Pages:
Author

Topic: Re: yochdog - Bitcoin Mining Company - BTCMC (Read 3616 times)

legendary
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1072
Crypto is the separation of Power and State.
December 03, 2013, 07:28:37 PM
#24
I really hope Yochdog does the right thing and diverts Diablow's fraudulently acquired shares to Satoshi's Forest or some other deserving 3rd party.
full member
Activity: 216
Merit: 100
December 03, 2013, 04:05:56 PM
#23
I look forward to tomorrow, December 4th, the promised date of distribution of of the entire settlement of BitCorp Mining, with great anticipation.
donator
Activity: 3108
Merit: 1166
November 01, 2013, 09:27:34 AM
#22
For the record.

So the total value of BTCMC is stated at 123.56 btc or 0.012356 btc per share, my 500 shares that I paid up to 0.80 btc for, maybe 300 btc odd, now worth the grand total of 6.178 btc to be paid on 2013 12 04 if I agree.

What happens if some of the 751 btc, $152,450 worth atm, that was sent to Bitcoinica gets returned in the future? There is ongoing liquidation I believe & some assets that may be reclaimed, or has that been abandoned?
legendary
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1072
Crypto is the separation of Power and State.
Quote
Let me review this......I would hope Diablo would change his position in light of the substantial dollar payout coming to his holdings

It's too late for me, I sold when he declared DMC null and void.

Later he changed his post to allow for 11-1 AM exchange.  Wish I had kept the original post, maybe thermos can get it.

Regardless, thank you very much for your attention to this distressing matter.

We don't need another Bitcoin scammer laughing all the way to the bank.
legendary
Activity: 2044
Merit: 1000
Let me review this......I would hope Diablo would change his position in light of the substantial dollar payout coming to his holdings. 




An email is going out this afternoon. 

All correspondence will be handled there. 

Hi Yochdog,

On behalf of DMC shareholders who bought shares because of its ostensible exposure to BMC, please allow me to offer you a bribe, charity donation, or otherwise persuade you to NOT give a singe Satoshi to Diablo.

To re-cap:

Back in May, Diablo declared his BMC shares worthless, was humiliated for his scam attempt, and said he would "auction them off."
(https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.2064057)

I offered to buy his BMC for 1 BTC.  Burnside offer to buy his BMC for 2 BTC.  Diablo, caught in a lie, refused both offers.

You confirmed his shares could be sold and transferred en mass.

Diablo never followed up, preferring to wait until a convenient confluence of circumstances allowed him to play the victim and declare DMC shares void.

Diablo knows our massive stake in BMC is worth a lot of BTC.

I don't appreciate being insulted (called a troll for raising my demonstrably valid concerns), lied to, and ripped off.

I know this isn't your problem, and that's why I'm offering you BTC out of my own pocket to make the tiny token effort needed to deny Diablo his ill-gotten gains.

Keep them, donate them, send them to a null address.  I don't care what happens as long as Diablo does not profit from his perfidy.


Cheers,

-iB

Reference:

Ukyo is already aware of my wishes to end DMC. Now that yochdog will allow transference of shares, I am going to consider auctioning them off.

I'm glad you are keeping Ukyo in the loop.  It's not fair that the unwise actions of his asset issuers reflect poorly on his exchange, but yours will regardless.

 Huh  Is Ukyo "already aware" that you unilaterally decided to steal DMC's 1000 BTCMC shares under the false pretext of them holding no value, despite being worth exactly 10% of Yochdog's large established mining company?

I disagree with any attempt by Diablo to assign "zero value" to DMC's holdings.

 Huh  Is Ukyo "already aware" that Yochdog, backed by facts and demonstrative evidence, disagrees with your (former, now abandoned) self-serving subjective appraisal of BTCMC's negligible worth?

 Huh  Is Ukyo "already aware" that you have now contradicted yourself (in a most spectacular and embarrassing manner) by entertaining the idea of holding an auction for shares you previously insisted on declaring defunct, upon suddenly realizing (when pointed out to you) DMC owns an enormous 10% of BTCMC and not the 2% you formerly believed?

