Pages:
Author

Topic: Reasonable Prize - page 2. (Read 1039 times)

legendary
Activity: 3444
Merit: 3469
Crypto Swap Exchange
November 25, 2015, 06:44:05 AM
#11
i think that faucet with 10-20 min. is are not sustainable on long term. also 700-1000 satoshi is minimum for decent rewards
hero member
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
November 25, 2015, 06:41:33 AM
#10
Well to satisfy all the users maybe having 2 or 3 reward system could be a great idea, for example users can choose between 750 satoshi every hour or 1500-2000 sat every 5-6 hours or 3500 every day of course if you claimed on one you cannot use the others. I remember i saw something like this on a scammy faucet but it was a good idea imo.

Personally I prefer faucets with timer like moonbitcoin, you are free how much you claim and they have nice rewards.

Yes, that would be nice, a great idea
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 500
November 25, 2015, 06:40:22 AM
#9
The reward must be something that faucet is generating daily ,otherwise makes no sense have a faucet to pay more then you are earning soo be a 500 or 1000satoshis hour will only atract more or less users but its better to runs with susntentable income vs reward.
legendary
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1065
✋(▀Ĺ̯ ▀-͠ )
November 25, 2015, 05:43:29 AM
#8
Well to satisfy all the users maybe having 2 or 3 reward system could be a great idea, for example users can choose between 750 satoshi every hour or 1500-2000 sat every 5-6 hours or 3500 every day of course if you claimed on one you cannot use the others. I remember i saw something like this on a scammy faucet but it was a good idea imo.

Personally I prefer faucets with timer like moonbitcoin, you are free how much you claim and they have nice rewards.
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
1BkEzspSxp2zzHiZTtUZJ6TjEb1hERFdRr
November 25, 2015, 05:22:48 AM
#7
In my opinion, best faucet should have prize in range 500-10000 satoshies with average around 700-1000 sats. PPL like to have chance of getting bigger prize.
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1000
November 25, 2015, 05:19:43 AM
#6
For me the reasonable claim depend of how many captcha code i get insert for have.
If site pay 1000 satoshi for hour, for me is good, but if pay 200 satoshi every 10 minutes (and i get add 6 time a captcha code) is a losed time.
hero member
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
November 25, 2015, 04:45:13 AM
#5
I would think 500-1000sat/hr, or you can transpone this to 1000-2000/2hr,  2000-4000/4hr and so on but there must be a relation with your ad income, that's the most important criterium.
sr. member
Activity: 274
Merit: 250
Negative rating was requested by me (SFR10)
November 25, 2015, 12:59:06 AM
#4
Most users (myself) prefer it to be in the range of 1000 per hour but due to the recent price increase of Bitcoin then I think you could lower it a bit or rather make it to have multiple reward like 500 (60%) 750 (25%)
1000 (15%) for each hour or even better, make everything triple, the time interval and rewards so they will still have a good rewards and less need of claiming.
hero member
Activity: 1036
Merit: 501
November 24, 2015, 09:37:36 PM
#3
I personally think 1000 satoshi is the minimum amount to be attractive for people. Today there are already so many faucets available...good luck with it.
full member
Activity: 147
Merit: 100
November 24, 2015, 09:19:44 PM
#2
Everyone will be different. I'd think 500/hr. Others will think higher reward per longer wait.

Depends. Some like to visit more often.
newbie
Activity: 45
Merit: 0
November 24, 2015, 06:46:01 PM
#1
Hello fellow members!

I wasn't sure of which category to post this question to. Anyway I've been searching the net, specifically different bitcoin faucets to do some reasearch on prize setting and I was a little confused because of course there is a huge variety in prizes in different faucets. Some pay 200-1500 satohi per hour, others pay 2240 satoshi per 6 hour etc. What would be the ideal prize to set for a faucet? Of course, the higher the better but suitability is a huge factor in this. What would be the ideal prize range to put on a faucet with suitability in consideration? And also attractive to users!
Pages:
Jump to: