Find a new Campaign
BitcoinPoker.gg link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bitcoinpokergg-signature-campaign-closed-1018585
Payment period: BiWeekly
Minimum posts: 30 posts
Payments: FM: 0.04BTC(10 slots) SM BTC: 0.065 BTC(10 slots) HM: 0.08 BTC(5 slots)
Escrow: Quickseller
Topic: Re: Updated Overview of Bitcointalk Signature-Ad Campaigns - page 125. (Read 17849 times)
CryptoVPN campaign is only 60/30m posts now needed. No longer 80/40m. If you do 30/m you get 1/2 the full monthly payment. The classifications and the amounts are still the same thou.
If you want to change the table on the 1st page with this new info...
global moderator
Activity: 3990
Merit: 2713
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
is there any signature campaign that allow negative trust user with senior rank
i want to join a signature campaign and make few bucks
i want to join a signature campaign and make few bucks
Does the one you're in now not? Think I saw some people with neg trust say they still get paid from it. I think Luckybit might take them on a case by case basis but there other rules can be strict.
is there any signature campaign that allow negative trust user with senior rank
i want to join a signature campaign and make few bucks
i want to join a signature campaign and make few bucks
No there is none.
One new Campaign
AllInCrypto (AllInCrypto Sig Campaign)
Payment period: BiWeekly
Minimum posts: 30 posts
Payments: FM: 0.04 SM BTC: 0.06 BTC HM: 0.075 BTC
Escrow: Yes, Blazedout419
is there any signature campaign that allow negative trust user with senior rank
i want to join a signature campaign and make few bucks
i want to join a signature campaign and make few bucks
I didn't know why it was set as an untrusted, as it only had increased the payment rates, but I can confirm now I have received the payment
"payment not yet confirmed" is not equal to "untrusted", so you guys don't need to argue here, and when you guys get first payment of the new Fj campaign, OP will move it to Payment confirmed.
Although we all know FJ sig campaign pays well, michell has his own estimation.
Code:
[b]BitcoinPoker[/b] ([url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1018585.0]Thread[/url])
[i]Payment period:[/i] BiWeekly
[i]Minimum posts:[/i] 30
[i]Payments:[/i] FM: 0.04 SM: 0.065 HM: 0.08
[u][i]Escrow[/i][/u]: Yes, Quickseller (well, it depends if Quickseller is making payouts too)
[i]Miscellaneous:[/i] Other information that might be important
[i]Payment period:[/i] BiWeekly
[i]Minimum posts:[/i] 30
[i]Payments:[/i] FM: 0.04 SM: 0.065 HM: 0.08
[u][i]Escrow[/i][/u]: Yes, Quickseller (well, it depends if Quickseller is making payouts too)
[i]Miscellaneous:[/i] Other information that might be important
You have fortunejack listed as PNYC (payment not yet confirmed) however I understand that they had a long standing signature deal not long ago that paid out on time for several months. Is there a reason why it is not listed as "A" (active)?
FortuneJack previous campaign has ended, what you saw on the OP is a new campaign with 0.04 weekly and a bonus of 0.04 for bonus if you join up for 4 weeks period, and this campaign hasnt really payout yet so it is right to list them as PYNC although today is their payday, if they pay then they will be moved to active
Starting 'new' campaign doesn't mean you're not trustworthy anymore. If FJ have a long history of running the campaign without any payment issues, then it should be marked as 'active'.
They could have just used phrase 'new rules' instead of 'new campaign' and they would've be shown as 'active'.
I believe mitchell doesnt list it as active was because it is based on this reason ,although FortuneJack never had any issue with sig campaign payment but it is still a fact that this "new campaign" hasnt paid out yet, so PYNC is a correct term for this
BUt there is no point in debating this further, because as I said, today is their payday, so it they pay it out today, they will be move to Active, so no biggies for this
I didn't know why it was set as an untrusted, as it only had increased the payment rates, but I can confirm now I have received the payment
penalize? not really as FortuneJack doesnt get any disadvantage due to being put in the PYNC for 1 week IMO, as they only accepts Sr. Member and upper rank, and their campaign have been around for quite some time, people should already knew their campaign are trusted, and Personally I dont even realize that they are in PYNC until you bring this up so yeah
and also as I have stated, today is their payday, they will be move back to active sig campaign soon after they pay
Yes, penalised. It's not severe disadvantage, but anyone new, without much experience with sig campaigns could see it as untrusted and risky.
And it's not solely about FJ but about principle. Bit-x is about to start 'new campaign' in mid April, possibly with monthly payments, so if the same logic is applied they'll stuck with 'PNYC' badge for the whole month.
I believe mitchell doesnt list it as active was because it is based on this reason ,although FortuneJack never had any issue with sig campaign payment but it is still a fact that this "new campaign" hasnt paid out yet, so PYNC is a correct term for this
BUt there is no point in debating this further, because as I said, today is their payday, so it they pay it out today, they will be move to Active, so no biggies for this
As Quickseller wrote, it's not actually new campaign. They just called it 'new campaign' and got somewhat penalised with 'PNYC' mark.
Would it really make any difference trust-wise if they change the wording to 'new thread' (instead of 'new campaign')?
penalize? not really as FortuneJack doesnt get any disadvantage due to being put in the PYNC for 1 week IMO, as they only accepts Sr. Member and upper rank, and their campaign have been around for quite some time, people should already knew their campaign are trusted, and Personally I dont even realize that they are in PYNC until you bring this up so yeah
and also as I have stated, today is their payday, they will be move back to active sig campaign soon after they pay
You have fortunejack listed as PNYC (payment not yet confirmed) however I understand that they had a long standing signature deal not long ago that paid out on time for several months. Is there a reason why it is not listed as "A" (active)?
FortuneJack previous campaign has ended, what you saw on the OP is a new campaign with 0.04 weekly and a bonus of 0.04 for bonus if you join up for 4 weeks period, and this campaign hasnt really payout yet so it is right to list them as PYNC although today is their payday, if they pay then they will be moved to active
Starting 'new' campaign doesn't mean you're not trustworthy anymore. If FJ have a long history of running the campaign without any payment issues, then it should be marked as 'active'.
They could have just used phrase 'new rules' instead of 'new campaign' and they would've be shown as 'active'.
By the new thread logic, bitstars should always be in PNYC.
Exactly.
I believe mitchell doesnt list it as active was because it is based on this reason ,although FortuneJack never had any issue with sig campaign payment but it is still a fact that this "new campaign" hasnt paid out yet, so PYNC is a correct term for this
BUt there is no point in debating this further, because as I said, today is their payday, so it they pay it out today, they will be move to Active, so no biggies for this
As Quickseller wrote, it's not actually new campaign. They just called it 'new campaign' and got somewhat penalised with 'PNYC' mark.
Would it really make any difference trust-wise if they change the wording to 'new thread' (instead of 'new campaign')?
You have fortunejack listed as PNYC (payment not yet confirmed) however I understand that they had a long standing signature deal not long ago that paid out on time for several months. Is there a reason why it is not listed as "A" (active)?
FortuneJack previous campaign has ended, what you saw on the OP is a new campaign with 0.04 weekly and a bonus of 0.04 for bonus if you join up for 4 weeks period, and this campaign hasnt really payout yet so it is right to list them as PYNC although today is their payday, if they pay then they will be moved to active
Starting 'new' campaign doesn't mean you're not trustworthy anymore. If FJ have a long history of running the campaign without any payment issues, then it should be marked as 'active'.
They could have just used phrase 'new rules' instead of 'new campaign' and they would've be shown as 'active'.
By the new thread logic, bitstars should always be in PNYC.
No I don't think you are right, because the new signature campaign is always managed by the same "team" so there will not exist any type of problem (if they will stay honest).
You have fortunejack listed as PNYC (payment not yet confirmed) however I understand that they had a long standing signature deal not long ago that paid out on time for several months. Is there a reason why it is not listed as "A" (active)?
FortuneJack previous campaign has ended, what you saw on the OP is a new campaign with 0.04 weekly and a bonus of 0.04 for bonus if you join up for 4 weeks period, and this campaign hasnt really payout yet so it is right to list them as PYNC although today is their payday, if they pay then they will be moved to active
Starting 'new' campaign doesn't mean you're not trustworthy anymore. If FJ have a long history of running the campaign without any payment issues, then it should be marked as 'active'.
They could have just used phrase 'new rules' instead of 'new campaign' and they would've be shown as 'active'.
By the new thread logic, bitstars should always be in PNYC.
You have fortunejack listed as PNYC (payment not yet confirmed) however I understand that they had a long standing signature deal not long ago that paid out on time for several months. Is there a reason why it is not listed as "A" (active)?
FortuneJack previous campaign has ended, what you saw on the OP is a new campaign with 0.04 weekly and a bonus of 0.04 for bonus if you join up for 4 weeks period, and this campaign hasnt really payout yet so it is right to list them as PYNC although today is their payday, if they pay then they will be moved to active
Starting 'new' campaign doesn't mean you're not trustworthy anymore. If FJ have a long history of running the campaign without any payment issues, then it should be marked as 'active'.
They could have just used phrase 'new rules' instead of 'new campaign' and they would've be shown as 'active'.
I believe mitchell doesnt list it as active was because it is based on this reason ,although FortuneJack never had any issue with sig campaign payment but it is still a fact that this "new campaign" hasnt paid out yet, so PYNC is a correct term for this
BUt there is no point in debating this further, because as I said, today is their payday, so it they pay it out today, they will be move to Active, so no biggies for this
You have fortunejack listed as PNYC (payment not yet confirmed) however I understand that they had a long standing signature deal not long ago that paid out on time for several months. Is there a reason why it is not listed as "A" (active)?
FortuneJack previous campaign has ended, what you saw on the OP is a new campaign with 0.04 weekly and a bonus of 0.04 for bonus if you join up for 4 weeks period, and this campaign hasnt really payout yet so it is right to list them as PYNC although today is their payday, if they pay then they will be moved to active
Starting 'new' campaign doesn't mean you're not trustworthy anymore. If FJ have a long history of running the campaign without any payment issues, then it should be marked as 'active'.
They could have just used phrase 'new rules' instead of 'new campaign' and they would've be shown as 'active'.
You have fortunejack listed as PNYC (payment not yet confirmed) however I understand that they had a long standing signature deal not long ago that paid out on time for several months. Is there a reason why it is not listed as "A" (active)?
FortuneJack previous campaign has ended, what you saw on the OP is a new campaign with 0.04 weekly and a bonus of 0.04 for bonus if you join up for 4 weeks period, and this campaign hasnt really payout yet so it is right to list them as PYNC although today is their payday, if they pay then they will be moved to active
Well I want to but how do I?
If you want to join bit-x, you can go to their thread and read what you need to do to join there https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bit-xcom-coinsbankcom-earn-bitcoins-by-posting-signature-campaign-877765
But there are campaigns that pay more, if you don't post much. Like the one I'm in for example. xD
See the first page to know where to go for all campaigns.
@Muhammed Zakir isn't he talking about the campaigns? lol
Tell me the one you are in then please and how to sign up
The one I'm in is from Coinichiwa, but is not taking more people for now. But there are others that pay the same or more per post and are open, like the ones from mbit or the one that was just posted from bitbingo lol.
But you have to go to their threads and read the rules and how to join. To join it is usually just making a post in their thread with your post count and your bitcoin address and using their signature, but some ask for more things.
BitBingo.io (Thread)
Payment period: Bi-weekly, every alternate Monday
Minimum posts: 30 constructive posts in 2 weeks
Payments: F: 0.06BTC per two weeks, S: 0.08BTC per two weeks, H/L: 0.10BTC per two weeks.
Escrow: No
Miscellaneous: Affiliate link allowed. Only constructive posts count. Non-English, Off-topic \ Local Section will not count.
CryptoVPN:
......
Minimum posts: 30/60 quality posts per month for half/full pay.
......
Miscellaneous: Provide affiliate name to get a higher percentage. Flexible payment, if number of quality posts is less than 30, they get rolled over, or part payment issued at a lower rate.
mBit Casino:
....
Miscellaneous: Provide affiliate name to get a fixed 5% revenue share on top. If the number of constructive posts falls short of 30, they are rolled over.
Payment period: Bi-weekly, every alternate Monday
Minimum posts: 30 constructive posts in 2 weeks
Payments: F: 0.06BTC per two weeks, S: 0.08BTC per two weeks, H/L: 0.10BTC per two weeks.
Escrow: No
Miscellaneous: Affiliate link allowed. Only constructive posts count. Non-English, Off-topic \ Local Section will not count.
CryptoVPN:
......
Minimum posts: 30/60 quality posts per month for half/full pay.
......
Miscellaneous: Provide affiliate name to get a higher percentage. Flexible payment, if number of quality posts is less than 30, they get rolled over, or part payment issued at a lower rate.
mBit Casino:
....
Miscellaneous: Provide affiliate name to get a fixed 5% revenue share on top. If the number of constructive posts falls short of 30, they are rolled over.
Well I want to but how do I?
If you want to join bit-x, you can go to their thread and read what you need to do to join there https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bit-xcom-coinsbankcom-earn-bitcoins-by-posting-signature-campaign-877765
But there are campaigns that pay more, if you don't post much. Like the one I'm in for example. xD
See the first page to know where to go for all campaigns.
@Muhammed Zakir isn't he talking about the campaigns? lol
Tell me the one you are in then please and how to sign up
Well I want to but how do I?
If you want to join bit-x, you can go to their thread and read what you need to do to join there https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bit-xcom-coinsbankcom-earn-bitcoins-by-posting-signature-campaign-877765
But there are campaigns that pay more, if you don't post much. Like the one I'm in for example. xD
See the first page to know where to go for all campaigns.
Wasn't he telling about buying BIT-X debit card?
LOL I just edited my post to ask the same! xD
I don't know. Maybe he will tell us lol.
Jump to: