Pages:
Author

Topic: Removed. - page 4. (Read 2929 times)

legendary
Activity: 3472
Merit: 4801
January 11, 2015, 02:33:58 AM
#4
If not, is it because you primarily use bitcoins for drugs/porn or other illicit activity?  Or you use it to try to cloak your donations/transactions?

Before I answer your question, answer one for me.

If you could do so without being charged any processing fees, would you be willing to contact your banks, credit card companies, and retirement savings investments to receive an export of your entire spending and savings history from all of you accounts for the past 3 years, and to then post that entire history here in this thread for the entire world to access?
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 500
January 11, 2015, 01:08:39 AM
#3
If the government required all wallets to be publicly registered to a driver license or government ID, would you be OK with that?  Why?  Why not?

No, because I don't have a government ID.
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
January 11, 2015, 01:07:51 AM
#2
Sure, bitcoin transactions are transparent, but it's still pretty difficult to figure the identity of an address/wallet owner.  

If the government required all wallets to be publicly registered to a driver license or government ID, would you be OK with that?  Why?  Why not?

I'm trying to understand what percentage of people use bitcoin because it's relatively anonymous.  

If not, is it because you primarily use bitcoins for drugs/porn or other illicit activity?  Or you use it to try to cloak your donations/transactions?

Look forward to your opinions.  

Thanks.
No, that completely ruins the whole point of Bitcoin.
I would rather use PayPal.
jr. member
Activity: 42
Merit: 3
January 11, 2015, 01:06:34 AM
#1
Removed.
Pages:
Jump to: