Topic: Renowned Oncologist Drops Bombshell: Ivermectin Cures Cancer - page 2. (Read 459 times)

The assumptions are that the CDC leaders are correct when they oppose their own CDC studies. Your choice. Believe the CDC leaders, or believe the CDC reports. Since they are contradictory, you can't do both.

For now these are just assumptions. There was no official case of patient recovery while taking this medicine. What should I do if any hereditary diseases or negative symptoms appear after taking this drug? All these vaccines must be certified! During the COVID-19 epidemic, information also emerged that Ivermectin could fight this disease. But the World Health Organization does not approve the use of this drug.

There is so much evidence that vaccines are detrimental to the health that denial of the fact is becoming a crime. At The Highwire website at Bitchute, there are at least dozens of medical people who are showing us this. Below is another. See the whole video here: https://www.bitchute.com/video/a2scxKSBms24/.


Dr. Paul Thomas' Medical License Taken After His Study Proved UNvaccinated Children Do Not Get S

---

https://www.bitchute.com/video/fp33AZGmRKJe/
Dr. Paul Thomas' Medical License Taken After His Study Proved UNvaccinated Children Do Not Get Sick

His 10 year study showed that disease skyrockets in vaccinated children compared to unvaccinated children

We studied every single baby born to my doctors office over a 10 year period. The results were staggering

Dr.Paul Thomas;
We stratified the children according to how many vaccines they'd received.
The data was clear:-
The more vaccines a child received the worse their health; chronic illness, asthma, ADHD, neurological issues, allergies etc etc
The unvaccinated children did not get sick.

This data is so powerful that within 5 days of this being published online they took my medical license away as I was a threat to public health

Because we insist on informed consent we had a growing number of parents refusing to vaccinate their children based on the evidence of harms...
...

---

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3580766/

Maybe some anti-parasitics have antineoplastic effects.

Not a cure but perhaps a treatment.

^^^ Something like that is to be expected from a joker who wants the Ukraine war to continue so that thousands more die, and so that the US economy fails... at least for the little people. Will you ever stop hiding the good stuff, and stop promoting the bad?

People don't care about side effects. How do we know? Because they take thousands of medical drugs that have worse side effects than Ivermectin could ever think of having. But Ivermectin works. Most of those other drugs only cover up whatever problem a little.

I did not quote him, I am answering the OP dumBAss. So, again, are you trying to get profit from getting people killed? What is next snake oil seller?
You are a parasite of this forum, and a risk to other´s health.



https://www.webmd.com/drugs/2/drug-1122/ivermectin-oral/details

I hadn't realized that methylene blue was so good for people. Methylene blue seems to be one of the best anti-parasitic drugs around. And, it's FDA approved for certain things. And it is used in hospitals around the world.

The website/video listed below are filled with info about methylene blue... loads that include parasite control, but way beyond.

Additionally, loads of good info here https://drjaneruby.com/.


HOW ARE YOU MANAGING YOUR PARASITES?

---

https://banned.video/watch?id=664bfdf0cf811a8b15e33797
Natural Health Series: Everyone has parasites....the type and number are the only differences. Your pets have parasites as so humans. Methylene Blue is a natural anti-parasitic, learn why, also backed up by over 100 years of use and studies for human parasites cleansing. And so much more!
...

---

^^^ Ivermectin isn't the only thing that works. It's just so readily available that anybody can easily get it. Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) works. But it isn't available over the counter (generally). However, what few people know is that the other 'chloroquine' products work almost as well as HCQ, and many are available OTC. And there is Budesonide that works. And, really, there are a lot more. Simple nicotine works. If you want to see a video on nicotine (which isn't habit forming at all; they lied to you), take a look at this https://thedrardisshow.com/episode-04-10-2024-the-other-n-word.

The thing that doesn't work is the vaccines. The proof is from the CDC. While the following site isn't a CDC site, it breaks down what has been going on with VAERS - https://openvaers.com/. If you want to see the numbers in an easy format... https://openvaers.com/covid-data. A million and a half reports for the whole world isn't so bad until you realize that this is less than 1% of what is really happening...https://openvaers.com/faq/what-is-underreporting-and-why-it-matters

The point is that we're only scratching the surface regarding all the lies and deception the governments and the medical have been using on us in the Covid thing.

Out curiosity I took a look at the source of this news and I must say it would seem almost as a webpage written by OP itself, unironically.
There are articles literally saying Covid vaccines destroy the immune systems of those who took the messenger ARN version of the vaccine, to the point of those people being tagged as suffering from VIH in blood tests. Pretty much insanity to even have the audacity to compare taking a vaccine to getting something similar to AIDS.
If that was true, then it would have devolved into a national emergency in the United States, of people getting sick because of opportunistic infections and other deceases, which is not the case. Also, that article does not even mention other kinds of vaccines which were created by other companies in other countries and did not use the method of messenger ARN, instead the used the old method of weakening the COVID for the making of the vaccine itself.

Also, why ivermectin ? There are a lot of other anti-parasitic drugs out there in the market...

Oh, quit picking on TS. He's just a little off his rocker, right now, having been hurt so badly by Trump and all. He probably wanted Stormy for himself, but some Ivermectin cured him, and he's in a frenzy over it.

Are you trying to get people killed?

In case anyone is curious about the origin of pseudoscience conspiritards obsession with ivermectin:
https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2023/03/ivermectin-medical-subculture-covid-pandemic/673467/

And here I thought you were simply a joker with beliefs. Lol. Now we find that you are a censorship nerd.

It fits. Like to make up peoples' minds for them, right? Don't like the idea of freedom, right? Wanna play like you are the one who has the control, right?

Watchya gonna do when they come for you... the men in the white smocks?

Remember to get your friends to check out post #3 so at least they can get healed.

I know which of those types you are. Hint: not polution.

^^^ The thing that we call 'the medical' is a gigantic hodge-podge of people in the research and treatment field. Most of them listen to the CDC and the FDA. Ivermectin, fenbendazole, hydroxychloroquine, and many more have been known about for decades. True info about what these medicines can do, has been crushed by the leading authorities, because their use would prevent enough diseases that Big Pharma wouldn't make any money.

The point is not that info about these parasite drugs is not known. The point is that the info has been quashed and hidden. That's why I talk about Hulda Clark in post #3 above. Get this info out into the open and save lives easily. And get rid of Big Pharma which is screwing the whole world with the lies and deception.

If this Ivernectine, drug has been proven to be a cure for cancer, then that is a very big win for cancer cure which as far as I know has no known cure. I don't think that it'll be difficult to know whether the drug can really cure cancer, as we have many cancer patients, all we need do is wait for many of them to take the Ivernectine, and see if it cures them, or atleast know the percentage of the patients that will receive partial or permanent cure, if it doesn't work on cancer patients, then we'll know that it's a scam.

I think that the medical field should try and verify the authenticity of this Ivernectine, because the price will skyrocket as this information is spreading, so that it doesn't mislead people to think that it's a cure for cancer, if it's not. It could also deprive animals that it's meant for, if the information is not true.

^^^ The point, again, being that Ivermectin cures cancer.

A cancer tumor, even if it is small, is simply the evidence that the cancer has been around for a long - but at least a reasonable - time. The thing to do is catch the cancer before it becomes a tumer, if possible.

Since cancer tumors are NOT made by insects, one can look all day for the insect that made the cancer, and never find it.

If you look at post #3 in this thread, you will find the info location that explains about the two things that cause disease... including cancer. The are parasites and pollution. Probably not all anti-parasitic drugs will kill cancer. Two that do are Ivermectin and Fenbendazole.

There really are many more. Even MMS properly administered will kill cancer without harming the person. The fact that the FDA talks against MMS is strong evidence that it works. But Dupont sells it by the train car load to other countries. And there is all kinds of medical research going on regarding it.

The point is that cancer acts the same way that a parasite disease acts... and responds to parasite medicine treatment.

The point about the doctor in this article is, she only had a few cures. This is not enough to be able to make a solid claim one way or another. However, Dr. Hulda Clark in post #3 cured loads of people by killing off the parasites, even if she didn't use Ivermectin. Or did she use it?

I have found some scientific articles on the internet which suggest some mechanisms in which Ivermectin could have some anti cancerous properties, but it does not have anything to do with parasites or microscopic insects which cause tumors within the body of the patients.
Actually, if tumors were made by insects they would have been found already by the use of a simple microscope, not even an optical one but also an electronic one.

Also, i tried to cross examine this "news" and I could not find much on this person, just found a very shady reference on this alleged doctor talking about ivermectin and cancer, but nothing from recognized webpages.
This is probably some very well planned censorship being carried out by the deep state, so people won't go to their local pet stores and start to stockpile ivermectin as fast as possible in their homes, driving the price of the drug to new and previously unseen levels. 
The losers will be the poor home cats and dogs which won't get affordable drugs anymore to deal with worms.

Hulda Clark's decades-long research brought her to a simplified conclusion: all human disease comes from only two causes: Parasites and Pollution.

https://www.huldaclark.com/

I know ivermectin as a drug that cures for skin and worms infestation on animals, but I've never come across the use of such in curing cancer, cancer is nothing but a multiplication of a particular cell in human body, which everyone is well aware that such has no cure, the quickest remedy many adopt is the removal of the affected part and that's all, we can be hearing of different trials by errors people are posting on the media about cancer and it cure, but none seem effective as many are dying daily as a result of cancer.