. The bottom line, KYC is unnecessary. 
Topic: Reasons Crypto Players Skip Casinos with KYC - page 8. (Read 3407 times)
If I will be asked also, I will definitely disagree to KYC because I hate the feeling of being intimidated. The feeling that someone out there knew that you got lots of money after playing casino and could possibly become a threat in your life assuming that he got bad intentions (who knows?). I think another reason why it seems everyone hate KYC is because casinos before was able to run even without this stuff and got no problems at all then what would be the difference of including it now? Is it really big? I don't think so, actually i see that disadvantages weigh more than its benefits . The bottom line, KYC is unnecessary.
. The bottom line, KYC is unnecessary. 
Beyond the reasons mentioned in the Op I find a much important factor that keeps gamblers skip the KYC process is the fear of governments. Someday if governments request to submit the data of each and every user, our information gets revealed with the
amount wagered in total. Some foolish governments might also levy tax taking it as a proof of spending though most games lost.
It's not really about the gov't but it's simply because we don't want to be exposed and we don't want the casino itself to know who we are.amount wagered in total. Some foolish governments might also levy tax taking it as a proof of spending though most games lost.
The reason why we used crypto to gamble is because there's no need for certain documents to verify in able to gamble.
Frankly, there are reasons why we don't want to reveal our data to others, and government could be one of the reasons. I myself, only submit KYC whenever there is no other way but submitting it and it should be outside gambling business, like what I've done in my local exchange. Btw, in gambling, instead of submitting my data, it would be better to leave gambling completely.
Beyond the reasons mentioned in the Op I find a much important factor that keeps gamblers skip the KYC process is the fear of governments. Someday if governments request to submit the data of each and every user, our information gets revealed with the
amount wagered in total. Some foolish governments might also levy tax taking it as a proof of spending though most games lost.
It's not really about the gov't but it's simply because we don't want to be exposed and we don't want the casino itself to know who we are.amount wagered in total. Some foolish governments might also levy tax taking it as a proof of spending though most games lost.
The reason why we used crypto to gamble is because there's no need for certain documents to verify in able to gamble.
While I agree that requiring KYC from Casino players are well-intentioned, I also agree that it is indeed a hassle and a risk at the same time. Why would I have to go through such all these long processes if there are options out there that won't require any of these? And do we have a 100% assurance that the personal data taken from us are kept safe? A little leak could easily expose our personal information for illegal exploitation.
Beyond the reasons mentioned in the Op I find a much important factor that keeps gamblers skip the KYC process is the fear of governments. Someday if governments request to submit the data of each and every user, our information gets revealed with the
amount wagered in total. Some foolish governments might also levy tax taking it as a proof of spending though most games lost.
amount wagered in total. Some foolish governments might also levy tax taking it as a proof of spending though most games lost.
Right! And with government's interference, there will be tax imposed upon the operator. The more tax is imposed, the more charges there will be on the players' transactions with the casino.
Beyond the reasons mentioned in the Op I find a much important factor that keeps gamblers skip the KYC process is the fear of governments. Someday if governments request to submit the data of each and every user, our information gets revealed with the
amount wagered in total. Some foolish governments might also levy tax taking it as a proof of spending though most games lost.
amount wagered in total. Some foolish governments might also levy tax taking it as a proof of spending though most games lost.
It is definitely a big hassle for every gambler and it takes time to do KYC. But then, isn't an urge for us to do KYC if we don't like or have to skip it and find other gambling sites. The stand of being anonymous of all individual will be our concern but somehow we need to follow their rules, otherwise, we can't enjoy their site.
I don't really see the essence of doing KYC for online Casinos. The infographic here is concise and cool, stating some obvious facts why personally I don't like the idea of KYC by some gambling sites. KYC complicates the whole idea of using crypto for online casinos.
I think KYC makes people need to verify their identity. Meanwhile, the website does not prove to their customer about who they are, where they operate the site, and I think they do not become transparent to its customer. They have their customer data's, but the customer doesn't have their data's, but we cannot do anything. Fortunately, we have so many gambling websites which don't use KYC to their customer so we can join with them, and many of them are trusted gambling website.
Well right, that is very unfair. Such gambling sites are bad sites. And it sounds a little funny too if gambling sites have to do kyc, especially the developers are not transparent to users. If I meet a site like this, I will definitely say that the site is a prospective scammer.
I don't really see the essence of doing KYC for online Casinos. The infographic here is concise and cool, stating some obvious facts why personally I don't like the idea of KYC by some gambling sites. KYC complicates the whole idea of using crypto for online casinos.
I think KYC makes people need to verify their identity. Meanwhile, the website does not prove to their customer about who they are, where they operate the site, and I think they do not become transparent to its customer. They have their customer data's, but the customer doesn't have their data's, but we cannot do anything. Fortunately, we have so many gambling websites which don't use KYC to their customer so we can join with them, and many of them are trusted gambling website.
Well right, that is very unfair. Such gambling sites are bad sites. And it sounds a little funny too if gambling sites have to do kyc, especially the developers are not transparent to users. If I meet a site like this, I will definitely say that the site is a prospective scammer.
I don't really see the essence of doing KYC for online Casinos. The infographic here is concise and cool, stating some obvious facts why personally I don't like the idea of KYC by some gambling sites. KYC complicates the whole idea of using crypto for online casinos.
I think KYC makes people need to verify their identity. Meanwhile, the website does not prove to their customer about who they are, where they operate the site, and I think they do not become transparent to its customer. They have their customer data's, but the customer doesn't have their data's, but we cannot do anything. Fortunately, we have so many gambling websites which don't use KYC to their customer so we can join with them, and many of them are trusted gambling website.
I don't really see the essence of doing KYC for online Casinos. The infographic here is concise and cool, stating some obvious facts why personally I don't like the idea of KYC by some gambling sites. KYC complicates the whole idea of using crypto for online casinos.
But we as users cannot also forbid the owner of the gambling website from doing that because basically KYC is to show the legality of the user.
and also prevent future problems such as the financial and security of the account itself. and also not all online casino with crypto requires KYC to start play or anything like that. with certain restrictions. for me as long they dont ask credit card im still safe.
I don't really see the essence of doing KYC for online Casinos. The infographic here is concise and cool, stating some obvious facts why personally I don't like the idea of KYC by some gambling sites. KYC complicates the whole idea of using crypto for online casinos.
But we as users cannot also forbid the owner of the gambling website from doing that because basically KYC is to show the legality of the user.
and also prevent future problems such as the financial and security of the account itself. and also not all online casino with crypto requires KYC to start play or anything like that. with certain restrictions. for me as long they dont ask credit card im still safe.
Tell me please, what do you think are the safe moments behind the condition to provide KYC? In most cases, many users provide their passport data on exchanges, on social networks, and why this causes resentment when it comes to online casinos.
If it's for the exchange, it doesn't seem to be a problem. Because we usually give it to trade there and make big withdrawals. If not, of course there is no need to do KYC as well as exchange. And for social media, it seems that it has never done KYC and indeed there has never been a social media that is obliged to do KYC for each of its users. And for casinos, it would be very objectionable if you have to do it, because many people who want to play gambling are just for fun and want to keep their identity a secret.
Tell me please, what do you think are the safe moments behind the condition to provide KYC? In most cases, many users provide their passport data on exchanges, on social networks, and why this causes resentment when it comes to online casinos.
Of all the reasons mentioned on the first page of course it is all very true. What I want to emphasize again is that every player including me personally wants to play gambling without many people knowing it or can be said to be anonymous. That's the reason I want to emphasize why I don't want to do Kyc.
It is the most important and will always be considered, after all not all countries legalize gambling and some gamblers are in countries that prohibit gambling. In this case they are looking for other alternatives to gamble by playing at online gambling which of course will skip KYC.People do not want to land in trouble by giving KYC and also if the casinos is newly opened or does not have that much trust then it can be another issue because not sure how your KYC details could be mis-utilized and
I don't really see the essence of doing KYC for online Casinos. The infographic here is concise and cool, stating some obvious facts why personally I don't like the idea of KYC by some gambling sites. KYC complicates the whole idea of using crypto for online casinos.
Of all the reasons mentioned on the first page of course it is all very true. What I want to emphasize again is that every player including me personally wants to play gambling without many people knowing it or can be said to be anonymous. That's the reason I want to emphasize why I don't want to do Kyc.
It is the most important and will always be considered, after all not all countries legalize gambling and some gamblers are in countries that prohibit gambling. In this case they are looking for other alternatives to gamble by playing at online gambling which of course will skip KYC.People do not want to land in trouble by giving KYC and also if the casinos is newly opened or does not have that much trust then it can be another issue because not sure how your KYC details could be mis-utilized and
Of all the reasons mentioned on the first page of course it is all very true. What I want to emphasize again is that every player including me personally wants to play gambling without many people knowing it or can be said to be anonymous. That's the reason I want to emphasize why I don't want to do Kyc.
It is the most important and will always be considered, after all not all countries legalize gambling and some gamblers are in countries that prohibit gambling. In this case they are looking for other alternatives to gamble by playing at online gambling which of course will skip KYC.Well indeed, not all countries legalize gambling, even in my country, gambling is illegal. Those who are known to play gambling, they will be ostracized in their territory. Therefore gambling is really needed for the level of anonymity.
And sure enough, I don't think there is any point in any gambling platform making KYC rules to its users. Because gambling itself is a betting game, this is not a business and rarely is the government legalizing.
Of all the reasons mentioned on the first page of course it is all very true. What I want to emphasize again is that every player including me personally wants to play gambling without many people knowing it or can be said to be anonymous. That's the reason I want to emphasize why I don't want to do Kyc.
It is the most important and will always be considered, after all not all countries legalize gambling and some gamblers are in countries that prohibit gambling. In this case they are looking for other alternatives to gamble by playing at online gambling which of course will skip KYC. 
Of all the reasons mentioned on the first page of course it is all very true. What I want to emphasize again is that every player including me personally wants to play gambling without many people knowing it or can be said to be anonymous. That's the reason I want to emphasize why I don't want to do Kyc.
Again you are thinking for your own perspective. We have a multitude of people who come to gamble at popular casinos. This ranges from average earners to criminals who want to use the site wallet as a intermediary wallet for their illegal transactions. This is also the reason why mixers and tumbler services are so rampant. They want to evade detection and thus attempt to bounce the transaction between these sites, play a bit there on low risk multipliers and then then withdraw it so they dont get detected. Such cases are common and they need to be KYCed to be caught.
Jump to: