[RELEASE] Liquidcoin (Speculation based) - page 6.

ehmdjii

sr. member

Activity: 351

Merit: 250

what are the dependencies to compile? i am getting:

Code:

root@sadfwww:~/Liquidcoin/src# make -f makefile.unix
makefile.unix:131: warning: overriding commands for target `obj/nogui/scrypt.o'
makefile.unix:128: warning: ignoring old commands for target `obj/nogui/scrypt.o'
g++ -c -pthread -Wno-invalid-offsetof -Wformat -g -DNOPCH  -DUSE_UPNP=0 -DUSE_SSL -fstack-protector-all -Wstack-protector -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,-z,now -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -O2 -MMD -o obj/nogui/crypter.o crypter.cpp
In file included from crypter.cpp:9:0:
headers.h:36:20: fatal error: db_cxx.h: No such file or directory
compilation terminated.
make: *** [obj/nogui/crypter.o] Error 1

caish5

sr. member

Activity: 324

Merit: 250

Now it's fixed
Thanks

Nicksasa

sr. member

Activity: 288

Merit: 250

Quote from: caish5 on January 18, 2012, 08:31:43 AM

I'm still getting the same error.

Hold on, lgdi32 was in the global LIBS define aswell.
Pushed to git.

caish5

sr. member

Activity: 324

Merit: 250

I'm still getting the same error.

bulanula

hero member

Activity: 518

Merit: 500

Quote from: markm on January 18, 2012, 08:07:32 AM

This thing isn't real scrypt, right? Its the deliberately bastardised pretend/fake scrypt deliberately nerfed for the convenience of botnets who are using other people's computers without their permission thus need to try to conceal the fact they are running?

How large a botnet are you running anyway, and why do you need a new coin to run on it, isn't litecoin already tuned ideally for botnet use?

-MarkM-

It is good to see that at least some of us here have the guts to say it like it really is.

Well done markm and screw all these botnet operators getting bored with LTC.

markm

legendary

Activity: 2940

Merit: 1090

Yeah but that is the nerfed down pretend-scrypt used by litecoin, right? Deliberately toned down so botnets can use it. Because using a proper version of scrypt would make people whose machine have been infected by botnets notice something is being processed.

So basically there still aren't any alt-coins using a proper full scrypt, they are all just fakes set up for botnets to deploy.

-MarkM-

Nicksasa

sr. member

Activity: 288

Merit: 250

Quote from: caish5 on January 18, 2012, 08:06:59 AM

/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgdi32
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [liquidcoin] Error 1

Note that i can build other coins so i do have correct dependencies.

Try with the latest git, seems the unix libs line wasn't in the .pro for some reason

drakahn

hero member

Activity: 504

Merit: 500

my scrypt miners sure seem to work on it anyway

Nicksasa

sr. member

Activity: 288

Merit: 250

Quote from: markm on January 18, 2012, 08:07:32 AM

This thing isn't real scrypt, right? Its the deliberately bastardised pretend/fake scrypt deliberately nerfed for the convenience of botnets who are using other people's computers without their permission thus need to try to conceal the fact they are running?

How large a botnet are you running anyway, and why do you need a new coin to run on it, isn't litecoin already tuned ideally for botnet use?

-MarkM-

Huh ? It's based on Tenebrix including it's scrypt algo so ...

markm

legendary

Activity: 2940

Merit: 1090

This thing isn't real scrypt, right? Its the deliberately bastardised pretend/fake scrypt deliberately nerfed for the convenience of botnets who are using other people's computers without their permission thus need to try to conceal the fact they are running?

How large a botnet are you running anyway, and why do you need a new coin to run on it, isn't litecoin already tuned ideally for botnet use?

-MarkM-

caish5

sr. member

Activity: 324

Merit: 250

/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgdi32
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [liquidcoin] Error 1

Note that i can build other coins so i do have correct dependencies.

Nicksasa

sr. member

Activity: 288

Merit: 250

Quote from: caish5 on January 18, 2012, 07:30:10 AM

The github won't build in linux (Ubuntu 11.10)

What errors ?

caish5

sr. member

Activity: 324

Merit: 250

The github won't build in linux (Ubuntu 11.10)

Nicksasa

sr. member

Activity: 288

Merit: 250

Quote from: Stokkie on January 18, 2012, 06:52:18 AM

I can't run the daemon because libstdc++-6.dll is missing, when I download it from the internet I get _ZNSt12out_of_rangeD2Ev could not be located in libstdc++-6.dll.

Is it possible you add the proper version of the dll to the package?

Updated the package with the correct dll and the optimized minerd from pooler (if you want faster you'll have to get his 64 bit version).
Icon fix and some other minor GUI fixes coming soon, a linux binary aswell.

Stokkie

newbie

Activity: 28

Merit: 0

I can't run the daemon because libstdc++-6.dll is missing, when I download it from the internet I get _ZNSt12out_of_rangeD2Ev could not be located in libstdc++-6.dll.

Is it possible you add the proper version of the dll to the package?

Come-from-Beyond

legendary

Activity: 2142

Merit: 1009

Newbie

Quote from: kronosvl on January 18, 2012, 05:05:01 AM

Quote from: Come-from-Beyond on January 18, 2012, 04:53:37 AM

I know. Just imagine that difficulty is 1. Then u need to go thru 65536 hashes. Not 2^32 as u wrote.

how sure are you about this?

also why divide by 0.05 and not multiply?

next quote proves that I'm right

2^32 * 0.05 / 33.000.000 = 6.5

Quote from: coblee on January 18, 2012, 02:52:25 AM

To put it in perspective with Litecoin... Litecoin currently has a difficulty of 1.14442 and the block times are 2.5 minutes. If Liquidcoin gets popular and has as much hashrate as Litecoin right now (33 mhash/s), with a difficulty of 0.05, a block will be found every 6.5 seconds.

If I multiplied I would lower qty of hashes required to find a block. It has no sense.

My link to litecoinpool.org proves that I'm right too

Let's stop offtopic here, this thread is for other purposes.

PS: Difficulty could have different meanings, so 1st thing we should do is to define what difficulty ==1 for this coin is.

bulanula

hero member

Activity: 518

Merit: 500

We need an exchange guys Cheesy

Can't be LiquidCoin without any exchanges right ?

kronosvl

full member

Activity: 134

Merit: 100

Quote from: Come-from-Beyond on January 18, 2012, 04:53:37 AM

I know. Just imagine that difficulty is 1. Then u need to go thru 65536 hashes. Not 2^32 as u wrote.

how sure are you about this?

also why divide by 0.05 and not multiply?

next quote proves that I'm right

2^32 * 0.05 / 33.000.000 = 6.5

Quote from: coblee on January 18, 2012, 02:52:25 AM

To put it in perspective with Litecoin... Litecoin currently has a difficulty of 1.14442 and the block times are 2.5 minutes. If Liquidcoin gets popular and has as much hashrate as Litecoin right now (33 mhash/s), with a difficulty of 0.05, a block will be found every 6.5 seconds.

Nachtwind

hero member

Activity: 700

Merit: 507

I kind of like this new coin... especially since it is the first honest altcoin in a while. It has several things that one needs to point out:

- It knows its place: It doesnt claim supremecy about any other chain
- It is meant to be for speculators. We all knew that for i0, ix etc, but noone ever mentioned that
- Fixed Diffs mean that pools are out of the game, so be it.
- The decrease of payout is also an interestering experiment with every "retarget" is an interestering experiment (something to corporate into virtualminer ^^). Since it makes a subsiedy cut like seen in Solidcoin2 or will see in Bitcoin overfluent..
- THere are no premined coins, everything is open source and as transparent as it is possible - something that is not so common anymore..
- Based on the design of having scrypt and fixed diff pools are more or less overfluent. Of course pooling can occur but with the outcome of "lag" - and why should people pool up? Basically everyone has a realistic chance of finding blocks on solo..

I really watch this one it HAS some potential..

Come-from-Beyond

legendary

Activity: 2142

Merit: 1009

Newbie

I know. Just imagine that difficulty is 1. Then u need to go thru 65536 hashes. Not 2^32 as u wrote.

Topic: [RELEASE] Liquidcoin (Speculation based) - page 6. (Read 29222 times)