Congratulations to those that have bought the guide, the selling of this guide is now closed, however every transactions initiated will be completed successfully.
As I claimed some people normally pretend to be a saint but ...........................
I hereby appeal to the good people of this forum to assist me in asking TBZ, Bitus and Roughlyfe to remove their negative trust placed on my account because I did not collect anything from them neither is there any transactions between us.
Thank you all.
Topic: (REVIEWED BY TBZ) MAKE $50 DAILY EASILY ESCROW IS ACCEPTED. (Read 3048 times)
(REVIEWED BY MOD) MAKE $50 DAILY EASILY ESCROW IS ACCEPTED.
What mod is that?
Can you tell me what you mean by that? Advertising something as endorsed by someone else when they haven't done anything of the sort isn't exactly trustworthy behavior is it?
I am not a dubious person, I only make use of the available opportunity.
I am editing the topic right away.
global moderator
Activity: 3990
Merit: 2717
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
(REVIEWED BY MOD) MAKE $50 DAILY EASILY ESCROW IS ACCEPTED.
What mod is that?
Can you tell me what you mean by that? Advertising something as endorsed by someone else when they haven't done anything of the sort isn't exactly trustworthy behavior is it?
I will not be surprised if TBZ is already doing it now.
TBZ gives me negative trust because he is also selling something
^
When all else fails, libel.
What I'm selling: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/thebutterzone-60600
The highlighted parts indicate plausible deniability so it means that with a good lawyer it's legal, with a bad lawyer it's illegal.
Nope, actually implausible deniability. Let me try to reword it more clearly for morons, but it's rather difficult for me to get down to their level:
If meadefreling is actually doing what they said in their guide, the government, which prosecutes over victimless crimes more than actual crimes with victims like credit/debit card fraud, etc., may choose to prosecute meadefreling not because it feels in any way morally/ethically/legally obligated to, but because it decided to take a break from fucking the civil liberties of victimless aka non-actual criminals, into oblivion.
When you are quoted in an indictment/information actually or effectively saying that you were almost certain that what you were doing was criminal, that establishes probable cause.
If you or your lawyer actually or effectively says to a judge/jury that you were almost certain that what you were doing was criminal, that eliminates reasonable doubt. If you or your lawyer try to claim you actually thought otherwise, your previous inconsistent statement will be used for impeachment.
Living at the expense of victims of crime is offensive and indefensible. You initially called it a "greyhat money making method" in your vouch copy PM to me. Then you changed the OP to
BLACKHAT MONEY MAKING METHOD
Now you're doubling down and trying to pull the Robin Hood card? Fuck you and fuck everyone who thinks it's OK to victimize other poor people and pretend they're rich so it's fine.
Will you consider removing your negative trust if he stops selling this?
I don't think it's correct to leave negative trust for something you received for free as a vouch copy.
Your opinion is already posted for everyone to see and take their own conclusions.
If it's not ok to sell what he's selling according to the the forum rules it's time for the mod to step in and remove the thread.
Just my 2 cents...
I did not collect anything from anybody and I offer escrow option, I think It is high time the forum staff start reviewing this trust ratings before it is made public.
As you said if not appropriate the staff should move it or remove it.
Will you consider removing your negative trust if he stops selling this?
I don't think it's correct to leave negative trust for something you received for free as a vouch copy.
I don't think it's correct to leave negative trust for something you received for free as a vouch copy.
What other free victimful crime guides would you say are incorrect to leave negative trust for? Burglary? Armed robbery? Kidnapping? Rape? Murder?
Quote
Your opinion is already posted for everyone to see and take their own conclusions.
Some have concluded that committing victimful crimes is awesome, others haven't even read my amateur indictment.
Quote
If it's not ok to sell what he's selling according to the the forum rules it's time for the mod to step in and remove the thread.
Finally something reasonable. Yes, they should move it to the hidden forum where it can only be seen by staff and obtained by legal process.
The highlighted parts indicate plausible deniability so it means that with a good lawyer it's legal, with a bad lawyer it's illegal.
Nope, actually implausible deniability. Let me try to reword it more clearly for morons, but it's rather difficult for me to get down to their level:
If meadefreling is actually doing what they said in their guide, the government, which prosecutes over victimless crimes more than actual crimes with victims like credit/debit card fraud, etc., may choose to prosecute meadefreling not because it feels in any way morally/ethically/legally obligated to, but because it decided to take a break from fucking the civil liberties of victimless aka non-actual criminals, into oblivion.
When you are quoted in an indictment/information actually or effectively saying that you were almost certain that what you were doing was criminal, that establishes probable cause.
If you or your lawyer actually or effectively says to a judge/jury that you were almost certain that what you were doing was criminal, that eliminates reasonable doubt. If you or your lawyer try to claim you actually thought otherwise, your previous inconsistent statement will be used for impeachment.
Living at the expense of victims of crime is offensive and indefensible. You initially called it a "greyhat money making method" in your vouch copy PM to me. Then you changed the OP to
BLACKHAT MONEY MAKING METHOD
Now you're doubling down and trying to pull the Robin Hood card? Fuck you and fuck everyone who thinks it's OK to victimize other poor people and pretend they're rich so it's fine.
Will you consider removing your negative trust if he stops selling this?
I don't think it's correct to leave negative trust for something you received for free as a vouch copy.
Your opinion is already posted for everyone to see and take their own conclusions.
If it's not ok to sell what he's selling according to the the forum rules it's time for the mod to step in and remove the thread.
Just my 2 cents...
What I am promoting is just a method to monetize what everybody is selling in this forum and every other big forums, if you can not call the sellers criminals then YOU MUST BE A BIG FOOL TO CALL ME A criminal.
I don't initiate trades unless I reasonably believe them to be legal and intend to finish them, and I don't have an alt account for undercover work.
meadefreling, you're welcome and perfectly positioned to gather evidence of credit/debit card fraud, etc. by your fellow criminals and their associates and leave negative trust on them!
I wonder how foolish some people can be, I checked my trust rating I found some review that are naturally not suppose to be my own but it was giving my the extremist that expects everything to be giving to them for free.
What I am promoting is just a method to monetize what everybody is selling in this forum and every other big forums, if you can not call the sellers criminals then YOU MUST BE A BIG FOOL TO CALL ME A criminal.
What I am promoting is just a method to monetize what everybody is selling in this forum and every other big forums, if you can not call the sellers criminals then YOU MUST BE A BIG FOOL TO CALL ME A criminal.
(REVIEWED BY MOD) MAKE $50 DAILY EASILY ESCROW IS ACCEPTED.
What mod is that?
lol,, ofcourse moderator
i beg , if u bought this u all will confuse
and btw BLACKHAT MONEY MAKING METHOD Black Hat is community hacker its illegal ,
Check Pm. I don't think its any harm to give it a shot if escrow is used.
Perhaps you are the only one who can think without any sentiments, they keep on saying all sorts of things because one of the simplest money making method have been released and a vouch cop was giving to someone that is not suppose to be biases but instead TBZ keep on bumping my thread MUST people continue to struggle while there is a simple method that can easily earn them $50 daily?I will not be surprised if TBZ is already doing it now.
Please check your PM.
Check Pm. I don't think its any harm to give it a shot if escrow is used.
Op is just a criminal and he wants to envolve right ppl.
Listen, poor bastard go and keep doing what u are doing and stop fucking selling your criminal guide here.
U will end bad and you know It.
Ppl makes their living without fucking the rest of poor ppl.
But i think u are the poor man who needs illegal things to live...
Butterzone you should report what he is doing.
Im police so please report to him and lets catch this criminal.
Listen, poor bastard go and keep doing what u are doing and stop fucking selling your criminal guide here.
U will end bad and you know It.
Ppl makes their living without fucking the rest of poor ppl.
But i think u are the poor man who needs illegal things to live...
Butterzone you should report what he is doing.
Im police so please report to him and lets catch this criminal.
What moderator is that ? TheButterZone isn't a moderator and as far as I know when I asked hilariousandco , seems like he denied and didn't want to do it and he posted on this thread :/
Also who are the buyers please ? Original post says three 10 people to buy and on your last post you are saying 3 copies left so there must be 7 buyers already
Also who are the buyers please ? Original post says three 10 people to buy and on your last post you are saying 3 copies left so there must be 7 buyers already
I beginning to feel that TheButterZone have a personal interest in this thread after his brutal review, is like I am leaking out some secrets that he did not like but as admin he should just tell me not to expose the millionaire secrets rather than attacking me up and down, he have done his review and he should let the matter rest and allow people to decide.
The only reason why he's still on this thread is because other people are misunderstanding his vouch.
Example:
The highlighted parts indicate plausible deniability so it means that with a good lawyer it's legal, with a bad lawyer it's illegal.
I'd buy if I had the funds to spare.
I'd buy if I had the funds to spare.
It's also because you continued to be stubborn in your stupidity and continued to say that your method wasn't actually illegal without any proof here:
THANK YOU FOR YOUR HONEST REVIEW, YOU ACTUALLY SAID IT RIGHT BUT IT IS NOT ILLEGAL, THE ITEM CAN BE BOUGHT AND SOLD THESAME HOUR ONLINE AND THE MONEY CAN CERTAINLY BE EARNED.
