sperg
Can you fuck off? 
Topic: Recommended bitcointalk escrow services - page 10. (Read 37034 times)
Not sure John K is really active enough to add to this list. I know he used to be the go to guy for escrows a few years back, but I never see him these days. The rest of the list looks good to me though.
Hi Blazed I sent John a message asking if his details were correct and he replied saying they were so assumed he was okay to be on the list
. 
I would remove Lauda and minerjones from this list. They were both escrow for a deal that went bad, in which funds were lost, and lauda had announced the escrow agents were going to impose the losses on those they were supposed to be protecting against losses -- this very much defeats the point of using escrow.
You fail to mention the part where Lauda and minerjones, with the help of Gleb and maybe others recovered all funds and paid it back to the investors Here. AFAIK they even waived their fees even after all the extra work that got added. So please, stop spreading that about some of the most honest/professional escrows out there.
Also, they did charge a fee, see this transaction, each of them "earned" around $215.
I am curious to know if anyone would be willing to use a particular escrow service if they knew there is a possibility a scammer would run away with funds, and the escrow agent would not cover losses when they failed to properly secure the money.
did anyone order a cunt?? cos one keeps on coming in and posting in this thread...
utilizing multisig does help prevent scams.. maybe that is why OG refuses to use it?? are you saying that your favorite escrow is more likely to scam than someone using multi sig??
wow.. turning on your lover OG??
I am curious to know if anyone would be willing to use a particular escrow service if they knew there is a possibility a scammer would run away with funds
There is always a fair possibility that the escrow will attempt to fuck over their customers for personal gain, as shown by yourself and Master-P. I would hope that anyone using an escrow acknowledges this. 
Lauda and minerjones (along with yahoonumbers) screwed up, and said they were going to impose losses as a result.
Nope.The whole point of using escrow is to not allow losses resulting from someone absconding with funds.
You can't protect what you don't hold. That was made clear. Your illiteracy sure ain't my problem. Go away already, butthurt scammer; you *covered* enough by shamelessly scamming dozens of people. I do wonder why *certain individuals* didn't tag you.
I would remove Lauda and minerjones from this list. They were both escrow for a deal that went bad, in which funds were lost, and lauda had announced the escrow agents were going to impose the losses on those they were supposed to be protecting against losses -- this very much defeats the point of using escrow.
You fail to mention the part where Lauda and minerjones, with the help of Gleb and maybe others recovered all funds and paid it back to the investors Here. AFAIK they even waived their fees even after all the extra work that got added. So please, stop spreading that about some of the most honest/professional escrows out there.
Also, they did charge a fee, see this transaction, each of them "earned" around $215.
I am curious to know if anyone would be willing to use a particular escrow service if they knew there is a possibility a scammer would run away with funds, and the escrow agent would not cover losses when they failed to properly secure the money.
In my time I have used nearly all of that list as escrows / or have traded with them and trust them
OgNasty
SebastianJu
minerjones
John K.
Lauda
Mitchell
Zepher
Lutpin
Thats not to say I dont trust the few I havent listed, just that I havent had dealings with them (yet
)
OgNasty
SebastianJu
minerjones
John K.
Lauda
Mitchell
Zepher
Lutpin
Thats not to say I dont trust the few I havent listed, just that I havent had dealings with them (yet
) 
I would remove Lauda and minerjones from this list. They were both escrow for a deal that went bad, in which funds were lost, and lauda had announced the escrow agents were going to impose the losses on those they were supposed to be protecting against losses -- this very much defeats the point of using escrow.
You fail to mention the part where Lauda and minerjones, with the help of Gleb and maybe others recovered all funds and paid it back to the investors Here. AFAIK they even waived their fees even after all the extra work that got added. So please, stop spreading that about some of the most honest/professional escrows out there.
I had a feeling they'd deliver - well done people!
I would remove Lauda and minerjones from this list. They were both escrow for a deal that went bad, in which funds were lost, and lauda had announced the escrow agents were going to impose the losses on those they were supposed to be protecting against losses -- this very much defeats the point of using escrow.
Escrow scammer making recommendations for a list of escrow services, and lying while at it? Just pathetic. 
I would remove Lauda and minerjones from this list. They were both escrow for a deal that went bad, in which funds were lost, and lauda had announced the escrow agents were going to impose the losses on those they were supposed to be protecting against losses -- this very much defeats the point of using escrow.
You fail to mention the part where Lauda and minerjones, with the help of Gleb and maybe others recovered all funds and paid it back to the investors Here. AFAIK they even waived their fees even after all the extra work that got added. So please, stop spreading that about some of the most honest/professional escrows out there.
I would remove Lauda and minerjones from this list. They were both escrow for a deal that went bad, in which funds were lost, and lauda had announced the escrow agents were going to impose the losses on those they were supposed to be protecting against losses -- this very much defeats the point of using escrow.
You fail to mention the part where Lauda and minerjones, with the help of Gleb and maybe others recovered all funds and paid it back to the investors Here. AFAIK they even waived their fees even after all the extra work that got added. So please, stop spreading that about some of the most honest/professional escrows out there.
BURN!!!!!
I would remove Lauda and minerjones from this list. They were both escrow for a deal that went bad, in which funds were lost, and lauda had announced the escrow agents were going to impose the losses on those they were supposed to be protecting against losses -- this very much defeats the point of using escrow.
You fail to mention the part where Lauda and minerjones, with the help of Gleb and maybe others recovered all funds and paid it back to the investors Here. AFAIK they even waived their fees even after all the extra work that got added. So please, stop spreading that about some of the most honest/professional escrows out there.
I would remove Lauda and minerjones from this list. They were both escrow for a deal that went bad, in which funds were lost, and lauda had announced the escrow agents were going to impose the losses on those they were supposed to be protecting against losses -- this very much defeats the point of using escrow.
dont listen to this scumbag....
my thoughts is anyone who doesnt offer multi sig should be removed.. as they are dinosaurs in the new age..
I would remove Lauda and minerjones from this list. They were both escrow for a deal that went bad, in which funds were lost, and lauda had announced the escrow agents were going to impose the losses on those they were supposed to be protecting against losses -- this very much defeats the point of using escrow.
Slightly off topic, I was going to suggest this thread be listed on the [Overview] The one thread to link them all https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/overview-the-one-thread-to-link-them-all-1217042 thread, but I see shorena has both locked the thread and has been offline for six weeks.
Does anyone know if they will be back soon? Should an interim new "One Thread to link them all" style thread be started for changing threads?
Does anyone know if they will be back soon? Should an interim new "One Thread to link them all" style thread be started for changing threads?
Not sure John K is really active enough to add to this list. I know he used to be the go to guy for escrows a few years back, but I never see him these days. The rest of the list looks good to me though.
Good. I was looking for this service to pay service providers in a safe manner.
Thanks for the post - am replying to enable me to follow the thread.
No problem
Thanks for the post - am replying to enable me to follow the thread.
Can I be added to the escrow list?
Official Thread: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ethereum-escrow-service-by-trusted-sr-member-53455-ether-escrowed-2221107
Fee: 1.25%
Cryptocurrencies: Ether
Location: Asia
Escrow history: 4 transactions, 2.83 Eth in total.
I secure escrow transactions using the Dapp EscrowMyEther, using Ether as currency. The ethereum smart contract securely hold buyer's funds while in escrow. Escrow agents only have the ability to refund the buyer or release funds to seller. They can never access the funds for an extra layer of security.
By using the Dapp, buyers can initiate the escrow transaction and sellers can view incoming transactions on dashboard immediately without several messages with the escrow, saving both parties time. (especially for small amounts) Buyers can also release funds themselves in the Dapp.
Some pictures of the Dapp
[Initiate escrow transaction]
[Buyer release funds]
[Withdrawing funds]
Official Thread: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ethereum-escrow-service-by-trusted-sr-member-53455-ether-escrowed-2221107
Fee: 1.25%
Cryptocurrencies: Ether
Location: Asia
Escrow history: 4 transactions, 2.83 Eth in total.
I secure escrow transactions using the Dapp EscrowMyEther, using Ether as currency. The ethereum smart contract securely hold buyer's funds while in escrow. Escrow agents only have the ability to refund the buyer or release funds to seller. They can never access the funds for an extra layer of security.
By using the Dapp, buyers can initiate the escrow transaction and sellers can view incoming transactions on dashboard immediately without several messages with the escrow, saving both parties time. (especially for small amounts) Buyers can also release funds themselves in the Dapp.
Some pictures of the Dapp
[Initiate escrow transaction]
[Buyer release funds]
[Withdrawing funds]
No sorry this list is for trusted bitcointalk escrows with previous trade experience.
Jump to: