Topic: Remain decentralized with crypto or centralized with banks. (Read 352 times)

People need to learn what is centralization and decentralization... In crypto, we all know what is the meaning of these two words, but outside many are clueless! People don't even think about that stuff! They think and argue about the next president, but they never think about who is running the show from behind and who is financing this circus around! Eh... people still think that they will vote for a guy that will save them... what a joke that is!

Bitcoin and crypto started something huge, and I think in these 12 years many people realized there's something more in crypto and the number of people who are in crypto is growing each year! I am sure things will change one day, but who knows when!

I said it a few times and I will say it again... in one moment we will have to choose what we support! And when we choose it will be our future!

I've seen the scenarios of banks going bankrupt, this is a common thing, but the main idea here is to suggest that having our financial assets with a centralized entity is invoking more danger either on a short or long term than the good advantage it could have offers, how will i claim my financial assets when i have no key to them, when i need to seek the authorization of my asset from a third party organizations or corporate body like banks.

Let's take a look into the current situation in India ongoing currently, whereby an exchange wazirx was place on denied access to their account https://news.bitcoin.com/india-freezes-crypto-exchange-wazirxs-bank-assets-binance-claims-acquisition-of-wazirx-was-never-completed/ you can read more on the news but staying decentralized with bitcoin has no ditches of embargo attached,  if not your keys then it's really not your coind as the common slogan says.

It is a bit of a problem that the bank is pretty bad at protecting our privacy or that the storage of our assets won't be safe because we don't keep the key but banks are indispensable in our lives. We still need it, if your business is in trouble no one will be able to lend you bitcoin to overcome the difficulty but the bank can be the place for you to mortgage the property and solve that problem.

I will store my assets in crypto and the bank will still be a tool for us to convert assets to fiat money for the convenience of daily life.

Is now a good time to invest in businesses and services which are not regulated under $10k reporting requirements?

There must still be good ways to move money that they haven't regulated. Which will see volumes rise in coming years.

Could the future of finance and business be defined by those few remaining loopholes being closed one by one.

On a global scale, some nations are tightening financial reporting and taxation. Causing many residents to renounce their citizenship and flee elsewhere.

While other nations are loosening financial reporting and taxation to attract digital nomads and whales into residing within their borders.

Its a curious struggle occurring at the moment. Wonder what the end result will be.

For the many they think it was an added service that we can use together with the existing one's but for the person that creates it I think his goal is to become independent because we can see that each of them have their own unique qualities. One is decentralized and the other is centralized.

Holding btc in a wallet where you hold your own keys are indeed better than storing money in a bank because they have a full control of it but in terms of security cant say if btc is really secure because if yes then why we have so many news in regards to hacks? And I don't think all of those cases are caused by human error though we can lessen these unfortunate events by using a hardware/offline wallet.

wowsie, glad that my savings are locked in a Singaporean bank. Because I am estimating a crash of banks in my country as well or a similar indirect tax from the government(we can call this a kind of tax, right?)  

It sucks how any kind of economic crash is burdened by the proletariats in a capitalist state. While the elites secure their position at the expense of those below them(just like the Titanic sink).
weliveinasociety.jpg

Both unfortunately and/or fortunately, depending on one's view, decentralization with crypto and centralization with banks will have to co-exist together for quite some time into the foreseeable future.  An either/or scenario won't happen in any of our lifetimes.  The key to the co-existence will be making the 2 more mutually inclusive as opposed to mutually exclusive.

I'm even choosing both for now in terms of keeping some existing funds. Because it's true as you say that the Bank can guarantee the safety of everyone's funds who have become their customers so that it makes me save 50% of funds in the Bank and the other 50% in Bitcoin even though there are negative and positive sides to both and that's what I have understand long ago.

Bitcoin is safe from inflation (maybe good for store of value) but users are not completely safe having it in the wallet. There are many risks you can think of including user error leading to the loss of all your assets. While the bank can guarantee the security of your funds even though your financial privacy actually becomes bad. Both have a negative side and a positive side, and we as users can only choose which one is best for us.

Not all crypto is decentralized, many are centralized assets like fiat. But specifically bitcoin, it's true.

The cryptocurrency is an added service to give comfort and trust for the users against the traditional banking system. However the independent usage of bitcoin for now is low as known people accept it. The usage of having a wallet to hold bitcoin and cryptocurrencies is more secure than having our funds in bank, but to make cash in our hands to bitcoin we are in need of bank. This makes decentralised crypto and centralized banks a needed one.

Agreed, there might be hidden agenda that benefit them and do harm on users but when considering some difference then we could see that they are more preferred to commercial banks, especially most of the bitcoiners who cannot do without making use of fiat for their local transactions will still prefer kuda then the government institutional banks, of which the overall solution here is bitcoin, a decentralized network of p2p.


the whole thing is when you have your money with the bank they make deductions in disguise as charged indescriminately, when you perform a transaction as well they take charges, now the complain is that it's too much, they can make 3 to 4 different charges on a single transaction anytime anyhow, the the annoying of it all is called stamp duty, whereby when you receive or make payment from your account they will make charges of about 3 to 4 as said earlier, while banks like kuda will offer you free transaction charges for the first 25th transactions made in a month.


this is preferable because before you made a transaction in bitcoin you would have seen the amount to be charged with, also you can customize your transactions fee and take advantage of the mempool if not busy for lower fees even though it may take a little longer to be confirmed.


Exactly, you got the point, the more we are trying to become independent from banks the more the government are tracking us back to their system we are running away from, that's why you see many haters of bitcoin has the majority attacks coming from government and the banks they influence.


They have their own strategies they use to deceive users to believe in their services at first just to ensure they were under the coverage of their net trap and this is common in most if the financial system now, they appear to be whom they were not, that's why i thought about the topic of this thread to be "Remain decentralized with crypto or centralized with banks".


In cases like this, among thousands pool of banks we can still have few that can work to a certain extent just like in the case of kuda, if one must use a centralized bank then kuda and few ones may be a best available option than others.

Yes, we still need their services and we can't deny that. In my opinion even though bitcoin is better adopted but basically bitcoin is not to replace this fiat system. Bitcoin will also not be a competitor but the advantages it has will be an alternative choice for us.

Its our choice, if holding cryptocurrency isn't illegal in your country then nothing is stopping you from holding all your money in crypto but the volatility nature of the cryptocurrencies itself resisting it from happening. After 2020 we are more relying on digital payment and this is the first step of the evolution then people may realize why we have to pay money to someone to use our money that day is going to become the real adoption of decentralization in the monetary system.

Yep That's how bank works. There will be never a free service especially on banks. There are many banks that offer zero charge on becoming their member but the reality is it will be the gateway for them to charge you fees as you use their service. Fees are scattered between their services and some is charging annual fees. There are couple of banks out there and they are just fighting with each other by providing you an advantage over other banks such as lower fees, 0 membership fee, waived annual fees and other promotions.

We have bitcoin on our side but we can't deny the comfortability that banks gives us on our daily lives. I myself have some money on my bank but it isn't that much since I don't fully trust them, It's just the life would be easier.

That's why I say nothing is free when you deal with a bank. I don't believe it even though they actually free some transactions because in the end there is always a fee that is expected. The bottom line is, if you want to keep a lot of money in the bank then you have to be willing to accept their T&C as a terms of service.

But we will not be able to be 100% decentralized because we are actually adherents of government law. A centralized financial system is always needed, we cannot completely avoid it.

I always laughed when I read those articles because most of them were just pushing an agenda and nothing much. People fail to realized that majoriy of this so called life changing apps has VC backing and the VCs are made up by the government officials and the banking officials in our country. You think an app will just come from nowhere and dominate the banking sectors in an economy like that of Nigeria without the official allowing it to happen. Our banking official knows the citizens will naturally patronize apps that looks like aren't under the control of the government without realizing that before an app can operate as  the Kuda bank app has, they must have the approval from the CBN and complie to their regulations.

I thought people will come to their senses when the Kuda bank app started blocking cryptocurency related transaction or account belongings to public cryptocurency figure but no that wasn't the case instead the publicity of the app grow faster because of the so called free transaction and wasn't overcharging her customer but then this are just disguise. How are they then different from the traditional banks if we get same charges. Slowly they'll be as worst as the regular banks. Their services are only fast now because they don't transact the amount the regular banks does. Banks can never have your best interest at heat, they're only looking for means to enrich themselves and control you through your finances.

There are way more hidden charges than these to be honest, and it varies from banks to banks also from countries to countries. I have credit cards with zero membership charges but still they deduct some money per year or quarters I don't know exactly as subscription fee, they even charge for checks, deposit and using ATM after certain times so there are lot of small money keep deducted by banks all the time which I really hate it but that is not the only reason I want to have decentralized monetary system.

Banks literally printing more money so this keep reducing the purchasing power which isn't really have to be in that way.

I love this topic, this is magnificent. I literally became a crypto obsessed person because of this. Doesn't mean that it's not going to end up working for us, of course it does, but that's still not going to be something that is dangerous to us all to just stay in crypto and prefer that, over the horribleness of banks. Don't get me wrong, I am not even thinking as people who work in Banks are bad people, not even CEO's, maybe individually there could be some bad people who are bankers, but not inheritly.

The problem is how banks work, if there is a bank out there, all of them, every single one from tiny to giants, all work in a way to ruin peoples' lives.

Nothing is free, it is the basis of a centralized financial system. In fact, I can make transactions hundreds of times every month using a local bank (same bank) with no fees but in reality they can still charge a service fee at the end of the month (card fee or admin fee). The government does not want to lose even though it actually uses our money stored in bank accounts. They say revenue sharing but they cut taxes. That's the thing that makes me never put a lot of money in a bank account again, it's totally unfair.

Yes, it is true, governments never care about the comfort of citizens, here in my country the same thing too, I expect that the same thing is in most countries, when they provide you with such free or semi -free services, it is certain that they have other goals greater than that, they may want to track all your transactions Or prevented you from transferring your money into encrypted currencies, for example, the government does not waste any opportunity to impose centralization and control citizens and know all the details of their lives, especially the financial life, so I think this is the goal of creating this type of bank.