January 10, 2025, 06:40:37 PM

Welcome, Guest

News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]

Bitcoin Forum>Economy>Trading Discussion>Reputation

Pages:

Author

Topic: Record of our deleted posts - permitted flow preventing relevant information - page 2. (Read 970 times)

The-One-Above-All

member

Activity: 252

Merit: 56

Quote from: TheNewAnon135246 on May 22, 2019, 07:42:48 AM

Quote from: The-One-Above-All on May 22, 2019, 07:38:21 AM

Delete 7

I have a relaxing week off to enjoy myself and come back to more disgusting shady and devious moderation

Quote from: Bitcoin Forum

A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. Posts are most frequently deleted because they are off-topic, though they can also be deleted for other reasons. In the future, please avoid posting things that need to be deleted.

Quote

We should not be trying to leverage this just to get our own red removed.

We need to think of the best interests of the entire board. There can be no valid reason to remove red from persons that have such a trail of observable financially motivated dangerous and scamming behaviors on this board.

Explanation required or again I call these mods out for being super shady here. Trying to weaponize this "deleted posts" metric to get excellent, honest and and truthful members banned. Also hiding truths their pals want to remain hidden.

1. how was it off topic?
2. how was it irrelevant ?

which mod deleted it ? from my own thread? examining OGnastys motivation for the removal of legitimate scam tags from an observable liar and scammer like lauda

What kind of board is this where you get a scam tag for presenting observable instances of lying and scamming by those voting themselves into DT and excluding any other persons that dare to call them out for the untrustworthy scum they have demonstrated themselves to be.

This is becoming one of the most horrendous environments of any forum out there.

Nobody is forcing you to stay.

Also, you should include a link to each topic when complaining about a deleted post (for reference).

Wait until this post is about to drop off page 1 before bumping it in future.

Everyone honest person is forcing me to stay. You mean nobody from your fortune jack sig spamming dirt bag club wants me to stay.

The email contained no link. This seems like an issue with the forum software. It should give the mods name, the mods reason for deleting and the link. Take it up with theymos.

TheNewAnon135246

legendary

Activity: 2198

Merit: 1989

฿uy ฿itcoin

Quote from: The-One-Above-All on May 22, 2019, 07:38:21 AM

Delete 7

I have a relaxing week off to enjoy myself and come back to more disgusting shady and devious moderation

Quote from: Bitcoin Forum

Quote

Nobody is forcing you to stay.

Also, you should include a link to each topic when complaining about a deleted post (for reference).

The-One-Above-All

member

Activity: 252

Merit: 56

Delete 7

I have a relaxing week off to enjoy myself and come back to more disgusting shady and devious moderation

Quote from: Bitcoin Forum

Quote

Explanation required or again I call these mods out for being super shady here. Trying to weaponize this "deleted posts" metric to get excellent, honest and and truthful members banned. Also hiding truths their pals want to remain hidden.

1. how was it off topic?
2. how was it irrelevant ?

which mod deleted it ? from my own thread? examining OGnastys motivation for the removal of legitimate scam tags from an observable liar and scammer like lauda

What kind of board is this where you get a scam tag for presenting observable instances of lying and scamming by those voting themselves into DT and excluding any other persons that dare to call them out for the untrustworthy scum they have demonstrated themselves to be.

This is becoming one of the most horrendous environments of any forum out there.

The-One-Above-All

member

Activity: 252

Merit: 56

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: The-One-Above-All on May 08, 2019, 06:16:35 PM

DELETE 6

It seems only hilarious and co is allowed to throw insults at others and does not like any back his way

Do you have any proof that I don't like them or is this yet another lie from you? I actually love insults. Especially relevant and witty ones. Unfortunately you haven't said anything witty as of yet. I also don't see the insult. I asked a question since you refer to yourself as a group of people and in my opinion there's almost certainly only you, hence my diagnosis that you have some sort of dissociative disorder. Unless you'd like to fill us in on this other mystery person. I mean, we all know what game you're trying to play and who you mean, but that other person is you, therefore you're crazy and deluded.

Uses a quote with "seems" as a start lol? but even if that were not present.

" I actually love insults" - wow, you really proved we were lying. That was amazing. I don't think you understand the standard of observable evidence required to prove a person is lying. I think it is quite obvious that it is you the supporter or scammers and liars that is lying hilarious and co.

LOL, demands proof or it is lying, and then proceeds to guess, speculate and make false accusations.

"almost certainly" oh really. Well then its " almost certain" you don't like me insinuating the "we" could be me and your sister, or gf?

perhaps I am too busy "filling in" other people?

"in your opinion" - ha, you should have said, that is almost a guarantee it is garbage.

"Your diagnosis"? as a pro board spammer? who needs 2 sigs to spam with? Okay, well, we may skip your diagnosis then since you have only speculation, an observably weak mind, and likely no training in such areas.

"we all know"? - but have no proof? - therefore you know only what you think you know, perhaps you are wrong or lying ?

Get back to deleting on topic and relevant posts your scamming and lying friends tell you to delete and spamming both you sigs for some btc crumbs. WE will just enjoy our day knowing we are honest and fair.

Start appearing more fair and honest.

The-One-Above-All

member

Activity: 252

Merit: 56

DELETE 6

It seems only hilarious and co is allowed to throw insults at others and does not like any back his way

Another on topic and relevant post with a defensive reply to some random insult from the resident biased mod.

Quote from: hilariousandco on May 07, 2019, 06:36:24 AM

Quote from: The-One-Above-All on May 05, 2019, 05:54:02 PM

We just noticed our thread was deleted and there was not even a message about it either. Just vanished.

Who is we? You and your split personality?

Off topic and irrelevant.

Strange you try to push this insanity angle but can provide zero post examples you wish to bring as evidence. We note this is some subjective bullshit other low functioning idiots like tman wish to bring because in any other objective debate you will both be crushed.

Same for trying to push the "rubbish posts" but can not present examples.

The "we" could be myself and your girlfriend, your sister? perhaps we do lots of things together now, Who knows, and it does not matter. Just keep supporting "gray" dubious and shady characters on DT and deleting posts that are in opposition to that.

Mods should put the reason they deleted it, and it should show which mod deleted it. Transparency is key in this movement. We have reported over 20 (says 17 now ?) off topic irrelevant posts and 0 have been deleted simply because the mods are biased. On the other hand we have had 5 posts deleted each can be considered WAY more on topic than all of those 20 and 1 entire thread we started vaporized without a trace and no deletion confirmation.

Deleted posts metric is the new weapon to silence people with a ban. Each should be taken in full context or it is discrimination. In a system where mods are observably including scammers on DT and giving merit to their supporters garbage posts, their behaviors should be under close scrutiny by the entire board.

Every time you are rude to us. We are going to be rude to you hilarious, so start being polite and unbiased. Perhaps it would be beneficial if you had a split personality disorder . Then part of the time you can support observable scammers and part of the time members that have always been fair and never scammed anyone. Then you could perhaps be neutral and not net negative.

Treat us in the manner you wish to be treated. Thank you.

The-One-Above-All

member

Activity: 252

Merit: 56

Quote from: ?? on ??

You have been given evidence and do not accept it.

Quote from: ?? on ??

You intentionally misspell names to give them childish nicknames: "smarmacist", "cryptomanurebrainlessboss" etc., which can clearly considered as trolling.

"He likes to post false accusations and general low value noise." is one of your many false allegations. Your opinion =/= "the truth".

I'm not going to post an endless amount of quotes as "evidence". You're not worth the time.

EDIT: Why do you create self moderated topics? Any off-topic posts can be reported right?

Quote from: The-One-Above-All on April 25, 2019, 04:23:56 PM

This is the best you can provide after the generous extension I gave you?

Incorrect as usual. These name alterations are more befitting to the imbeciles that I award them to. Which names would you like to debate are not fitting to the individual. Is it trolling to call a smarmy sneaky trolling racist sock puppet sig spammer the smarmacist? I think not. It is a clever adaptation to inform the reader this is a smarmy, sneaky dirt bag.

The smarmacists above posts serves to refute your statement. It is incorrect (he has been challenged many times to provide observable instances of trolling he can not. His claims are false, his assumptions are groundless , they are net negative trash.

Bring his best original thought inspiring post here for me to pull to laugh at. Bring your own whilst your are at it.

Cryptomanurebrainlessboss again is a work of genius. Sums the sig spamming ass kissing shit for brains boss of nobody fool up perfectly. Most things he claims about merit and trust are observably incorrect and dumb driven by the desire to fill up his merits to spam his sig in a larger format.

Snitchmoon again a simple and informative title. Suchmoron again observably brilliant (not him) she is brilliant at debunking her own arguments I guess.

Notildah - again excellent and informative.

Moronbozo - no explanation required.

We create self moderated threads to keep the real idiots and trolls away like yourself. Be grateful we allowed you some thread time here.

We will delete your junk now since we feel you came with nothing after being given plenty of time to find some real evidence. We leave your quotes there though inside our own splendid posts.

Personally I think its pretty cowardly to post from alt accounts vs your main account for fear of retribution.Users should not tag you for having an opinion as long as you keep it civil.

I also find all this Local rule bullshit or self moderated threads a load of shit as well. I'm not only speaking about you here, speaking about everyone in general. When did everyone turn into a pussy? Noone wants to speak out for fear of a tag from a DT. Come on guys, quit treating this like it's fucking high school and everyone grow up.

Delete this post if you must but it's the truth.

Are you sure you posted this in the correct thread?

There is no evidence, there is someones incorrect opinion and failure to define trolling, as perfectly well explained in our own reply.

This seems unrelated to my previous post? which part are you replying to?

Let us remind you that unless you can present "video evidence" of the same person posting on any other account then it is speculation to call us an alt of anyone.

Even so the post seems like it was perhaps made for another thread? You can delete it or explain why it is on this thread. Or we can delete it.

The-One-Above-All

member

Activity: 252

Merit: 56

DELETE 5. ON TOPIC AND ATTEMPTING TO BRING THE THREAD THAT HAS BEEN DERAILED INTO FALSE ACCUSATIONS AND TROLLING BACK ON TOPIC AND CHALLENGE FOR EVIDENCE OF FALSE CLAIMS.

more biased moderation.

from this thread which we correctly noted was being derailed

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.50888121

Quote from: Bitcoin Forum

Quote

o_e_l_e_o

Is lying. Clearly cryptohunter would never attack any person that had not attacked him first. He is full of shit. Bring evidence of your claims and we will debunk them with ease.

AverageGlabella

Bring evidence of derailing EVERY thread please. This thread again has not been derailed the incidents mentioned are PRIME examples of EXACTLY what the intial post is referencing. There is should be NO NEED for appeals. You have a strong case or proof of a scammer that's the end of it. No begging or paying to have red removed. You don't get to scam and then be nice to the right people and the red is removed. You are a scammer You are always a scammer. You will ALWAYS be high risk. People that want to defraud others from their money are not given a second chance to do it again.

TMAN

1. we can demonstrate you are actually financially speaking HIGH RISK bordering on a scammer. You also support observable scammers.
2. Your claims of cryptohunter being unhinged are bogus

a/ you admitted you gave the red trust because he presented a facts and observable instances based post. When he said you can not give me red trust for presenting facts and observable instances about lauda you replied.

I can, I will and I just have. That is clear admission of this.

b/ Present examples of posts you believe indicate someone is unhinged. We will bring far more "worrying" and sexually deviant posts full of swearing cursing and all kinds of content that look to have spilled from the very damaged mind of your own.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/poetry-by-tman-5138619

that thread demonstrates not only are you damaged it also demonstrates that all the dumb fucks supporting this kind of thing as funny and brilliant but then call someone who adapts their username slightly to correctly represent who they really are as TROLLING and inappropriate and childish are actually insane themselves.

CONSTANTLY - highlighting that red trust is being used as a weapon to silence whistleblowers is not madness. The need for change is clear. Free speech is under serious threat here. Honest members that have never scammed or tried to scam are being given red tags by those that have observably tried to scam, extort, use dishonest tactics to boost their auction prices. FUCK THAT. It is the duty of every member. By allowing scammers and extortionists to take positions of trust you are putting at risk every member here.

SOME honest members seem to have sold out. They do NOT believe these people a not a risk to this community but have for their own sake decided to capitulate and give in to them. Not us. Remove our red tags and the red tags of every person that is not a scammer. Stop employing observable double standards. Only tag scammers and those you can present a STRONG case are going to scam.

This interaction between vod and ognasty demonstrate the obvious issue with allowing gangs of scammers with free reign to red trust for anything they like in DT

Quote from: Vod on February 22, 2018, 03:41:28 AM

Quote from: OgNasty on February 22, 2018, 03:38:21 AM

but this latest drama with Lauda has opened my eyes a bit...

Yeah, I've distanced myself with her. What can you do? You speak out and you get negative trust...

Quote from: Vod on February 24, 2018, 02:11:53 AM

How do I defriend Lauda without getting negative trust from her and ruining five years?

Quote from: OgNasty on April 06, 2018, 05:23:36 PM

Quote from: Vod on April 06, 2018, 05:14:26 PM

Quote from: OgNasty on April 06, 2018, 05:03:20 PM

Do you think it’s acceptable that Lauda hasn’t tagged aTriz yet? Do you think there is any reason why everyone shouldn’t tag aTriz for what he did?

Let me answer that this way - how can I leave negative trust for either of them without ruining my account?

As for your account being ruined if you tag one of them, I’m well aware. I guess the difference is that I do what I feel is right regardless of how it may effect me, and you appear to be having your true opinions silenced out of fear. So forgive me if I take your criticisms with a grain of salt.

DT is now a weapon for scammers to wield as they like. Most people on DT have no place inside the trust system. They are either dirty, or too weak to stand up against those that are.

Theymos "asking" people to get along and remove EVEN LEGITIMATE RED TAGS is not going to help. That simply allows scammers to roam around with 300 GREEN TRUST. (according to vods latest claims )

MAN UP - tell every DT member. Bring evidence of scamming or a VERY STRONG CASE they will scam. Or do not leave red trust. You fail to present evidence of scam or intent to scam you are BLACK LISTED.

What are you even doing allowing people with all of this dirt in their past getting on to DT?

All this be nice to scammers so they remove your red trust, don't mention they are scammers and kiss up to them to get along here. Fuck that.

This board is simply viewed as a cash cow by most DT, all wearing their gambling and mixing sigs. These sigs are not what real enthusiasts wear here. Where is your support of interesting new projects you believe in? this is purely financially motivated participation. Let's bring in some people that actually post and participate here because they love the idea behind it.

The only reason that could have been deleted is that we put what VOD had claimed that theymos ordered Ognasty to remove the laudas red tags or he was going to get blacklisted.

Still considering everyone else was derailing it to false accusations and trolling then this looks to be more biased moderation.
They allow others to go off topic and bring false accusations but again do not allow you to ask them to present evidence and debunk those false claims.

More weaponized post deletions.

The thread owner even quoted portion of our post and said we helped him coin a new phrase trust appeals.

The-One-Above-All

member

Activity: 252

Merit: 56

Quote from: TheNewAnon135246 on April 26, 2019, 01:00:24 AM

You should really consider to start taking your meds again. Feel free to delete this.

No we leave it there to demonstrate more foxpoop meriting on political grounds for shit posts like yours.

POST 4 NOW DELETED

More one sided corrupt moderators here colluding with scum bags to help them hide their dirty pasts. Also trying to weaponize the deleted posts gamed metric for getting people banned. These posts are not off topic, they are relevant (more than their posts) and still they get deleted.This forums slides more into an echo chamber daily.

So we noticed that the "shit posts so bad they are actually funny" thread had become another opportunity for shit posters and corrupt mods to flame honest whistle blowers and take the sides of observable liars and scammers and those with sickening double standards.

Quote from: cabalism13 on April 20, 2019, 10:45:27 PM

Quote from: Saint-loup on April 20, 2019, 07:49:56 PM

Your signature is better than mine, ok maybe you would be agree to give me your spot in this case?

Even if he agreed to give his spot to you, I don't think you can be qualified to enter the Chipmixer Campaign. Move on buddy. In fact, I can guess that you can't tell us what good things have you ever done here before...

This ain't ought to be funny but a SAVAGE one! Cool

Quote from: theymos on March 30, 2019, 12:09:05 PM

Quote from: cryptohunter on March 30, 2019, 10:15:43 AM

Which mod deleted it?

I did. Feel free to rant all you want in your own topics, but quit derailing unrelated topics.

(I just laughed about 2 seconds though Cheesy

)

This what I see after theymos post that to CH Cheesy

via Imgflip Meme Generator

We notice the mod that likes to enable observable scammers and liars,probable extortionists,trust abusers , and sneaky greedy racist trolling sig spammers on to DT to positions of trust wants to jump in with his own false accusations and general shit posting. Having this type of person with access to ANY private information is quite worrying. Obviously colluding with the observably untrustworthy bunch on here.

Quote from: hilariousandco on April 25, 2019, 05:30:12 AM

Quote from: cabalism13 on April 20, 2019, 10:45:27 PM

Quote from: theymos on March 30, 2019, 12:09:05 PM

Quote from: cryptohunter on March 30, 2019, 10:15:43 AM

Which mod deleted it?

I did. Feel free to rant all you want in your own topics, but quit derailing unrelated topics.

(I just laughed about 2 seconds though Cheesy

)

This what I see after theymos post that to CH Cheesy

via Imgflip Meme Generator

Ha. I never saw that one. Maybe that's why CH has sulked off pretending to be banned.

I wonder if he did actually get a short ban or just took the hint and started on another. Maybe he thinks he can have a separate account for trolling to save the other:

Quote from: theymos on March 30, 2019, 06:08:28 PM

Nothing in that huge rant has really anything to do with the case involving HostFat and therocktrading. You mentioned HostFat, but you didn't actually address anything related to the topic; you just tried yet another filibuster on your DT talking points.

We see you doing this over and over again. There are 61 good reports against you in the last 60 days. You're going to get banned if you keep this up.

We then quote a shit post that is so bad it is more than funny. I mean you can not actually get more funny that a person calling others evil and demanding they get red trust for selling their accounts that then goes and advertises for sale their own account can you?

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: hilariousandco on April 25, 2019, 05:30:12 AM

Quote from: cabalism13 on April 20, 2019, 10:45:27 PM

Quote from: theymos on March 30, 2019, 12:09:05 PM

Quote from: cryptohunter on March 30, 2019, 10:15:43 AM

Which mod deleted it?

I did. Feel free to rant all you want in your own topics, but quit derailing unrelated topics.

(I just laughed about 2 seconds though Cheesy

)

This what I see after theymos post that to CH Cheesy

via Imgflip Meme Generator

Quote from: theymos on March 30, 2019, 06:08:28 PM

LOL. Would be great if he was actually banned. Then we can pin his alts for ban evasion. This person may be intelligent but still has deep seeded psychiatric issues that border on the level of psychotic. I realize that's never been a valid reason to ban people in the past but rules is rules. Trolls are trolls, and spam is spam.

deep-seated? perhaps Notildah LOL

this one is hilarious, well not as hilarious as watching hilarious pretend to be objective and impartial. Still pretty funny I hope you all agree.

Nutildah lecturing others on selling their accounts and how untrustworthy and evil it is before trying to sell his own... or did he sell it?

Quote from: nutildah on October 02, 2014, 08:08:41 PM

Monitoring is underway.

I'm collecting two lists, one of account sellers and the other of account buyers. I will be sure to post this information, links and dates so everybody can see who to avoid from now on.

Quote from: nutildah on October 03, 2014, 02:05:48 PM

But this is obfuscated by the fact that most people don't know that they are reading the words of a bought account. There is no honesty or redeemable qualities in your arguments, you're simply trying to defend borderline evil behavior for your own selfish financial reasons.

followed by this posted by the same user in 2016

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.16312368

Name: nutildah
Posts: 2152
Activity: 560
Position: Hero Member
Date Registered: April 19, 2014, 11:50:27 AM
Trust: 0: -0 / +0

My posts were frequently contentious and sometimes downright argumentative, but that's because I'm a real person who was genuinely interested in bitcoin and this forum, and I wasn't just trying to build up an account to sell it or do sig campaigns.

