Pages:
Author

Topic: Replace-By-Fee: A Counter Argument - page 2. (Read 2649 times)

sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
Young but I'm not that bold
January 06, 2016, 06:45:24 PM
#2
I do not think we need to deal with 0 confirmation transactions. waiting for 10 or 20 minutes for the first confirmation is not a big deal for me

Replace-By-Fee can really help to cancel any transaction was sent by mistake. I will consider it as a few minutes charge back service
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1116
January 06, 2016, 06:30:12 PM
#1
Just no. Angry

https://medium.com/@octskyward/replace-by-fee-43edd9a1dd6d#.asn8rqiex

Repeating past statements, it is acknowledged that Peter’s scorched
earth replace-by-fee proposal is aptly named, and would be widely
anti-social on the current network
—Jeff Garzik
 
RBF is irrational and harmful to Bitcoin.
 — Charlie Lee, engineering manager at Coinbase

Replace-by-fee is a bad idea.
 — Gavin Andresen

I agree with Mike & Jeff. Blowing up 0-confirm transactions is vandalism.
— Adam Back (a founder of Blockstream)
Pages:
Jump to: