Yes , we have understand ,.. but that sig. campaign is only a Ponzi scheme .
+ you lose credibility as you advertised a ponzi
+ you lose credibility by advertising gambling sites, while many people have their life destroyed by gambling?
Everyone that is not a baby is aware of the risks, not sure what is the problem
So where do you draw the line? Would you advertise anything if they pay you the most?
Gambling addiction has nothing to do with the subject. The gambling site is advertised as gambling site, people who use it know that they are gambling.
It can have destructive effect on some individuals, but so can pretty much any activity. Huge number of lives/families are affected by car crashes - following your logic, is advertising an obvious scam more innocent than car adverts?
But if you're desperate to compare to gambling campaigns, it would be the same as advertising a "1% house edge Dice" knowing that the house edge is in-fact 100%.
The only reasonable justification for putting this shit in the sig, in my opinion are:
1 - You don't have a spine/morals at all, you would do anything for a quick profit (including selling your own mother) - in such case no comment.
2- You trust that cryptcominer is somehow, in a magical way, legit - no comment.
3- You think that anyone who would fall for such obvious scam is a moron and deserve to lose to learn a lesson. In such case, why don't pull a scam yourself and earn more than a lousy campaign earnings?
4- You think that the scam is so obvious, that no-one will fall for that and the scammers will lose all the 'investment' (campaign expenses). This one imho is the only sensible 'line of defense'.
See their profile and their trust, no one can claim they don't know they are a ponzi. People that put their money there know where they are entering.