Topic: Ree @hacker1001101001 ICO bump account - page 8. (Read 5749 times)

Best to just constantly place your apparent mistakes in the context of suchmoon and malborozas friends scamming and far more dangerous behaviors.

Constant defence is a mistake.. attack their double standards.

I have answered that already, so stop steering bullshit and acting like a scam buster when you are behind peanuts. More stupid thing about your witch hunt here is that my mistake was done year's back and you are pretending to protect from nothing.

To prove you to be more dump and double standard here check your own comment on Lauda's red trust due to the merit transactions.


Most of your judgments are double standards here, and in same way you promote abuse. The flag started by Lauda doesn't makes sense or is not warrant. Your move of supporting it makes that more shit.

---

Poor judge of character...hmmm

Are you sure you are right at judging characters here ?

Btw, just due to your ability to judge character here, is it Ok to start a type 1 flag if I think someone has an highly evil character in himself and they are even high risk to deal with as "personal information" is not safe with them and you could be blackmailed or harassed with it in the future. I even have a case study to put it as a reference to prove personal information in there hand can posses a high risk.

Lol at suchmoon the scammer supporter.

Peanuts? Like willing to facilitate scams for pay nutildah? Or try to delete the evidence nutildah? Or peanuts like scammer lauda pushing massive scams and lying repeatedly to pump it to dump his bags?? Those peanuts??

If hacker is a paid ico bumper that is nothing near as bad as either of those 2 scum bags you protect and support

Same for zorrobek ..i mean malboroza protecting and supporting scammers whilst going after ico paid bumpers.

The shame is the semi good guys here are kinda pathetic and wimpy. Stop the handbags fighting and pull out the desert eagle and crush these scumbags on every single thread they make. Find their projects, escrow offerings, campaigns  every revenue stream they have .
Push their sponsors to kick them off.  They should not be getting paid for pushing double standards  and scammers should not be getting paid from this forum full stop.

Man up wimps. Take them down. Projects do not want to be associated with scammers. The evidence is there. Use it.

I dont consider being a paid bumper as bad as a blatant scammer or willing scam facilitator for pay.  I dont see conclusive proof either.
Suchmoon is a duplicitous scammer assmuncher. She claims you must be banned for presenting the truth about her friends scamming.
Suchmoon says that is trolling and you should be banned

Bogus thread, trying go hold others to standards they are happy to bend for themselves and their friends.

Lol at these nothing burger claims in the context old her pals proven crimes

You sound like a someone who might be an already existing expert on such topic, to the extent any someone could be such an expert.  

 

your enemy's enemy is not your friend and your friend's friend is not your friend. Someone must start a topic about this.

I don't know how "persistant" it is but hacker1001101001 sure has done a lot of untrustworthy shit, from plagiarism to ICO bumping to deceptive sockpuppeting and lying about it... if you don't care about that stuff in your guild it doesn't mean that others must not care either.

It looks to me like it's pretty much the opposite than what you're saying, as it often is the case with users that you add to your trust list because they talk/act favorably towards you - it's not so much about Lauda but more about your inability to admit that you're a poor judge of character.

Lol, ignore him, not even his BFF Ognasty is going to agree with him. Proof:



....and you don't see tec's hare screeming there "witch hunt", "peanuts", "retribution for calling someone out". You don't even see him saying now "it happened long time ago"   Atriz was tagged for ICO lie and hacker1001101001 was payed to lie

It's called deflection! TECSHARE is deflecting payed-fake-positive-ICO-bump-review investigation!

There is nothing about my timeline that is contrived. He was critical of Lauda, and merited one of my posts critical of them. A negative rating was left the SAME DAY for the merit. After they were called out on the obvious retaliatory nature of it, Lauda changed it up to something else to make it look as if it was legitimate as they have done on numerous other occasions when they are called out on their abuse of the trust system.

It has nothing to do with "immunity", it is the fact that these actions are being taken purely in retaliation, not in any way to try to protect the community from anything. More show me the man I will find you the crime bullshit from the clown car. Nothing hacker1001101001 has done warrants this kind of persistant attention. This is the same kind of bullshit you limp dicks pulled constantly haranguing Quickseller and many others for no other reason than your personal satisfaction. You aren't fooling anyone. This is self serving, not community serving.

All I'm saying that your contrived timeline doesn't make sense nor is there some immunity rule that disallows looking into user's past shady dealings once they say a bad word about someone.

Otherwise you wouldn't have been able to go looking for peanuts on nutildah. Don't tell me you're jealous that you didn't find anything and marlboroza did LOL.

Deflection is very usual practice among ICO payed bump accounts, please don't let him move this topic into different direction.
Of course you can because you are bump account.

Anything about this https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.53987190 and this https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.54171090 yet?

That was a good thing to do for sure, and he is also on my ignore list.
Just to be safe and keep more distancing from him and his posts 

OK COOMER

PAY NO ATTENTION TO THE CUNT BEHIND THE CURTAIN! YOU ARE BEING PUNISHED FOR THE CRIMES I HAVE DECLARED YOU GUILTY OF AND IS IN NO WAY RETRIBUTION FOR DARING TO CRITICIZE ME. ALSO FORGET THE LONG HISTORY I HAVE OF DOING THIS TO MULTIPLE INDIVIDUALS REPEATEDLY! SO SAYETH THE GRAND JIZZARD OF SCHNOZ!

Where and how it started does not excuse you from your actions. Take responsibility for them and stop whining like a child already.

To make you more clear and right SIR, it more precisely started here


when I have gave merit to one of your post I liked and felt the information in the post had some logical meaning because of which Lauda got offended with it as far as giving me a red trust and starting a witch hunt around me by abusing both trust and flag system now. And as always there gang members started licking Lauda's word's here as much as they can to be a part of the cult. Objective Standards Guild is way better than the evil cult, could even be out of once understanding.

For someone who seriously wants to judge should surely see the reference attached to the above feedback. Lowest level shit and prove of this being nothing more than puenut hunting witch hunt. I guess I could find more bigger ICO scams faster than what time marlboroza has invested here in this thread until, but he doesn't witch hunt accounts randomly.

Did hacker1001101001 actually hacked anyone in his life or is he just a fake hacker wannabe?
Interesting topic to read for sure

I doubt very much there is anything related to actual hacking associated with him. His associated alt-accounts all seem to have their own different personalities so there is no evidence there was ever hacking on his part but to be fair as far as I know, before I added him to my IGNORE list I never read any of his posts where he claimed to be a hacker.

Thank you for the good laugh The zombie gang, huh? Maybe this is same breed with TECSHARE's Objective Standards Guild? It seems that gang has been also resurrected somehow  

I guess that is what happens when your nose is buried so deep in the turd, you lose all context. So tell me, what imminent threat to the community does hacker100101001 pose that necessitates this level of persistent attention?