Pages:
Author

Topic: Review for bitcoin.org FAQ - page 2. (Read 4902 times)

sr. member
Activity: 285
Merit: 250
Bitcoin.org maintainer
August 24, 2013, 09:14:23 AM
#5
Quite nice. I've got a suggestion for "I'd like to learn more. Where can I get help?" through - when people want to get help, they probably don't want to go through a couple of resources. I suggest linking to #bitcoin's freenode webchat and bitcoin.stackexchange directly.

Perhaps integrating the Freenode webchat there could make sense. Though what I appreciated with the idea of linking the community and resources pages, since these pages are aimed to show different communities and websites based on the language of the user reading the FAQ in the future. Also, it gives users more than just one choice in case they don't like IRC for example and prefer live meetups, or then again, if they don't get a satisfying answer on IRC they can try elsewhere.
sr. member
Activity: 285
Merit: 250
Bitcoin.org maintainer
August 24, 2013, 09:11:14 AM
#4
A very thorough update.  Thank you.  Will review properly in the coming days.

Cheers

ANX.HK


Thanks!
vip
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1043
👻
August 23, 2013, 11:17:21 PM
#3
Quite nice. I've got a suggestion for "I'd like to learn more. Where can I get help?" through - when people want to get help, they probably don't want to go through a couple of resources. I suggest linking to #bitcoin's freenode webchat and bitcoin.stackexchange directly.
newbie
Activity: 36
Merit: 0
August 23, 2013, 11:01:57 PM
#2
A very thorough update.  Thank you.  Will review properly in the coming days.

Cheers

ANX.HK

sr. member
Activity: 285
Merit: 250
Bitcoin.org maintainer
August 23, 2013, 10:32:02 PM
#1
I have just completed a second draft for a FAQ on bitcoin.org.
The result can be previewed live here : ----
Edit : After weeks of review, the FAQ is live: http://bitcoin.org/en/faq. Thanks everyone!

More reviews will be useful. If you wish to, please leave a comment and concrete suggestions of improvement if you find:

- More or less accurate or ambiguous assertions.
- Texts that you think are unrelevant.
- Sentences that are poorly written or typos.
- Missing important informations.

--

The goal for this FAQ is to remain an accessible, objective and concise informative resource with a special interest about recurring myths and concerns.

Once completed and published, it will also be possible to translate this FAQ just like the rest of the website, allowing us to potentially have a good international FAQ.

Thanks in advance
Pages:
Jump to: