FXOpen is only best if you make less than 500 posts, but like bitcoininformation said, they're closed anyway. PD is the best open one now and the many people who flocked there over the last few days kinda shows it. Can't really see rates getting upped now though as promised with the competition dropping out of failing in many ways. Weekly payments are probably still coming according to one of Stunna's recent posts.
I read about the automation part. If they really do that, I will most likely join them. I really prefer weekly payments, even though their rates are quite low. I would love to join FXOpen, but they are full, sadly. 
Topic: Re: Updated Overview of Bitcointalk Signature-Ad Campaigns - page 273. (Read 17849 times)
global moderator
Activity: 3990
Merit: 2717
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
FXOpen is only best if you make less than 500 posts, but like bitcoininformation said, they're closed anyway. PD is the best open one now and the many people who flocked there over the last few days kinda shows it. Can't really see rates getting upped now though as promised with the competition dropping out of failing in many ways. Weekly payments are probably still coming according to one of Stunna's recent posts.
since updown has a lot complains (about not confirmed member, not pay right amount of payment, and bad communication with campaign member), i said fxopen is the best pay per post campaign for now, in term of rates. (and better communication)
They are full, so joining them is not possible. I already added the * to the UpDown.BT campaign, not much more that I can do.little correction in your table :
updown term : post/weekly -> post/monthly
Thank you, will change that now. updown term : post/weekly -> post/monthly
since updown has a lot complains (about not confirmed member, not pay right amount of payment, and bad communication with campaign member), i said fxopen is the best pay per post campaign for now, in term of rates. (and better communication)
i'm not surprised if someone want to buy spot from current member in their campaign
little correction in your table :
updown term : post/weekly -> post/monthly
i'm not surprised if someone want to buy spot from current member in their campaign
little correction in your table :
updown term : post/weekly -> post/monthly
is updown.bt full then or not? he said he was putting a cap on the max number of participants, but who has any idea how many are participating? i suggested to someone that they join, but then realized it wasn't clear.
I have no idea. I have asked them but I haven't received an answer for now. Will try to contact him on Monday/Tuesday. He/them aren't online in the weekend.I've seen a couple people post to the effect it's closed for new members. Can't be sure, but especially considering some of the recent issues with the campaign, I'd say it's best to steer clear until there is more clarity.
is updown.bt full then or not? he said he was putting a cap on the max number of participants, but who has any idea how many are participating? i suggested to someone that they join, but then realized it wasn't clear.
I have no idea. I have asked them but I haven't received an answer for now. Will try to contact him on Monday/Tuesday. He/them aren't online in the weekend. Well, a lot people got paid and some didn't. It is a bit vague, will add the * again to the campaign.
Yeah, they're really shady bro.
is updown.bt full then or not? he said he was putting a cap on the max number of participants, but who has any idea how many are participating? i suggested to someone that they join, but then realized it wasn't clear.
Some reported that participants only need to make 25 posts a week to get paid in the scratchticket program.
Could you cross-check it with the site owner?
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7179922
This is true, have noticed payments when people did 25 posts. Changed it in OP, thanks for telling that it's incorrect Could you cross-check it with the site owner?
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7179922
You're welcome. Thanks for updating the thread.
Well, a lot people got paid and some didn't. It is a bit vague, will add the * again to the campaign.
even someone open scam accusation about updown.bt here :https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/a-disputes-to-updownbt-solve-642893
i think too risky continue with them from now
Well, a lot people got paid and some didn't. It is a bit vague, will add the * again to the campaign.
Yeah, they're really shady bro.
Some reported that participants only need to make 25 posts a week to get paid in the scratchticket program.
Could you cross-check it with the site owner?
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7179922
This is true, have noticed payments when people did 25 posts. Changed it in OP, thanks for telling that it's incorrect Could you cross-check it with the site owner?
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7179922
Well, a lot people got paid and some didn't. It is a bit vague, will add the * again to the campaign.
Yeah, they're really shady bro.