 Huh  Is Ukyo "already aware" that many DMC shareholders have already (eagerly) submitted to your abusive, unethical change in DMC's terms, losing their rightful BTCMC stake in the process

 Huh Is Ukyo "already aware" you may now auction off DMC's BTCMC shares, forcing your shareholders to bid for assets they already rightfully own?

Im pretty sure Ukyo is aware that this forum has trolls. You do realize any funds received for the sale of BTCMC would be paid out as dividends, right?

Quote
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.2064866

    
Re: [GLBSE] Bitcorp Mining Company - BTCMC 60+ GH/s, clear ASIC upgrade path.
May 07, 2013, 02:56:24 PM
   
 #204
Quote from: DiabloD3 on May 07, 2013, 02:50:41 PM
Quote from: yochdog on May 07, 2013, 02:41:36 PM
Quote from: DiabloD3 on May 07, 2013, 02:31:38 PM
Quote from: yochdog on May 07, 2013, 02:02:11 PM
Quote from: iCEBREAKER on May 07, 2013, 01:51:52 PM
Quote from: DiabloD3 on May 07, 2013, 01:32:48 PM
Wow, you've dragged your trolling into this thread too?

Why don't you want me to enquire as to Yochdog's opinion of your unflattering characterization of his mining company?

You should welcome his confirmation of the correctness of your negative evaluation of BTCMC.

Yochdog, may I buy DMC's 1000 shares now?  If not, I understand, but will you honor an agreement between Diablo and myself to transfer the shares when possible?

Yes, I will facilitate private transactions of shares between consenting parties. 

Really? So if I go run an auction selling the shares, thats totally fine with you?

You have to sell the entire lot.  I will not break down current holdings into smaller blocks.

If you run an auction, and both parties verify they accept the terms, I will transfer ownership. 

Ahh, that makes it a tad more problematic.

Should be easy!  You have marked the shares to zero on your books, so anything you get out of them is a bonus to your shareholders.  I say full steam ahead. 
legendary
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1072
Crypto is the separation of Power and State.
An email is going out this afternoon. 

All correspondence will be handled there. 

Hi Yochdog,

On behalf of DMC shareholders who bought shares because of its ostensible exposure to BMC, please allow me to offer you a bribe, charity donation, or otherwise persuade you to NOT give a singe Satoshi to Diablo.

To re-cap:

Back in May, Diablo declared his BMC shares worthless, was humiliated for his scam attempt, and said he would "auction them off."
(https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.2064057)

I offered to buy his BMC for 1 BTC.  Burnside offer to buy his BMC for 2 BTC.  Diablo, caught in a lie, refused both offers.

You confirmed his shares could be sold and transferred en mass.

Diablo never followed up, preferring to wait until a convenient confluence of circumstances allowed him to play the victim and declare DMC shares void.

Diablo knows our massive stake in BMC is worth a lot of BTC.

I don't appreciate being insulted (called a troll for raising my demonstrably valid concerns), lied to, and ripped off.

I know this isn't your problem, and that's why I'm offering you BTC out of my own pocket to make the tiny token effort needed to deny Diablo his ill-gotten gains.

Keep them, donate them, send them to a null address.  I don't care what happens as long as Diablo does not profit from his perfidy.


Cheers,

-iB

Reference:

Ukyo is already aware of my wishes to end DMC. Now that yochdog will allow transference of shares, I am going to consider auctioning them off.

I'm glad you are keeping Ukyo in the loop.  It's not fair that the unwise actions of his asset issuers reflect poorly on his exchange, but yours will regardless.

 Huh  Is Ukyo "already aware" that you unilaterally decided to steal DMC's 1000 BTCMC shares under the false pretext of them holding no value, despite being worth exactly 10% of Yochdog's large established mining company?

I disagree with any attempt by Diablo to assign "zero value" to DMC's holdings.

 Huh  Is Ukyo "already aware" that Yochdog, backed by facts and demonstrative evidence, disagrees with your (former, now abandoned) self-serving subjective appraisal of BTCMC's negligible worth?

 Huh  Is Ukyo "already aware" that you have now contradicted yourself (in a most spectacular and embarrassing manner) by entertaining the idea of holding an auction for shares you previously insisted on declaring defunct, upon suddenly realizing (when pointed out to you) DMC owns an enormous 10% of BTCMC and not the 2% you formerly believed?

 Huh  Is Ukyo "already aware" that many DMC shareholders have already (eagerly) submitted to your abusive, unethical change in DMC's terms, losing their rightful BTCMC stake in the process

 Huh Is Ukyo "already aware" you may now auction off DMC's BTCMC shares, forcing your shareholders to bid for assets they already rightfully own?

Im pretty sure Ukyo is aware that this forum has trolls. You do realize any funds received for the sale of BTCMC would be paid out as dividends, right?

Quote
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.2064866

    
Re: [GLBSE] Bitcorp Mining Company - BTCMC 60+ GH/s, clear ASIC upgrade path.
May 07, 2013, 02:56:24 PM
   
 #204
Quote from: DiabloD3 on May 07, 2013, 02:50:41 PM
Quote from: yochdog on May 07, 2013, 02:41:36 PM
Quote from: DiabloD3 on May 07, 2013, 02:31:38 PM
Quote from: yochdog on May 07, 2013, 02:02:11 PM
Quote from: iCEBREAKER on May 07, 2013, 01:51:52 PM
Quote from: DiabloD3 on May 07, 2013, 01:32:48 PM
Wow, you've dragged your trolling into this thread too?

Why don't you want me to enquire as to Yochdog's opinion of your unflattering characterization of his mining company?

You should welcome his confirmation of the correctness of your negative evaluation of BTCMC.

Yochdog, may I buy DMC's 1000 shares now?  If not, I understand, but will you honor an agreement between Diablo and myself to transfer the shares when possible?

Yes, I will facilitate private transactions of shares between consenting parties. 

Really? So if I go run an auction selling the shares, thats totally fine with you?

You have to sell the entire lot.  I will not break down current holdings into smaller blocks.

If you run an auction, and both parties verify they accept the terms, I will transfer ownership. 

Ahh, that makes it a tad more problematic.

Should be easy!  You have marked the shares to zero on your books, so anything you get out of them is a bonus to your shareholders.  I say full steam ahead. 
legendary
Activity: 2044
Merit: 1000
An email is going out this afternoon. 

All correspondence will be handled there. 
full member
Activity: 216
Merit: 100
Quote from: iCEBREAKER on July 27, 2013, 02:52:23 PM
hi YD,

Thx for update.  What is the July 7 BLF payday?

Have you tried scrypt mining at multipool.in or middlecoin?

once you have inventory done maybe Diablo will finally auction our stake, which could help you find the right price for the rest.

For the ASICS I lined up for BTCMC, the paydate is July 7th.

Until they start shipping that pay-date, we are stuck in the mud.


You must have received the ascics from BFL by now. How about anj update on what is going on with our investment?

3 BFL singles were received and have been mining away.

The remaining equipment is about 70% liquidated, the remaining is in process. 

I expect to make a liquidation payment on everything but the BFL equipment in October. 


Since it is now the last day of October, would you please respect your shareholders/partners with an update?
full member
Activity: 216
Merit: 100
September 25, 2013, 07:17:42 PM
#16
You must have received the ascics from BFL by now. How about anj update on what is going on with our investment?
[/quote]

3 BFL singles were received and have been mining away.

The remaining equipment is about 70% liquidated, the remaining is in process. 

I expect to make a liquidation payment on everything but the BFL equipment in October. 


[/quote]

Thankyou for the update. Can we reasonably expect that there will soon be dividends from the "3 BFL singles that have been mining away"?
legendary
Activity: 2044
Merit: 1000
September 25, 2013, 09:11:46 AM
#15
Quote from: iCEBREAKER on July 27, 2013, 02:52:23 PM
hi YD,

Thx for update.  What is the July 7 BLF payday?

Have you tried scrypt mining at multipool.in or middlecoin?

once you have inventory done maybe Diablo will finally auction our stake, which could help you find the right price for the rest.

For the ASICS I lined up for BTCMC, the paydate is July 7th.

Until they start shipping that pay-date, we are stuck in the mud.


You must have received the ascics from BFL by now. How about anj update on what is going on with our investment?

3 BFL singles were received and have been mining away.

The remaining equipment is about 70% liquidated, the remaining is in process. 

I expect to make a liquidation payment on everything but the BFL equipment in October. 

donator
Activity: 3108
Merit: 1166
September 25, 2013, 04:34:19 AM
#14
...

PLEASE, please distribute the btc from the mining operations up until the time it became unprofitable, meagre as that may be, to we the shareholders. If it is no longer being used to maximize shareholder profit, or for continuing operations, why not distribute it to the shareholders so that they can put it their own uses? Why must we wait months for the liquidation of every last asset before you can distribute btc on hand?

I don't think that is a bad suggestion at all.  Maybe even 60% of what I think the total amount will be, then settle the final balance once everything is sold off. 

Do any other shareholders have an opinion on this?

I believe it to be trying to make the best of a bad situation.

If the operation is being wound up & all assets sold, then there is no further need to hold back any funds at all from being sent to the investors, be these previous mining profits, money gained from the sale of the mining equipment or refunds from cancelled ASIC orders, it would show good faith to pay out all these funds in hand to investors now & provide an inventory of what the company's assets still are with an estimate of when they are likely to be sold & what they are likely to realize. I assume that some mining has still being going on these last months, for btc &/or for alts, with the old equipment & at least some ASICS, so the info on that would be welcome as well.
full member
Activity: 216
Merit: 100
September 24, 2013, 09:23:11 PM
#13
Quote from: iCEBREAKER on July 27, 2013, 02:52:23 PM
hi YD,

Thx for update.  What is the July 7 BLF payday?

Have you tried scrypt mining at multipool.in or middlecoin?

once you have inventory done maybe Diablo will finally auction our stake, which could help you find the right price for the rest.

For the ASICS I lined up for BTCMC, the paydate is July 7th.

Until they start shipping that pay-date, we are stuck in the mud.


You must have received the ascics from BFL by now. How about anj update on what is going on with our investment?
full member
Activity: 216
Merit: 100
September 14, 2013, 04:03:37 PM
#12
So expected to be wound up "in the next month or two" & reg it is 751 BTC that went to Bitcoinica.

I only heard a rumor that it was 80 btc but I am astonished so much was tied up there. so the 751 if recovered would give us some roi. If anyone involved in the bitcoinica legal battle with mtgox could give us an idea of the realistic prospect for recovery -that would be helpfull

The amount was disclosed months ago on the original thread. 

It completely sucks, and is the only reason the company is not profitable at this point (in $ terms) 

Mt Gox is our enemy.  They refuse to help the liquidators in any fashion, and obstruct all attempts at recovery.  Mark Kerpeles is a piece of shit who wants to confiscate the thousands of BTC for his own greedy desires. 

Apparently Mt Gox had $5 million seized by US regulators and may be in no position to facilitate bitcoinica liquidators.

PLEASE, please distribute the btc from the mining operations up until the time it became unprofitable, meagre as that may be, to we the shareholders. If it is no longer being used to maximize shareholder profit, or for continuing operations, why not distribute it to the shareholders so that they can put it their own uses? Why must we wait months for the liquidation of every last asset before you can distribute btc on hand?

I don't think that is a bad suggestion at all.  Maybe even 60% of what I think the total amount will be, then settle the final balance once everything is sold off. 

Do any other shareholders have an opinion on this?

I believe it to be trying to make the best of a bad situation.
legendary
Activity: 2044
Merit: 1000
September 13, 2013, 01:25:45 PM
#11
So expected to be wound up "in the next month or two" & reg it is 751 BTC that went to Bitcoinica.

I only heard a rumor that it was 80 btc but I am astonished so much was tied up there. so the 751 if recovered would give us some roi. If anyone involved in the bitcoinica legal battle with mtgox could give us an idea of the realistic prospect for recovery -that would be helpfull

The amount was disclosed months ago on the original thread. 

It completely sucks, and is the only reason the company is not profitable at this point (in $ terms) 

Mt Gox is our enemy.  They refuse to help the liquidators in any fashion, and obstruct all attempts at recovery.  Mark Kerpeles is a piece of shit who wants to confiscate the thousands of BTC for his own greedy desires. 

Apparently Mt Gox had $5 million seized by US regulators and may be in no position to facilitate bitcoinica liquidators.

PLEASE, please distribute the btc from the mining operations up until the time it became unprofitable, meagre as that may be, to we the shareholders. If it is no longer being used to maximize shareholder profit, or for continuing operations, why not distribute it to the shareholders so that they can put it their own uses? Why must we wait months for the liquidation of every last asset before you can distribute btc on hand?

I don't think that is a bad suggestion at all.  Maybe even 60% of what I think the total amount will be, then settle the final balance once everything is sold off. 
full member
Activity: 216
Merit: 100
September 13, 2013, 01:16:19 PM
#10
So expected to be wound up "in the next month or two" & reg it is 751 BTC that went to Bitcoinica.

I only heard a rumor that it was 80 btc but I am astonished so much was tied up there. so the 751 if recovered would give us some roi. If anyone involved in the bitcoinica legal battle with mtgox could give us an idea of the realistic prospect for recovery -that would be helpfull

The amount was disclosed months ago on the original thread. 

It completely sucks, and is the only reason the company is not profitable at this point (in $ terms) 

Mt Gox is our enemy.  They refuse to help the liquidators in any fashion, and obstruct all attempts at recovery.  Mark Kerpeles is a piece of shit who wants to confiscate the thousands of BTC for his own greedy desires. 

Apparently Mt Gox had $5 million seized by US regulators and may be in no position to facilitate bitcoinica liquidators.

PLEASE, please distribute the btc from the mining operations up until the time it became unprofitable, meagre as that may be, to we the shareholders. If it is no longer being used to maximize shareholder profit, or for continuing operations, why not distribute it to the shareholders so that they can put it their own uses? Why must we wait months for the liquidation of every last asset before you can distribute btc on hand?
legendary
Activity: 2044
Merit: 1000
September 13, 2013, 10:15:44 AM
#9
So expected to be wound up "in the next month or two" & reg it is 751 BTC that went to Bitcoinica.

I only heard a rumor that it was 80 btc but I am astonished so much was tied up there. so the 751 if recovered would give us some roi. If anyone involved in the bitcoinica legal battle with mtgox could give us an idea of the realistic prospect for recovery -that would be helpfull

The amount was disclosed months ago on the original thread. 

It completely sucks, and is the only reason the company is not profitable at this point (in $ terms) 

Mt Gox is our enemy.  They refuse to help the liquidators in any fashion, and obstruct all attempts at recovery.  Mark Kerpeles is a piece of shit who wants to confiscate the thousands of BTC for his own greedy desires. 
reg
sr. member
Activity: 463
Merit: 250
September 13, 2013, 10:11:32 AM
#8
So expected to be wound up "in the next month or two" & reg it is 751 BTC that went to Bitcoinica.

I only heard a rumor that it was 80 btc but I am astonished so much was tied up there. so the 751 if recovered would give us some roi. If anyone involved in the bitcoinica legal battle with mtgox could give us an idea of the realistic prospect for recovery -that would be helpfull
legendary
Activity: 2044
Merit: 1000
September 13, 2013, 09:54:01 AM
#7
So expected to be wound up "in the next month or two" & reg it is 751 BTC that went to Bitcoinica.

There is a lot of random equipment that takes time to sell (ie, PSUs, Mobos, Ram, HD, Cases, cables, etc)  I am sure you all know how much goes into mining!
donator
Activity: 3108
Merit: 1166
September 13, 2013, 09:52:38 AM
#6
So expected to be wound up "in the next month or two" & reg it is 751 BTC that went to Bitcoinica.
legendary
Activity: 2044
Merit: 1000
September 13, 2013, 09:43:08 AM
#5
Hey guys.

An e-mail has been sent to all partners at their registered e-mail address. 
Pages:
Jump to: