Topic: Required Minimum Post of a Signature Campaign should not allow too! - page 2. (Read 1036 times)
July 28, 2017, 11:11:58 AM
I, for one agrees to this. However, services create their own campaign to advertise their brand around the forum. Having a minimum post might be the most economical way for them to sell their name, but at the expense of post quality in this forum. Why not only allow campaigns with a pay/post rule rather than a fixed/week? The latter seems to attract more careless, spammy posts over the former. Also, the blacklist of members for signature campaigns would also be a great help to somehow reduce the spam here.
July 28, 2017, 10:35:34 AM
As we've discussed here https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.20448891
Banning or not allowing campign manager to make a minimum post every week will help lessening signature spammers.
Thoughts?
Banning or not allowing campign manager to make a minimum post every week will help lessening signature spammers.
Thoughts?
The FortuneJack campaign involving their 25 posts in the Gambling section is definitely an incentive to spam. In the campaign (highest-paying, IIRC) one is pretty much forced to spam because it's nearly impossible to actually sustain a full 25 posts in that cesspool unless you're a thread-starter or in some deep discussion.
You'll get shit like this with minimum post requirements:
An interesting site seems to me, for visiting. Is this some kind of poker game? i don't really understand the game on this site. It seems like I have to make sure to come to this site and play. Cool site, hopefully more visitors who come to playing here. I will telling too to my friend who like playing a poker game to coming at this site.
If you limit it to a maximum, then you'll see what happens: most actually just go up to that point and stop posting (given that they no longer get money for their contributions so there's no motivation; this works out for the best though). I for one joined my campaign because there was only a minimum post of 1 and since I couldn't be arsed to post a lot consistently this worked out great for me.
On the stance, I suppose that campaigns with high minimum posts/week should be eliminated. I think 10/week in all boards is fair.
(Advocating for keeping minimum posts: they ensure that the advertiser is allowed a somewhat consistent way to track their views. If the posting fluctuates then it's unclear whether the advertising is failing, the website is failing, or if it's just simply a lack of posts)
July 28, 2017, 10:29:47 AM
As we've discussed here https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.20448891
Banning or not allowing campign manager to make a minimum post every week will help lessening signature spammers.
Thoughts?
Banning or not allowing campign manager to make a minimum post every week will help lessening signature spammers.
Thoughts?
Jump to: