup, its fixed now on the github repo, you know you could have done it yourself on there

i never noticed because it was running fine for me, but i guess if there is a crash or something it does a check and then errors and thats the issue, should be fine now tho hopefully

Yes that's the config, but in bitcoin/networks.py there is this part:

fckbankscoin=math.Object(
        P2P_PREFIX='fcd9b7dd'.decode('hex'), #stripped from fckbankscoind's main.cpp -> pchMessageStart[4] = { 0xfc, 0xd9, 0xb7, 0xdd };
        P2P_PORT=21779, #fckbankscoind 's p2p port
        ADDRESS_VERSION=36, #look again in the sourcecode in the file base58.h, and find the value of PUBKEY_ADDRESS.
        RPC_PORT=21778, #fckbankscoind 's rpc port
        RPC_CHECK=defer.inlineCallbacks(lambda bitcoind: defer.returnValue(
            'fckbankscoin address' in (yield bitcoind.rpc_help()) and
            not (yield bitcoind.rpc_getinfo())['testnet']
        )),
        SUBSIDY_FUNC=lambda height: 100000*100000000 >> (height + 1)//100000,
        POW_FUNC=lambda data: pack.IntType(256).unpack(__import__('ltc_scrypt').getPoWHash(data)),
        BLOCK_PERIOD=60, # one block generation time
        SYMBOL='FCK',
        CONF_FILE_FUNC=lambda: os.path.join(os.path.join(os.environ['APPDATA'], 'fckbankscoin') if platform.system() == 'Windows' else os.path.expanduser('~/Library/Application Support/fckbankscoin/') if platform.system() == 'Darwin' else os.path.expanduser('~/.fckbankscoin'), 'fckbankscoin.conf'),
        BLOCK_EXPLORER_URL_PREFIX='http://fckexplorer.hashattack.com:8080/block/',
        ADDRESS_EXPLORER_URL_PREFIX='http://fckexplorer.hashattack.com:8080/address/',
        TX_EXPLORER_URL_PREFIX='http://fckexplorer.hashattack.com:8080/tx/',
        SANE_TARGET_RANGE=(2**256//1000000000 - 1, 2**256//1000 - 1), #??
        DUMB_SCRYPT_DIFF=2**16, #??
        DUST_THRESHOLD=0.03e8, #??
    ),

and if you check the new fckbankscoin sourcecode, specifically the file rpcdump.cpp there is this part near the bottom:

if (fHelp || params.size() != 1)
        throw runtime_error(
            "dumpprivkey <fckbankscoinaddress>\n"
            "Reveals the private key corresponding to .");

Those 2 have to match otherwise p2pool does not work, I only discovered this after the powersurge that hit my server last monday and was unable to restart fck p2pool while all others worked, the error it kept giving didn't offer any clue to what was wrong until I found this bit after going through nearly all lines of code 

I'm not quite sure what you mean exactly , but you are looking for this probably:
https://github.com/fckbankscoin/p2pool-rav
i put in a pull request to raven but he still hasnt merged it.... so for the meantime that is the correct p2pool source until they do

is that what you mean?

Just a quick note for the devs, during the latest sourcecode update someone changed the 'fckbankscoin address' in rpcdump.cpp to 'fckbankscoinaddress' but the p2pool config published on Rav3nPL still has the old version in networks.py, took me half a day to figure that one out because p2pool kept giving me the finger with an rpc port error 

This is an extremely rude comment - especially as the DEVS and FCKS community are working so hard to make this a solid long term non pump and dump coin. There are tons of coins like one I know with 50% or 100% premine and they are doing awesome. Plus the fact that 3% premine is going towards bounties and development so what's your problem? READ THE ANN THREADS PROPERLY before passing judgement thanks!!

there technically are more than 4 'devs' now, as far as the most active that would likely be syntaks who is doing the work with adding some new features to the wallet itself (features no other crypto has built in), i'm currently the one designing the new website, lava is working on the tip bots

as far as 'with us' i'm not sure what that means, but feel free to go into irc and talk with anyone of the group, if you have any ideas or anything

edit: this is a community project, if you have any experience with any of that stuff feel free to join in

OK, one more question. There were 4 devs after taking FCK over. Which of them are active and with us at the moment?

i believe i said my problem multiple times on multiple posts in this thread.

in essence the way mintpal and other bribevote exchanges are set up, you are bribing 'devs' to add a coin that takes literally 5 minutes to add to the exchange, it sets up for adding coins that are just going to be pump and dumped.

here is how it goes:
you make a coin, (in the most recent cases either a meme based coin or a celebrity likeness coin) you then pay a site like mintpal to have it listed (as in the case of the last 5 coins added by mintpal having each over 1000-2000$usd in votes) and then you dump them.. thats whats been happening, thats not really good for the users, the crypto community or anyone, except of course the exchanges and the original pumpers/dumpers

edit: i guess i should clear it up, i have no problem with mintpal from a 'technological' standpoint... their exchange seems to not be down as much as cryptorush, my issues are from an ethical standpoint.

0 Buy Orders on FCK/BTC 

Go home, you're an ignoramus.

Yak, what is your problem with mintpal? It's much better than shitty cryptorush (it's down now again BTW). A week ago 20.000 votes were enough to be there, but there was no unequivocal response or reaction from devs as far as I remember.

Borrowing your own words that you've used :

I suggest you go back to school so you learn to read, or if you CAN read, you at least should learn to understand on WHAT you read before claiming coins to be scams.
the premine has been already explained in first post and it is transparently shown for everyone to see. We aren't here to keep it ourselves.

Can you read? If yes, please do it careffuly

Everything is explained in first post..

GO HOME YOU ARE DRUNK . Too much premine ! 3% . This is a SCAM !

Mintpal looks solid. It's definitly better than cryptorush and attract more and more people.

Would be great to see fckbanks there, so ladies and gents, please keep on voting

i just think that cryptsy will never add fck

if i have to choose between  cryptsy and mintpal i will choose cryptsy, off course.

if you guys actually *WANT* that you should be fighting *FOR* that.

time to work on the new layout more...

voting on those sites that are asking for money seems pretty 'counter productive'
vote with your emails to the exchanges themselves or their twitter accounts if you want something... thats how things get done, not by pressing a 'vote' button, or paying a site for 'extra votes'

in my opinion the fact that a site like mintpal with basically no volume is getting thousands of dollars of 'votes' is a massive joke.

i'm actually ashamed someone used bribe votes for fckbanks on the votes there, because when we actually do get on it i would have rather done it without any bribe votes

A huge 1 satoshi buy pool, and a 2 satoshi sell wall as it is kind makes it undilutable at the moment.

I keep voting to keep it closer to the top as another way of promoting interest.  They way the vote can be bought on mintpal (or rigged as one can say) already brought in a couple of questionable and/or brand new coins which seem were only created for quick pump and dump...

Because of this I also don't care that the coin is on xnigma or any other small exchange.  In my mind, having a coin at hundreds of exchanges just dilutes the value (not that healthy competition isn't a good thing and having lower commission than cryptsy also helps).

I'll stick with fck, thanks.