Topic: LoyceV's reputation thread (Read 3175 times)

Since 2021 I registered in this forum, I haven't seen this thread. But after reading Op, I had no choice than to increase my respect for you, which I have had right from my newbie days.
There was when I discovered I was in DT2, I didn't use it to hunt anyone down and I didn't see it as additional power against the weak. DT power is to sanitize this forum and prevent scammers and cheaters from thriving.

I respect your approach to matters and sense of judgement. You are great!

I'm back in civilization And nobody was looking for me

In case anyone's looking for me: I'm currently stranded due to car trouble. It's quite .... how should I call this .... inconvenient

Context can be important, but maybe for the purpose of your highlighting of the matter, you are not necessarily wanting to get bogged down too much into context (for now), just building up a list... perhaps?

But just your proclaiming that you are not necessarily considering context, causes me to consider my own behaviors in terms of either good names or bad names that I might give to other members, and sometimes I will make some pretty "extreme assertions" about some other member(s), and sometimes I am merely attempting to emphasize some kind of point (so I don't necessarily even literally mean what I had said), and other times, I might be trying to negotiate some kind of a situation or win an argument, and in those contexts the emphasis could be made to try to win the argument, throw the other person off (attempt to cause them to become emotional) or even to distract a bit from the actual main substantive points (or overall subject matter being discussed).

I've been called things that are too good to forget, but never kept an overview. I'll start now:
(quotes may or may not have been taken out of context)

Exactly what I’d expect an agent to say

It's fine. We're all here for the technology of course (LOL) so it makes sense that you're fitting right in if you're an NSA bot.

Also the US government doesn't really pay well, or so I'm told.

This is new:
I'm not sure if I should feel flattered, or offended. I do feel like I'm missing out on a nice big fat government paycheck though

I took this quote to this topic because I don't want to go further off-topic.

A bit

It varies, sometimes I bump a user up to the next Rank based on their overall good posts.

Sorry to hear you're feeling like that. Is it also the case you have a lot to get rid of? If it were me I'd just bung them at people almost regardless of which of their posts. I guess it might smack to you of favouritism or even decision-making (gah!), but surely there are generally-agreed upon people who could do with big bumps? And especially in places you don't haunt, where they can get on with it without you having to go through their colleagues' stuff? Probably would encourage them to keep up with the flow. But maybe it's just not how you roll.

I didn't reload the page after meriting this post, and when I came back a bit later I merited it again. No big loss, but it feels like I'm getting sloppy trying to get rid of all my source sMerits lately.

Please no off topic speculation. You must not be permitted to support scamming by labelling proof of scamming as trolling and using other unfair moderator tactics to prevent honest members receiving valid warnings.

Where there is undeniable proof of scamming you should be working with those presenting the evidence to ensure the warnings are as impactful as possible not seeking to shelter and protect scammers from punishment and preventing honest members receiving the opportunity to learn the truth about proven scammers here.

You left suchmoons post there. This is clear scammer supporting leaving the dispute support post for a flag based on proof of scamming but removing the support the flag link and evidence it is based upon.

Strong scammer supporting there. Do you deny it.

Explain your actions. You are clearly trying to assist the take down of a legitimate and important warning regarding a proven scammer.

Go debunk the evidence of proven scamming first.

I'm glad you found the right thread cryptohunter, too bad you drag your off topic drama in here though.

Lauda's post was deleted too. For transparency, I left a link to view the deleted posts.

LoyceV the scammer supporter has just deleted my legitimate flag support request from his flag support thread?

The flag I posted there is based on incontrovertible proof of scamming by his friend lauda.

LoyceV the scammer facilitator has long sought to label undeniable evidence of scamming by his scamming DT friends as trolling. 

Thus attempting to cast doubt over legitimate scammer warnings.

Here is the post that scammer supporter and sneaky scammer facilitator loyceV deleted unfairly.





This is a clear lie
Readers should examine the undeniable evidence of scamming here

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/support-flag-for-scammer-lauda-explain-in-meta-if-you-dispute-the-flag-5249969

When people are correctly stating the coins you are promoting are from a instamined project, the investors deserve to know the truth.
Just because you want to dump your coins from a instamined project on others you can not tell lies about being on the launch so you can confirm there was no instamine
You can not promulgate that lie several times on different occasions.

Then when you have sold your bags of coins later claim yes that was an instamine scam.

This is lying for financial gain.

You dont get to change your mind about something you stated was true before ?

Either you were on the launch and can say for sure there was no instamine

Or you were not.

Cant say oh yeah I changed my mind that wasn't true actually. Yeah that is called lying not changing your mind such moon scammer supporter

Bullshit.

Examine the evidence and then realise all scammers can just say they changed their minds? So then they were not lying and scamming?
What an idiot suchmoon is.



Indefensible scamming support the flag.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/support-flag-for-scammer-lauda-explain-in-meta-if-you-dispute-the-flag-5249969