..and TBZ wants to make buyers know exactly what their getting.
Only three more copies to be sold before I lock this thread and stop selling this.
Rush hour order will not be entertained, THIS THREAD WILL BE LOCKED IN IN NEXT 24 HOURS.
Rush hour order will not be entertained, THIS THREAD WILL BE LOCKED IN IN NEXT 24 HOURS.
Also, nice try. You know that TBZ practically demolished your chance at getting a quick $50 so you're just wrapping this up here. No one feels hurried to buy your copies.
global moderator
Activity: 3990
Merit: 2717
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
(REVIEWED BY MOD) MAKE $50 DAILY EASILY ESCROW IS ACCEPTED.
What mod is that?
Only three more copies to be sold before I lock this thread and stop selling this.
Rush hour order will not be entertained, THIS THREAD WILL BE LOCKED IN IN NEXT 24 HOURS.
Rush hour order will not be entertained, THIS THREAD WILL BE LOCKED IN IN NEXT 24 HOURS.
The highlighted parts indicate plausible deniability so it means that with a good lawyer it's legal, with a bad lawyer it's illegal.
Nope, actually implausible deniability. Let me try to reword it more clearly for morons, but it's rather difficult for me to get down to their level:
If meadefreling is actually doing what they said in their guide, the government, which prosecutes over victimless crimes more than actual crimes with victims like credit/debit card fraud, etc., may choose to prosecute meadefreling not because it feels in any way morally/ethically/legally obligated to, but because it decided to take a break from fucking the civil liberties of victimless aka non-actual criminals, into oblivion.
When you are quoted in an indictment/information actually or effectively saying that you were almost certain that what you were doing was criminal, that establishes probable cause.
If you or your lawyer actually or effectively says to a judge/jury that you were almost certain that what you were doing was criminal, that eliminates reasonable doubt. If you or your lawyer try to claim you actually thought otherwise, your previous inconsistent statement will be used for impeachment.
Living at the expense of victims of crime is offensive and indefensible. You initially called it a "greyhat money making method" in your vouch copy PM to me. Then you changed the OP to
BLACKHAT MONEY MAKING METHOD
Now you're doubling down and trying to pull the Robin Hood card? Fuck you and fuck everyone who thinks it's OK to victimize other poor people and pretend they're rich so it's fine.
The highlighted parts indicate plausible deniability so it means that with a good lawyer it's legal, with a bad lawyer it's illegal.
Nope, actually implausible deniability. Let me try to reword it more clearly for morons, but it's rather difficult for me to get down to their level:
If meadefreling is actually doing what they said in their guide, the government, which prosecutes over victimless crimes more than actual crimes with victims like credit/debit card fraud, etc., may choose to prosecute meadefreling not because it feels in any way morally/ethically/legally obligated to, but because it decided to take a break from fucking the civil liberties of victimless aka non-actual criminals, into oblivion.
When you are quoted in an indictment/information actually or effectively saying that you were almost certain that what you were doing was criminal, that establishes probable cause.
If you or your lawyer actually or effectively says to a judge/jury that you were almost certain that what you were doing was criminal, that eliminates reasonable doubt. If you or your lawyer try to claim you actually thought otherwise, your previous inconsistent statement will be used for impeachment.
Living at the expense of victims of crime is offensive and indefensible. You initially called it a "greyhat money making method" in your vouch copy PM to me. Then you changed the OP to
BLACKHAT MONEY MAKING METHOD
Now you're doubling down and trying to pull the Robin Hood card? Fuck you and fuck everyone who thinks it's OK to victimize other poor people and pretend they're rich so it's fine.
The highlighted parts indicate plausible deniability so it means that with a good lawyer it's legal, with a bad lawyer it's illegal.
Nope, actually implausible deniability. Let me try to reword it more clearly for morons, but it's rather difficult for me to get down to their level:
If meadefreling is actually doing what they said in their guide, the government, which prosecutes over victimless crimes more than actual crimes with victims like credit/debit card fraud, etc., may choose to prosecute meadefreling not because it feels in any way morally/ethically/legally obligated to, but because it decided to take a break from fucking the civil liberties of victimless aka non-actual criminals, into oblivion.
When you are quoted in an indictment/information actually or effectively saying that you were almost certain that what you were doing was criminal, that establishes probable cause.
If you or your lawyer actually or effectively says to a judge/jury that you were almost certain that what you were doing was criminal, that eliminates reasonable doubt. If you or your lawyer try to claim you actually thought otherwise, your previous inconsistent statement will be used for impeachment.
Jump to: