I will believe Quickseller over Bitcoin SV on his claim. However, I asked him to report the message to mod/admin to prove the legitimacy.
I seriously doubt QS sent BSV an unsolicited PM trying to extort bitcoin from him, especially since QS started this thread first, and BSV started what looks to be a revenge thread. Given how BSV has acted previously, I'm 99.99% confident in my assessment here--but hey, if the mods care to step in and verify the facts, I'm all for that.They should just launch a signature campaign and ask their participants to merit their posts - that's easy enough and obviously working and business as usual for some... 
Hopefully that's sarcasm, but it's hard to tell on the interwebz. I also hope you're not referring to Chipmixer or Foxpup's avatar thing, because nobody's asking anybody to send merits to fellow campaign participants in either one. Just sayin'.Sorry for late response - hum, not sure I'd call it sarcasm - there are campaigns where participants merit each other's posts or to be exact, merit their client's posts no matter what - funnily, even when posts are written in a language they don't even understand. So what's the stand when it comes to something like this here in the forum? I see people complaining about other's doing merit giveaways etc. but this is fine? Couldn't care less but the double standards (forum ethics/moral) are pretty annoying.
And no, I wasn't referring to Chipmixer or Foxpup cycling crew.
