Re: how do I make new threads? - page 6.

erikalui

legendary

Activity: 2632

Merit: 1094

Quote from: Quickseller on April 22, 2015, 02:19:39 PM

I'm sorry where did I say that ACCTSeller is not my alt?

You never admitted to it and asked people to prove. You should have openly said that yes, I am an alt and it's not against the rules. You chose to hide it. Having an alt is nothing wrong. It feels weird when you try to hide such a small fact. In this thread: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/quickselleracctseller-abusing-trust-system-here-we-go-again-1032755 it appeared as if two people were talking.

I have no issues with you as the OP also had used a bot and in this case as well the OP isn't trustworthy but since you are, it dint look good for you to not admit this fact. I have nothing against you but what I felt, I wrote.

Quickseller

copper member

Activity: 2996

Merit: 2374

I'm sorry where did I say that ACCTSeller is not my alt?

erikalui

legendary

Activity: 2632

Merit: 1094

Quote from: Quickseller on April 22, 2015, 08:21:36 AM

Okay I know I told you that I am ACCTSeller so there is no point in denying that lol. It is a pretty well known fact anyway.

Sorry to say but Quickseller, you have been lying all this time by saying you don't own the ACCTSeller account all this while and I believed that may be that other account is owned by another person. You being a reputed member here, it looks bad for you to lie. Especially because you work as an escrow, a honest and trustworthy person.

If you can lie for such a small and irrelevant fact as having an alternate account is allowed, how can you expect others to trust you? You can work as an escrow for members here and then calmly deny that you don't know them if they have dealt with you only in PMs.

I am not saying you are not trustworthy. Definitely you are if Badbear and other members are saying but now you sound like a Liar. It's wrong and now whatever you say might only seem to be lies. Sorry.

Quickseller

copper member

Activity: 2996

Merit: 2374

1- asking you to start a ponzi was to build trust to find your default trust account that you claimed to have
2- the reason/purpose that people have alts is that they are not known to be the same person. Most alts (I assume) are not public.
3- it is not my fault that people wanted to buy what I was selling from multiple accounts. It is a free market.
4- untrue and BS
5- backing out of escrow is scammy behavior. It would be incorrect to not have neg'ed him
5- the only people who claim trust abuse are scammers. I don't abuse the trust system.

You are/were targeting the Russians on here lol. This is a huge market as a lot of people on here have Bitcoin (who would have guessed) and are greedy morons who are more then willing to throw away their money into Ponzis.

Edit: by your own admission, the reason you opened this thread is because you couldn't real me into joining the side of scammers so don't you think trying to get me removed from default trust kind of is a moot point? You think I should be removed because I wouldn't turn scammer?

Twipple

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 250

Quote from: Quickseller on April 22, 2015, 09:40:36 AM

Right. I sold trust for the $1 minimum amount I get from acting as escrow. /s

I hope you realize just how moronic that sounds buddy.

No thats not my argument. My argument was , that just like the account Pagalwana, my account was bought after someone defaulted on a loan, and it was auctioned by Ume(who I started the scam accusation against). 2 months later you gave it a negative trust, to which I provided you all the proof of everything.
But you never listened or replied or even cared about it.

The same thing happened with the account pagalwana, and irfanpak contacted you for the account sale. You readily agreed with him to sell his account and removed your negative trust.

I am now in a losing situation on both ends, as I bought the account from Ume, and it was also me who started the scam accusation against him from my original account. And because of your negative trust on this account, Ume got to know who was the buyer for this account, and will not agree to refund me the money.

Quickseller

copper member

Activity: 2996

Merit: 2374

Quote from: Twipple on April 22, 2015, 09:22:57 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: darkangel11 on April 22, 2015, 09:10:56 AM

Quote from: Quickseller on April 22, 2015, 08:21:36 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: Quickseller on April 22, 2015, 08:15:08 AM

Oh yea. I was trying to build up trust to find the default trust account that you claim to have. Didn't work though.

I think it is pretty clear that I was right about investcryptos is your though.

ALSO, Why don't you admit that you are ACCTSeller's alt, before I have to go dig for proof of that to?

Okay I know I told you that I am ACCTSeller so there is no point in denying that lol. It is a pretty well known fact anyway.

You gave tspacepilot negative trust using both Quickseller and ACCTSeller for saying that ACCTSeller was your account. Does that qualify as trust abuse? Are you planning to apologize?

Yes, that is trust abuse.

He probably wants that account so he negs it, offers a price from one of his alts, and then sells it.

I wouldn't be surprised if thats the actual case. I recently saw Quickseller negative rep another account pagalwana,, who also defaulted on a loan , and after a scam accusation negative repped the account.
But after the person who loaned him the amount contacted QUickseller to sell it, probably for the escrow fees, Quickseller agreed to remove the negative trust and escrowed the sale for the seller.

I haven't offered the same deal or to pay him some money for it, probably why he wouldn't remove it, despite providing all the proof, and the negative trust given by him a month later after I bought the account.

Right. I sold trust for the $1 minimum amount I get from acting as escrow. /s

I hope you realize just how moronic that sounds buddy.

Quote from: Blazr on April 22, 2015, 09:38:14 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Australian? Interesting

Yes literally the iPad screenshot you just posted shows an iPad with the timezone set to Australia.

All of the BTC you got from scamming wouldn't even cover a retainer for a good lawyer if you were ever arrested. You're young and ignorant of how the world works.

he does make a lot of mistakes and anytime he tries to start a new scam it is pretty obvious.

Blazr

hero member

Activity: 882

Merit: 1006

Quote from: ?? on ??

Australian? Interesting

Yes literally the iPad screenshot you just posted shows an iPad with the timezone set to Australia, you've left evidence that identifies you all over the internet and everytime you post you seem to continually provide additional evidence.

All of the BTC you got from scamming wouldn't even cover a retainer for a good lawyer if you were ever arrested. You're young and ignorant of how the world works.

Quickseller

copper member

Activity: 2996

Merit: 2374

Alright buddy whatever you say. Good luck with your next scam.

achow101

staff

Activity: 3458

Merit: 6793

Just writing some code

Sorry I have a little question for asking you guys.
If I vote who will do it? By the way I think QuickSeller is trusted escrow from scam Ponzi signature campaign he can send fund to participants after OP scamed.

Quickseller

copper member

Activity: 2996

Merit: 2374

Yea because you would just send funds to the site then mix the coins and re deposit the same coins. Or considering how much you have stolen in the past you could have just deposited your own funds into the site from various addresses.

I never said that you sent me malware but you have sent several gambling sites malware in the past, there was proof posted in your scam accusation against fair proof (who you also sent malware to).

Quote from: Blazr on April 22, 2015, 09:20:20 AM

Isn't this the Australian ponzi runner guy? I forget his name. Like most of what he says, his claims to have a DefaultTrusted account are hot air.

It's sad how all these kids from HackForums are coming over to BTCTalk. RIP.

yes it is the Australian HYIP scammer. He is moreia aka spoodermen aka many other accounts (I am aware of ~10 accounts, but he claims to have ~15).

He has scammed for 10+ btc multiple times.

He has said that he got the default trust account "accidentally" so newly added accounts are being looked into. At this point I am starting to think the claim of a default trust account is a red herring however it was told to me in a way that was not confrontational.

Twipple

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 250

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: darkangel11 on April 22, 2015, 09:10:56 AM

Quote from: Quickseller on April 22, 2015, 08:21:36 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: Quickseller on April 22, 2015, 08:15:08 AM

Oh yea. I was trying to build up trust to find the default trust account that you claim to have. Didn't work though.

I think it is pretty clear that I was right about investcryptos is your though.

ALSO, Why don't you admit that you are ACCTSeller's alt, before I have to go dig for proof of that to?

Okay I know I told you that I am ACCTSeller so there is no point in denying that lol. It is a pretty well known fact anyway.

You gave tspacepilot negative trust using both Quickseller and ACCTSeller for saying that ACCTSeller was your account. Does that qualify as trust abuse? Are you planning to apologize?

Yes, that is trust abuse.

He probably wants that account so he negs it, offers a price from one of his alts, and then sells it.

I wouldn't be surprised if thats the actual case. I recently saw Quickseller negative rep another account pagalwana,, who also defaulted on a loan , and after a scam accusation negative repped the account.
But after the person who loaned him the amount contacted QUickseller to sell it, probably for the escrow fees, Quickseller agreed to remove the negative trust and escrowed the sale for the seller.

I haven't offered the same deal or to pay him some money for it, probably why he wouldn't remove it, despite providing all the proof, and the negative trust given by him a month later after I bought the account.

Blazr

hero member

Activity: 882

Merit: 1006

Isn't this the Australian ponzi runner kid? I forget his name. Like most of what he says, his claims to have a DefaultTrusted account are hot air, all of his accounts were really crappy IIRC.

It's sad how all these kids from HackForums are coming over to BTCTalk. RIP.

Twipple

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 250

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: Quickseller on April 22, 2015, 08:15:08 AM

Oh yea. I was trying to build up trust to find the default trust account that you claim to have. Didn't work though.

I think it is pretty clear that I was right about investcryptos is your though.

Nice excuse... But looks pretty legitimate to me. you think I'm just going to get down on my knees because you mentioned "partnership" and "ponzi" in the same sentence?
And accuse me with "investcryptos" all you want...even I am not dumb enough to "pump" a site so quickly let alone use a blatant copy of CryptoDouble. Any of my previous sites had different designs and structures, that's just plain stupidity lol

This is ironic too, Quickseller recently neg trusted my account , when clearly I bought it through an auction , and provided all proof. The original owner dumped the account after taking a loan. Even then QUickseller didn't remove the trust, despite me providing all the trust.

With him doing all these things to catch scams and acting like a scammer himself, could be too much power given if he intends to run a scam in real, and he can simply give it as an excuse, that he was trying to catch a scammer and was not actually looking to scam.

Quickseller

copper member

Activity: 2996

Merit: 2374

I also don't see the point of publishing the chat logs considering I have denied nothing lol. But whatever floats your boat.

Quote from: darkangel11 on April 22, 2015, 09:10:56 AM

Quote from: Quickseller on April 22, 2015, 08:21:36 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: Quickseller on April 22, 2015, 08:15:08 AM

Oh yea. I was trying to build up trust to find the default trust account that you claim to have. Didn't work though.

I think it is pretty clear that I was right about investcryptos is your though.

ALSO, Why don't you admit that you are ACCTSeller's alt, before I have to go dig for proof of that to?

Okay I know I told you that I am ACCTSeller so there is no point in denying that lol. It is a pretty well known fact anyway.

You gave tspacepilot negative trust using both Quickseller and ACCTSeller for saying that ACCTSeller was your account. Does that qualify as trust abuse? Are you planning to apologize?

no it does not. One negative was given from ACCTSeller because the infraction was not something that qualified for a trade with caution tag, however once I found additional information that showed he scammed I decided that his scam qualified to be severe enough that he should have a trade with caution tag.

darkangel11

legendary

Activity: 2478

Merit: 1360

Don't let others control your BTC -> self custody

Quote from: Quickseller on April 22, 2015, 08:21:36 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: Quickseller on April 22, 2015, 08:15:08 AM

Oh yea. I was trying to build up trust to find the default trust account that you claim to have. Didn't work though.

I think it is pretty clear that I was right about investcryptos is your though.

ALSO, Why don't you admit that you are ACCTSeller's alt, before I have to go dig for proof of that to?

Okay I know I told you that I am ACCTSeller so there is no point in denying that lol. It is a pretty well known fact anyway.

You gave tspacepilot negative trust using both Quickseller and ACCTSeller for saying that ACCTSeller was your account. Does that qualify as trust abuse? Are you planning to apologize?

Quickseller

copper member

Activity: 2996

Merit: 2374

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: Quickseller on April 22, 2015, 08:48:14 AM

I guess we were trying to reel eachother in, with it working for neither of us lol. I am fairly sure that you would have tried sending me malware with promises of Ev positive gambling strategy which is mathematically impossible if you are using a provably fair gambling site.

Like I said, I'm sorry you weren't able to scam more from your new site prior to calling it out as an obvious scam.

Wtf..
SENDING YOU MALWARE LOL...I didn't send you a single email attachment?
And my +EV strategy is not even called a +EV strategy, it's just a good dice method that happens to work across the board. Its not a sequence either, it's just my experience in side helps me through my gameplay...

Stop twisting words, you're full of shit. I'll post those email logs also when I'm back on PC and off mobile

you may have not said it is positive EV however that is the only way you can reliably make money on a dice site, otherwise with as much as you have claimed to have gambled you would have almost certainly have lost money, not be up 25 btc as you claim. The only other "explanation" is either gamblers fallacy or you somehow were cheating.

You have a history of sending out malware so I only assumed that your ultimate plan was to send malware.

well for those of us who don't routinely devolop/use/run ponzi sites, some of us don't know where to look to find how much they claim to have invested in their site. Plus I think it is fair to say that the sites numbers are BS which is something you have a history of.

Quickseller

copper member

Activity: 2996

Merit: 2374

I guess we were trying to reel eachother in, with it working for neither of us lol. I am fairly sure that you would have tried sending me malware with promises of Ev positive gambling strategy which is mathematically impossible if you are using a provably fair gambling site.

Like I said, I'm sorry you weren't able to scam more from your new site prior to calling it out as an obvious scam.

Quickseller

copper member

Activity: 2996

Merit: 2374

I've never publicly stated we are the same person, the only people that made the claim publicly were trying to cause me problems so I wanted to make them look like an idiot. Plenty of people are aware though.

I'm not sure what the point of this is if that site really isn't yours Wink

Quickseller

copper member

Activity: 2996

Merit: 2374

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: Quickseller on April 22, 2015, 08:15:08 AM

Oh yea. I was trying to build up trust to find the default trust account that you claim to have. Didn't work though.

I think it is pretty clear that I was right about investcryptos is your though.

ALSO, Why don't you admit that you are ACCTSeller's alt, before I have to go dig for proof of that to?

Okay I know I told you that I am ACCTSeller so there is no point in denying that lol. It is a pretty well known fact anyway.

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: Quickseller on April 22, 2015, 08:15:08 AM

Oh yea. I was trying to build up trust to find the default trust account that you claim to have. Didn't work though.

I think it is pretty clear that I was right about investcryptos is your though.

Nice excuse... But looks pretty legitimate to me. you think I'm just going to get down on my knees because you mentioned "partnership" and "ponzi" in the same sentence?
And accuse me with "investcryptos" all you want...even I am not dumb enough to "pump" a site so quickly let alone use a blatant copy of CryptoDouble. Any of my previous sites had different designs and structures, that's just plain stupidity lol

You used a copy of your last site haha.

Either way, sorry for calling out your scam so soon after you started it. Better luck next time

Quickseller

copper member

Activity: 2996

Merit: 2374

Oh yea. I was trying to build up trust to find the default trust account that you claim to have. Didn't work though.

I think it is pretty clear that I was right about investcryptos is your though.

Topic: Re: how do I make new threads? - page 6. (Read 5812 times)