...
Cause and effect - whatever your grudge is against actmyname - let it go, it's burning you up.
Next.
Topic: Re: Timelord2067 vs Foxpup - page 2. (Read 1001 times)
Cause and effect - whatever your grudge is against actmyname - let it go, it's burning you up.
Next.
(interestingly all of that trust/distrust Foxpup did at that time seems to have disappeared from the BPIP site)
What are you even talking about?I'd like to think I had a hand in his downfall.
To prove a point, I removed my distrust to bring him back to DT1 (0) then slap him down to DT1 (-1) once again.
Truly, you have the maturity and detachment of a wizened sage on a mountaintop somewhere. To prove a point, I removed my distrust to bring him back to DT1 (0) then slap him down to DT1 (-1) once again.
By trusting actmyname, Foxpup gave me negative trust.
When Foxpup was asked by me why he gave me negative trust he went all Butt Hurt TM and amongst other things started this thread. His reaction showed he is untrustworthy and so I reluctantly gave him negative trust. (Check this if you don't believe I didn't just give him retaliatory negative trust)
Today Foxpup slipped from DT1 (0) to DT1 (-1). (interestingly all of that trust/distrust Foxpup did at that time seems to have disappeared from the BPIP site)
I'd like to think I had a hand in his downfall.
To prove a point, I removed my distrust to bring him back to DT1 (0) then slap him down to DT1 (-1) once again.
Just in case anyone missed seeing this post elsewhere, I'll leave you with this parting shot:
The ones taking your money to wear your avatar - they're the imaginary "friends"...
Time to let it go and lock this thread.
When Foxpup was asked by me why he gave me negative trust he went all Butt Hurt TM and amongst other things started this thread. His reaction showed he is untrustworthy and so I reluctantly gave him negative trust. (Check this if you don't believe I didn't just give him retaliatory negative trust)
Today Foxpup slipped from DT1 (0) to DT1 (-1). (interestingly all of that trust/distrust Foxpup did at that time seems to have disappeared from the BPIP site)
I'd like to think I had a hand in his downfall.
To prove a point, I removed my distrust to bring him back to DT1 (0) then slap him down to DT1 (-1) once again.
Just in case anyone missed seeing this post elsewhere, I'll leave you with this parting shot:
I trust actmyname! (and foxpup distrusts me for that reason!)
Whatever. Just don't get mad at me when I refuse to start trusting you if/when you spontaneously decide to distrust actmyname because you linked him to some nefarious conspiracy that exists only in your own mind. The ones taking your money to wear your avatar - they're the imaginary "friends"...
Time to let it go and lock this thread.
Let it go.
So neither Foxpup nor hilarious leave you a rating, you give both of them a frivolous rating complaining about FUD in return (including this topic, which is categorically not FUD and simply a statement of facts), and then complain that people aren't "letting it go".That's some peculiar logic, I must say.
o_e_l_e_o perhaps you should go back and actually *read* what has been left on hilarious' trust wall/feedback... He makes a claim against me, yet offers no proof - and you're going to give me negative on that basis? I'm really quaking in my boots.
You say that the claim that you think he is Quickseller is FUD, and then end your feedback asking him why he keeps acting like Quickseller. You honestly don't see the issue there? You also seem angered that he offers no proof, and then you immediately make a claim about him and yet offer no proof. I also never said I was going to give you negative trust.In misquoting me you have managed to trim off the last three words of the feedback.
"Let it go."
Without provocation hilarious has come on to "remind everyone" what he claims I said, yet even now offers no proof.
In much the same way quickseller's "pill addiction" or "collusion to defraud" or similar threads just keep getting bumped long after everyone else agrees the issue has passed.
No proof offered by Hilarious and you didn't ask him to prove his claim.
Let it go.
Carry on.
I also never said I was going to give you negative trust.
Timelord2067 has his own lingo for trust lists and ratings, which is irritating AF. I think he calls trust ratings a "wall", and exclusion == negative, or something like that - I can't keep up.
o_e_l_e_o perhaps you should go back and actually *read* what has been left on hilarious' trust wall/feedback... He makes a claim against me, yet offers no proof - and you're going to give me negative on that basis? I'm really quaking in my boots.
You say that the claim that you think he is Quickseller is FUD, and then end your feedback asking him why he keeps acting like Quickseller. You honestly don't see the issue there? You also seem angered that he offers no proof, and then you immediately make a claim about him and yet offer no proof. I also never said I was going to give you negative trust.
On which date did you...
...any of you contact me to air your concerns?
I usually don't contact people before making changes to my Trust list, but if you check the links in my previous post, you'll see it's not about you. ...any of you contact me to air your concerns?
I don't control who they trust or distrust. For example, you earlier brought up my distrust of actmyname, even though he is trusted by everyone in my avatar campaign. 
I really have no idea why they trust someone I distrust, but that's okay, because I also don't particularly care.
For the record: I removed him from my Trust list last October, because I don't want to endorse the empty negative feedback he left. That still doesn't mean I don't trust his judgement, it's just the compromise I mentioned earlier. I really have no idea why they trust someone I distrust, but that's okay, because I also don't particularly care.Pardon?
On which date did you...
...any of you contact me to air your concerns?
And are you really expecting me to troll/lurk in other people's threads and trust/feedback posts in-case they *might* give a questionable post?
o_e_l_e_o perhaps you should go back and actually *read* what has been left on hilarious' trust wall/feedback... He makes a claim against me, yet offers no proof - and you're going to give me negative on that basis? I'm really quaking in my boots.
Carry on.
Foxup enjoys wanking everyday thats why she forgot to reply to the thread,she cant catchup which is why she created this thread.
I do indeed enjoy wanking every day, and recommend that you try it; it helps clear the mind, which will allow you to see that I had little to say in the original thread because that thread is not about me, and that Timelord2067's attempts to make it about me were off-topic, hence why I created this thread.Incidentally, my multifarious sexual proclivities are likewise off-topic in this thread, so please create a new thread if you wish to discuss them further.
Foxup enjoys wanking everyday thats why she forgot to reply to the thread,she cant catchup which is why she created this thread.
Four of five posters are in the chipmixer signature campaign - $24 worth of posts @ $6 per post.
I can pretty much guarantee DarkStar_ will not count any of the above posts as substantial enough to warrant payment. My post was (deliberately) less than 100 character minimum. Regardless, all of us are well above the 50 post maximum, so they wouldn't be counted anyway.Four of five posters carry the same profile pic (paid for by the OP).
If at any point Foxpup tried to use said avatar deal to manipulate my trust list or ratings, not only would I remove said avatar but I'd likely also open a scam accusation against him for trying to buy trust.Four out of the five of you good people on DT distrust me.
I don't distrust you yet, but your frivolous ratings on Foxpup and hilarious' trust pages which I've just been made aware of are making a pretty strong case for it. If and when I do distrust you, know that I reached that decision entirely of my own volition.And for the record, if I distrust you I will also distrust your alt: I'm distrusting you as a person, not the specific account you happen to be using at the time. I'd call that "common sense" rather than "immature".
For the record: I removed him from my Trust list last October,
Sorry, I guess I haven't been keeping close track of such things (thus proving my earlier point about not caring who you trust). I don't control who they trust or distrust. For example, you earlier brought up my distrust of actmyname, even though he is trusted by everyone in my avatar campaign. I really have no idea why they trust someone I distrust, but that's okay, because I also don't particularly care.
For the record: I removed him from my Trust list last October, because I don't want to endorse the empty negative feedback he left. That still doesn't mean I don't trust his judgement, it's just the compromise I mentioned earlier. I really have no idea why they trust someone I distrust, but that's okay, because I also don't particularly care.That's all you can muster is four replies in three days?
I didn't create this thread to muster replies from people who agree with me. I created this thread so that you could reply without risk of your replies being deleted because they were off-topic in the original thread (no doubt you'd find a way to blame that on me as well).Four of five posters are in the chipmixer signature campaign - $24 worth of posts @ $6 per post.
I know nothing about the ChipMixer campaign, other than that they seem to hold their members to the same high standard that I do.Four of five posters carry the same profile pic (paid for by the OP) (how much is that I wonder?).
They don't get paid per post (I'm against such campaigns, contributing as they do to forum spam), but rather a flat weekly or monthly rate, negotiated on an individual basis, and averaging $120 per week.Four out of the five of you good people on DT distrust me.
I don't control who they trust or distrust. For example, you earlier brought up my distrust of actmyname, even though he is trusted by everyone in my avatar campaign. I really have no idea why they trust someone I distrust, but that's okay, because I also don't particularly care.Who else thinks this is very mature of the OP?
I try to distrust all known and proven alts of users I distrust, and I only recently found out about yours. Had I known about your alt earlier, I would have distrusted it earlier. What's immature about that? Have you any other alts I need to distrust while I'm at it? The uniforms add to the drama..
What was that you just said in the other thread - you're not involved?
Carry on.
That's all you can muster is four replies in three days?
Four of five posters are in the chipmixer signature campaign - $24 worth of posts @ $6 per post.
Four of five posters carry the same profile pic (paid for by the OP) (how much is that I wonder?).
Four out of the five of you good people on DT distrust me.
Four of five posters are in the chipmixer signature campaign - $24 worth of posts @ $6 per post.
Four of five posters carry the same profile pic (paid for by the OP) (how much is that I wonder?).
Four out of the five of you good people on DT distrust me.
The uniforms add to the drama..
That's all you can muster is four replies in three days?
Four of five posters are in the chipmixer signature campaign - $24 worth of posts @ $6 per post.
Four of five posters carry the same profile pic (paid for by the OP) (how much is that I wonder?).
Four out of the five of you good people on DT distrust me.
Who else thinks this is very mature of the OP?
Neither do I...
Carry on.
Four of five posters are in the chipmixer signature campaign - $24 worth of posts @ $6 per post.
Four of five posters carry the same profile pic (paid for by the OP) (how much is that I wonder?).
Four out of the five of you good people on DT distrust me.
Who else thinks this is very mature of the OP?
Quote
Trust list for: Timelord2o67 (Trust: neutral) (5 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP) (created 2020-01-25_Sat_05.12h)
Back to index
Timelord2o67 Trusts these users' judgement:
-
Timelord2o67 Distrusts these users' judgement:
-
Timelord2o67's judgement is Trusted by:
1. Timelord2067 (Trust: +9 / =3 / -1) (DT1 (-12) 329 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
~Timelord2o67's judgement is Distrusted by:
1. NEW Foxpup (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 836 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
Source: LoyceV's Trust list viewer.
Get your own Trust list in BBCode at loyce.club/trust.
Back to index
Timelord2o67 Trusts these users' judgement:
-
Timelord2o67 Distrusts these users' judgement:
-
Timelord2o67's judgement is Trusted by:
1. Timelord2067 (Trust: +9 / =3 / -1) (
~Timelord2o67's judgement is Distrusted by:
1. NEW Foxpup (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 836 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
Source: LoyceV's Trust list viewer.
Get your own Trust list in BBCode at loyce.club/trust.
Neither do I...
Carry on.
It turns out I'm being subliminally forced to do all these dirty things for Foxpup.
I'm not being forced at all. I do them willingly. 
BTW - I see you pay suchmoon to wear you profile pic. Did you also sweeten the deal by paying suchmoon to also distrust me? (Be honest now)
suchmoon normally flies off the handle with his "last straw" comment every other day at randoms then reads further and calms down, but if you paid suchmoon to "distrust me" then that would explain his recent change in behaviour.
suchmoon normally flies off the handle with his "last straw" comment every other day at randoms then reads further and calms down, but if you paid suchmoon to "distrust me" then that would explain his recent change in behaviour.
Oh crap... It turns out I'm being subliminally forced to do all these dirty things for Foxpup. I knew this avatar deal was too good to be true.
o_e_l_e_o, get out while you still can. LoyceV is too far gone.
Jump to: