Neither you or Anonymint has an arguable point. He would argue that the Religious Warmer's co2/lag argument is "this time it's different", which is not impossible but a recognized logical problem.
No I argued the irrefutable point that they have presented no falsifiable science, because they are just picking models out of their ass assuming some variables matter but not others, finding one of many possible statistical correlations, and declaring that to be cause & effect.
That is not science.
Maybe one day you will learn what science is.
Perhaps you might even learn what aliasing error and long-tail distributions are.
It is not my burden to prove them wrong, it is their burden to prove something using real science.
Not surprised this behavior stems from a man in the bubble of academia. I'd like to think, in a normal world, this man's reputation would be completely tarnished and nobody would want to interact with him anymore, but I know this isn't true.
$150 trillion global debt bubble with $quadrillion of derivatives and another $quadrillion of unfunded social commitments can do this to society.
Razing that to stumps isn't going to be pleasant.
I have never met a scientist who is not deeply concerned about global warming, or an internet nut who is. My favorite is that this is a "hoax". lol
So, 99% of all climate scientists met secretly and decided it would be hilarious if they threw away their carers and Ph.Ds as a joke? "I went to college for 12 years, but this too cool to not do!!!"" Or maybe, just maybe, the guy with a 7th. grade education typing from his mom's trailer could be wrong.
No no you're not getting it. It's not a joke, it's a conspiracy. We scientists made a deal with the major world governments that we'll fabricate an excuse to create a carbon tax, and they'll share half the money with us. I've personally made over a million dollars by peddling these lies about so-called "global warming"!
And while we're on the subject, I'm kind of disappointed that we haven't heard from creationists on this thread yet. Who will volunteer to debunk evolution in under three sentences?
No you just like getting funded for building models all day. You could careless how those models are used to make nonsense conclusions on a larger scale.
Analogous to Medicare recipients aren't intent on bankrupting the USA, they just like getting their healthcare.
This is how socialism ends. Nasty, very nasty.
Heck, I can do it in three words: God did it.
Obviously. He's also responsible for global warming:
http://www.defectiveyeti.com/archives/001867.htmlWTF, I'm a greedy scientist! Where is my invite!!
I guess you haven't been lying as much as the rest of us
key word: Funding. Money does not need people to meet secretly. Right now if you want to have a chance to have your research funded, does not matter what, make sure to add the words "climate", "green energy", "human impact on nature", etc.
Follow the money. We are all humans. We love money. Even tree hugging scientists like Al Gore.
As a world-renowned expert in failing to get research grants, let me give you a pro tip: Never say what everyone else is saying. The best way to get funding is by claiming you can break the consensus, not by reinforcing it. Going against common wisdom adds sex-appeal to your grant application.
Oh and Al Gore is a politician, not a scientist. Also an egomaniac
Al Gore is a scientist: he has an Oscar that proves it. And don't forget:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BnFJ8cHAlco https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8E42mIvjzRwAnd yes he is a fucking scientist. Well, at least an honorary fucking scientist.
http://www.knoxnews.com/news/2010/feb/26/al-gore-in-line-for-honorary-doctorate-from-ut/And
he created the internet.