Topic: REJECTING FOR WHITELISTING WITHOUT ANY NOTIFICATION (Read 353 times)

I did my research. I interviewed many spammers here.  They provided their application texts for my investigation.

It turned out that LoyceV reviews and approves only the most tearful and emotional applications. If the application is not tearful and emotional enough, then Loysev rejects it, that is, ignores it

In short: if there is not enough self-deprecation in the application, then you will not be added to the white lists

If I'm not wrong then LoyceV never asked anyone to beg him to get whitelisted on the forum. Do you have any proofs that he asked someone to beg before him to get whitelisted? It's not an easy job to white list so many members and LoyceV is also a human and that's why he can't whitelist hundreds of accounts a day.

Those who know code and programming can't be stopped by that evil fees because if they're already technically good then they can use find a way to register their accounts anyway. However, the ones who aren't technocrats and who want to learn about Bitcoin can send whitelisting request to LoyceV and if their requests are convincing then he will white list them without any discrimination.

Coders and programmers don't know how to write tearful letters. This is the lot of humanitarians and poets. For this reason, it is not techies who end up on the white lists, but some mediocrities who do not understand code and Bitcoin (but these mediocrities know how to tearfully beg and humiliate themselves in front of LoyceV)

Dear applicants of the whitelisting. If your request was ignored you can complain here. Let's make bitcointalk great again


Even if LoyceV considers everyone to be spammers. What right does he have not to inform applicants that their application has been rejected?

I get the impression that it doesn't perform the assigned functions. Even if he is a volunteer, he must perform his assigned functions conscientiously.

Because without sending back responses to applicants stating that their applications were rejected, LoyceV may simply be shirking and not even fulfilling his duties. No one will even know whether LoyceV performing the assigned functions or not. LoyceV can use one phrase to excuse yourself, “I’m tired of sending back replies because my email is full of incoming messages,” and be shirking and not fulfilling his functions. It's impossible to check how well LoyceV performed his functions

But if LoyceV will respond to every letter and reports that "the your application for adding to the whitelists" was rejected, then this will be the best evidence that he really performs the functions assigned to himself


You're just trying to seem like one.
To be truly neutral, fair and impartial, its not neceesary to join in Foxpup Merit Cycling Club
Truly honest people don't need any clubs to be honest.

I think you're playing to the crowd and trying to appear neutral. And in order to give yourself legitimacy, you joined this FOXPUP club to finally consolidate your imaginary authority.
I'll repeat it again. No amount of clubs will make a person honest and true neutral - if he is shit inside


P.S: This topic is not only about LoyceV. This is a full list of whitelisting-managers: LoyceV, SFR10, Welsh, hugeblack and Upgrade00. You can complain here about all of them here

I asked some spammers on the forum and they shared some interesting information with me.

One spammer who never used a proxy and logging-in from the same IP address complained that he was never adding to the whitelists. At first sight, this proves that LoyceV does the job well . But by what methods? And I will answer to you: By the cost of users privacy! This makes it clear to everyone that LoyceV has access to IP addresses

Another more experienced spammer who used different proxies for each of his accounts told me that all his proxybanned accounts were added to whitelists and then unbanned

Draw your own conclusions, gentlemen. LoyceV has access to IP-addresses

Explain one thing to me

Is this a cryptopunks forum? Forum of technies and crypto-enthusiasts? We all exist here thanks to the Bitcoin code.

Then why are only the most tearful and emotional requests accepted for whitelisting?

Is this a forum of emotional poets and tearful lyricists or what?

Because if the applications of the proxybanned persons are not quite tearful and emotional, then LoyceV will not add him to the whitelists 100%. Everybody should know it

System is not perfect. But this does not mean that this that LoyceV can use his whitelisting powers for satisfying his pervert needs. System is not perfect. But this does not mean that that the system should not develop and improve

F*cking pervert supposedly to protect against spammers forces proxybanned users to write him tearful and emotional letters as a condition of adding to whitelists.

These spammers have a lot of money and they will never write to LoyceV. It’s just easier for spammers to pay the evil fee

Real people writes to LoyceV hoping for his authority. And he just spits on them and calls everyone spammers


Down with LoyceV's mockery of techies, coders and other peoples with mathematical thinking

Not giving a fuck to an extent is a trait I feel everybody should have. There are things people should give a fuck about, but it's certainly not something like what you accuse him of.
The aim is to reduce spammers are much as possible, you don't possibly think that's an easy task.

As he already said, the system is not perfect, but it's better. If he and other staff who have the power to whitelist have whitelisted a few spammers without knowing, best believe they have also rejected a few genuine people without knowing.

You must be kidding.
Name at least one service that supports such microscopic microtransactions the size of that "evil fees"?

It should to remove LoyceV - and bring back Grin MimbleWimble (or implement something similar)

So they should pay the evil fee to remove the restrictions on an alt account only to complain about not being whitelisted when they requested and not getting a rejection email?
That seems like a whole lot of trouble for very little reward.

I'll kindly request other users quoting the OP exclude my name to avoid the repetitive notifications from telegram about this topic.

The forum must stop paying LoyceV right away!   

They can complain here through their friends on the bitcointalk.org.

Example


LOL. Are you sure?  

"When there are no arguments to justify yourself". That's what it's called

Wait, what have I missed here? Do you expect the proxy-banned users to come here and express their complaints? Can they write any post, anywhere on the forum, how will they write anything if they are waiting for approval to access the forum?

Probably to delete your post, which is an offtopic

Thick-Skinned Gangs and assumptions about who pays whom are not discussed upon here. This is an offtopic here

Here we discuss the actions of dishonest whitelist-managers who ignore applicants

I thought you were a Thick-Skinned Gang Leader 
You knew the purpose of this thread from the beginning.

---

To Shenanigan, who pays for this job? What if LoyceV chooses not to respond to anyone and what if never whitelists anyone? Who could create some pressure? theymos? I don't think so. Who are you to question about his responsibility? He is doing it voluntarily and whenever he is free. Why a self-moderated thread? Are you afraid of being criticized? 

What makes you think that I need this advice? Address your advice to those who need it.

What makes you think that I have some kind of problem? I created this topic for volunteer purposes specifically for those who have this problem. For those people who cannot complain here about dishonest behavior of whitelist-managers.

Wow. This is great.
LoyceV is a volunteer and I am also a volunteer.

What nonsense are you talking about? These screenshots should be posted here by those who suffered from your actions. Applicants write to you from their emails, risking their privacy, and you stupidly ignore them

In fact, you collect and record these email addresses of applicants, which can then be used for the purposes of blackmail and manipulation. And in return you don't even consider their applications.

In fact, you ignore their requests for whitelisting, but while adding their email addresses to your database

You get everything. They get nothing.

BULLSHIT
It seems to me that you specifically received this position to satisfy your pervert inclinations. This LoyceV seems to love it when people humiliate themselves in front of him. If your letter is not tearful enough, you will not be added to the whitelists. Everybody should know this

No explicit rules were mentioned besides trying to make sure the users whitelisted are not ban evaders. And most users keep sending emails after a rejection mail has been sent to them, so I can understand LoyceV's position here.

You're free to make a thread and other users are proxybanned users are free to reach out to other users and complain here. But that wouldn't make the process more efficient.

We're talking about LoyceV to a greater extent because he receives the most requests from applicants due to the fact that he is more famous on the forum than you

It's to the LoyceV. I dont have access to the [email protected]

If you want a fresh proofs about LoyceV lazyness & negligence, there is a recent:

That's right, we're talking about ----> [email protected] and not --->  [email protected].

and I mentioned a specific period, which is December 31 to January 15.

---

So you don't have a list of screenshots?

LoyceV claims his mailbox is full of requests. A HUNDRED OF TIMES

Can you provide me with a screenshot of the emails you are referring to? I will review it. the last email I received was on January 11, and since the beginning of this year I have only received 3 emails.

In the past, I approved some accounts that were rejected by @LoyceV, so if you contacted @LoyceV, SFR10, Welsh, and Upgrade00 and they were all rejected, then the problem must be related to you.

In general, I have no objection to creating a topic about anyone whose request to be included in the whitelist was rejected for no reason. Just make it a non self-moderated topic.

This topic is not for you and your neutral rubbish feedings. Say thank you that I even allow you to be here

This topic for complaints of applicants who was rejected for whitelisting

All stupid questions - it's to the Thermos. I don't know why he allows self-moderated topics to be created in this section.

I’m also not going to feed the DT system trolls - that’s why I made the topic self-moderating.

Read:

If I'd provide those statistics, you'd say you can't verify them. I can give you an estimate: I must have rejected about 1000 requests. About 20% of them didn't even send me their username.

---

---

Consider this the last time I'm feeding this troll.

You are not neutral, you "don't-give-a-f*ck" man

Stop dodging and answer the questions.



LOL. neitral troll is trolling

I've been called "Switzerland" for being neutral and subtle. In your case, I'll make an exception. You, sir, are an idiot for opening 2 topics about me instead of posting in my reputation thread

If you want forum changes, post in Meta. If you want to attack me for whatever reason you made up: knock yourself out
Why don't you complain about all Staff members that have the ability to whitelist users? Or hey, complain about theymos who blocked spammers.

But hey, by all means, keep complaining instead of contributing.
Here's what matters: I've whitelisted 294 users, they earned 11699 Merit in total, and only 6 of them got banned. The system isn't perfect, spammers are the reason we can't have nice things.

First why this thread is self-moderated?

Second, not only those members, but forum staffs can whitelist too.

Dear proxybanned applicants, who was rejected for whitelisting by LoyceV, SFR10, Welsh, hugeblack and Upgrade00
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/remove-proxyban-evil-fees-email-to-get-whitelisted-for-free-5350260

You can complain here. If you have friends on the forum, you can ask them to report it here

Also I have a question


Is such behaviour allowed? Otherwise, it seems that LoyceV did not rejecting the applicants, but is simply sleeping and not performing his functions. A convenient cover for not fulfilling one's duties. I consider that every applicant should receive a letter confirming the rejection of their application.

How can one generally determine whether a person is fulfilling his whitelisting function or not? If there are no statistics on rejected users?

He may be doing everything at random. No control over LoyceV
With the same success, I can add everyone to the whitelists at random and then report here that the work is done

User LoyceV should be punished. His rights of whitelisting should be revoked due negligence