Well, a lot people got paid and some didn't. It is a bit vague, will add the * again to the campaign.
I'd avoid UpDown.bit. Many people still seem to have not got what they were owed and the new limits now make it less appealing, not to mention you've got to wait a month now wondering what money you're actually going to get at the end of it.
good choice, updown.bt is not professional signature campaign. not recommended!i signed up their campaign two weeks ago, they never confirm nor pay me
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7157442
they just want free advertising from us, who knows next month they'll run away without payment
i wait one week to become full member and join PD again
too bad if we join signature campaign, promoting their site, but owner of campaign doesn't care with us!
Some reported that participants only need to make 25 posts a week to get paid in the scratchticket program.
Could you cross-check it with the site owner?
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7179922
Could you cross-check it with the site owner?
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7179922
global moderator
Activity: 3990
Merit: 2717
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
It doesn't say that you might not get paid anything because the op is too busy to check or confirm people's sign-ups anywhere. I don't think it's harsh at all especially when he seems to respond to next to zero messages or forum queries, but I'm surprised you're making excuses for him. I don't believe he has any intention to scam or not pay people what they are owed or whatever but he really needs to get on top of things because it will damage his company's reputation if he doesn't.
Nah, the most logical explanation is that he didn't calculate what he should be paying people right, but if you're ok with telling yourself it's for bad posts then that's fine for you, but not for everyone else who feels they've been cheated.
Not really to be honest. If he states something in the OP, he can (and most likely will) use it. But that is what I think and I can be wrong of course.And how many posts did you make that wern't 'quality/constructive/on-topic/contributing' exactly?
Around 10 or 15 and I don't mind at all. I can understand it with the thing that I am assuming.And the scam accusation doesn't require his response, but it might force him to stop being incompetent or ignoring people when the reputation of his business is being tarnished by accusations of scams/non-payment.
Well, that is a bit harsh, but I agree with you. global moderator
Activity: 3990
Merit: 2717
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
Well, it's quite clear in the opening post that he doesn't pay for posts that aren't quality/constructive/on-topic/contributing. So yes, I am going to assume that I didn't get paid for certain posts, since it's the most logical assumption.
I can understand why someone would open such a topic, but I doubt he will get a faster answer because of that, haha. If someone is busy, that person is busy. Not much you can do about it.
I can understand why someone would open such a topic, but I doubt he will get a faster answer because of that, haha. If someone is busy, that person is busy. Not much you can do about it.
Nah, the most logical explanation is that he didn't calculate what he should be paying people right, but if you're ok with telling yourself it's for bad posts then that's fine for you, but not for everyone else who feels they've been cheated. And how many posts did you make that wern't 'quality/constructive/on-topic/contributing' exactly?
And the scam accusation doesn't require his response, but it might force him to stop being incompetent or ignoring people when the reputation of his business is being tarnished by accusations of scams/non-payment.
Also, I got paid just fine. Not for all my posts, but that's because he reduces your post count for bad posts.
I think you're just assuming that it's for bad posts or he's just using it as an excuse. I suspect he just didn't add or count the posts properly. He said to one user the posts will be carried over to the next period which he didn't get paid for and they never were. There are still several people from what I can gather who didn't get what they were owed. One user has opened a scam accusation thread because he apparently didn't get anything and not a single message was answerd.
I can understand why someone would open such a topic, but I doubt he will get a faster answer because of that, haha. If someone is busy, that person is busy. Not much you can do about it.
global moderator
Activity: 3990
Merit: 2717
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
Also, I got paid just fine. Not for all my posts, but that's because he reduces your post count for bad posts.
I think you're just assuming that it's for bad posts or he's just using it as an excuse. I suspect he just didn't add or count the posts properly. He said to one user the posts will be carried over to the next period which he didn't get paid for and they never were. There are still several people from what I can gather who didn't get what they were owed. One user has opened a scam accusation thread because he apparently didn't get anything and not a single message was answerd.
Jump to: