The most popular product of it would be the Tether. I always use it more than the ETH version. There is also BUSD from Binance but Tether from TRC20 is much popular. It is accepted on most crypto sites that I visit and also on crypto wallets that I am using. Overall, It's not about the network but it's about how the token is created. There are lots of failed ERC20 tokens before in case you don't know. It happened in the ICO era.
Technically speaking, there is no difference between Binance's BEP-20 and Ethereum's ERC-20 token standards. It's just that BRC-20 token transfers are cheaper and faster because BSC (Binance Smart Chain) has greater transaction capacity than Ethereum (ETH). But that doesn't mean it will stay like that forever. If BSC becomes heavily-congested, then fees will be the same (or even higher) than ETH. I think most people will choose ERC-20 tokens because of their first-mover advantage on the market. These tokens can be used nearly anywhere, unlike Binance's counterpart.
I've previously mentioned something about BRC-20 tokens being inferior than ERC-20 tokens, and turns out, I was right. You can't just make a complex token with the BRC-20 standard than either the ERC-20 or BEP-20 token standards. Besides, ERC-20 is a little outdated. The new ERC-1155 multi-token standard is a much better choice. We may start seeing an equivalent version on BSC soon. Who knows if these two giants (BSC and ETH) will completely change the "De-Fi" landscape in the future? Just my thoughts