Its a completely anonymous account, never been linked to my real identity. I stopped posting for the most part about 6 months ago.

I would like 0.3 BTC for it.

You can get back to me here or via PM. Thanks!

That was very funny

this is why he does not like people ~~trolling~~ telling the truth, they need to be banned. Please ban anyone who tells the truth about us. We don't like it. Makes us look foolish and ~~untrustworthy~~ EVIL.

now that post is indeed so shit it is funny, and a rebuttal to the false allegations and garbage hilarious and co spews out but can never provide any examples or evidence for . WAIT IT IS DELETED?

On what grounds if the others remain exactly??

TheNewAnon135246

legendary

Activity: 2198

Merit: 1989

฿uy ฿itcoin

You should really consider to start taking your meds again. Feel free to delete this.

The-One-Above-All

member

Activity: 252

Merit: 56

Quote from: ?? on ??

The-One-Above-All

member

Activity: 252

Merit: 56

Quote from: ?? on ??

Your posts are filled with false allegations, trolling and childish name calling. Try responding like an adult for once and I'm sure none of your posts will be deleted.

You have 2 hours to provide evidence of the false allegations, and trolling, you have apparently found contained within our above posts. If not ,I delete your post as garbage.

The-One-Above-All

member

Activity: 252

Merit: 56

Examples of deleted posts we disagree with. Reasons provided. It would seem responding to false accusations, or questioning unsubstantiated claims with a challenge, or pointing out observable double standards is not permitted flow.

1. Trust explanation in trust settings for improved forum peace

The following post contains smarmacists usual net negative shit post: containing false accusations, that he has been called on many times but failed to present any examples, therefore he is trolling again.

=============================================================================

Quote from: The Sceptical Chymist on April 18, 2019, 09:32:20 AM

Quote from: o_e_l_e_o on April 18, 2019, 07:38:03 AM

This is incorrect. Leaving positive trust for another user if you are DT1 does not make them DT2. This is achieved by adding their name to your own individual trust list.

Yep, that's the first thing I noticed, and I misunderstood that for quite a while before being corrected by Lutpin a while back. OP is certainly correct that there are a lot of misconceptions about the trust system, even among older members--and that's not surprising, since it is a bit complicated.

Quote from: SebastianJu on April 18, 2019, 06:34:13 AM

Explaining everyone the implications of the forum trust will make it possible to wipe out a good bunch of strife on the forum.

I applaud your effort here, SebastianJu, but I disagree with the above statement. Though a lot of members really don't understand the mechanics of how the trust system works, I seriously doubt educating people is going to reduce strife. Why? Because most of that strife stems from jealousy, resentment of authority, and hard feelings because of negative trust received by DT members. No amount of education is going to eliminate that. I'm confident members like cryptohunter, Thule, and that bunch of trolls know how everything works, and they're going to keep riling everybody up no matter how many tutorials are posted.

But again, this is a good effort on your part and should help people understand how the system works. That in itself is a good thing.

I disagree with the smarmacist. He likes to post false accusations and general low value noise. These types of net negative shit posts are pretty much his limit. I would expect that if red trust was reserved ONLY for scammers and those STRONGLY likely to scam, then their would be far far less conflict. Until that happens I suspect trust abusers will be called to answer for their observably untrustworthy actions on a regular basis, by those that wish to see the standards of free speech we have seen here over the years, continue.

=====================================================================================

The post that is deleted here simply makes a rebuttal to pharmacists false accusations, a sensible suggestion that WOULD increase forum peace, and a sensible statement regarding pharmacists general net negative shit posts (he has been challenged many times to present some of his original thought inspiring posts and he can not present even 1,) The repeated trolling claims from him have been debunked many times previously. We did not even mention that he again is whining on about trolling when he was caught red handed being a sneaky greedy racist trolling sig spammer under a sock puppet HugeBlackWoman (which again would highlight his double standards net negative shit posts)

2. Another sensible challenge to a claim lacking evidence , on a thread about earning money on the forum by posting and other means.

=====================================================================================

Quote from: CryptopreneurBrainboss on April 18, 2019, 06:18:15 AM

Quote from: The-One-Above-All on April 18, 2019, 05:56:50 AM

Can you please provide some of your very best posts here for perusal.

He doesn't have to prove anything to anyone or you. His record says it all. With the merit system it'll be hard for any spammer to make it pass the member rank status. You don't have to be an extraordinary poster to recieve some merit, instead of hating on those that are receiving merit they deserve maybe if you take you time to read through their post history, you'll learn one or two on producing quality post. If you have gone through his post history and can't find a quality post then you need some help. The problem is from you not him.

You seem to be going off topic - so just present his posts for people to examine for some benchmarks to earn some btc crumbs each month or not. I don't need your 3rd world ass kissing for merits speech.

What record?

Couldn't locate any sign of an original thought inspiring post anywhere? Their posts consist a lot of regurgitated and ass kissing junk to keep favor with the merit cyclers here.
If you can not present anything of worth for me to examine after claiming there are many to the point the are impossible to miss. Then I will need to question your merit source application. It would seem you do not have the genetic capacity to distinguish a post of value from low value noise.

=====================================================================================

Another sensible reply deleted. The cryptomanurebrainlessboss is claiming that if you review LFC BTC posts it will be impossible to miss the excellent merit worthy contributions. He is pretty much claiming if you just present worthless junk like LFC BTC you will soon be getting merits, and earning like him. I am asking him to present one example of an excellent post LFC BTC has made. He can not find one obviously?

3. A thread where the Mod Hilarious and co is defending his actions against MDO.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.50736638

MDO makes several claims that Hilarious and co is treating him in a different way to which he treats other members, we believe this claim does have some clear grounding.

=================================================================================
Quotes below from MDO

"I need to understand forum moderation policy. Is it specific for individuals?"

"Not sure how many more users are victim of your bullshits and master manipulation"

"I have issues with this dipshit hilariousetc aka global mod hilariousandco. To me he is nothing but a blatant liar, a master manipulator who is using his influence in the forum."

Quotes from hilarious and co.

"There isn't any. Master manipulation is laughable. What have I manipulated exactly and for what gain? What do I get from exposing you? Are you saying liars, scammers and merit abusers shouldn't be outed? "

"There's a slither of doubt because there's no concrete evidence only circumstantial, but as you said I strongly believe them to be the same based on the evidence we've already been through. There's too many coincidences and quirks though. If this was taken to court then a jury probably wouldn't convict based on not enough concrete evidence, but that doesn't mean that there's no guilt, just not enough to convict. Plenty of people get away with crimes because of this. Everyone knows OJ killed his wife but that wasn't found to be in a court of law"

"I wouldn't say malicious but the ponzi promoting to me is an issue and I would question the lengths he will go to make money. Had he received money from the escrow he may have immediately vanished. Or he may have performed his escrow duties as hoped but I would have been very surprised if that happened, but I guess we'll never know."

=================================================================================

Our sensible on topic and highly relevant reply that demonstrates clearly that MDO does have reason to question and highlight hilarious and co "DIFFERENT" approach to his "friends" behaviors of lying, scamming, and other things that likely meet the OJ threshold of guilt that he mentions.

==============================================================================

MDO is claiming you seem to be treating him unfairly. I would say that he does have a compelling case. I will explain.

I say this because you clearly seem far more "worried" about the lengths he would go to to earn money based on supporting some ponzi. This you claim is an issue for you.

However, it is observable that you seem far LESS worried about other members who have observably lied to dupe investors for financial gain (scamming), they have abused trust to silence members discussing their pasts, they have been implicated in SERIOUS extortion schemes? and yet you are not only NOT worried about them?? You actually feel that you should support them on DT1 and vouch for them? So either he has a clear case or you are very very confused about the types of people you should worry about and have issue with?

How about explaining this to the board so we can understand your reasoning here? I personally could care less if MDO has red or leaves the board. However, double standards from persons in positions of trust are concerning. You should take a stand AGAINST observable scammers and liars and trust abusers and yet you seem to take THEIR side against honest members.

=================================================================================

4. SEE BELOW