That's capitalization.
In order for there to be progress, there always has to be people at the top of the pyramid. You can't have everyone on an equal playing field otherwise nothing will ever get done.
Although I don't agree it should be to the degree it currently is, there needs to be a significant wealth gap between the industry movers and pioneers, and the labor type staff that build their vision. If there wasn't, why would anybody take on the burden that comes with leading an industry?
Nonetheless, I do think these people bear a strong responsibility to help make things easier for the bottom 4.6 billion, after all, some are barely surviving, and that's not right.
That is exactly the sort of thing capitalists and super wealthy wants you to think. There is so much money in the world right now that, we could both have people who live comfortably, like having fully paid healthcare, free education, cheap but good quality food, goes to movies, eats out anytime they want, have vacations every 6 months, etc etc basically a decent life even if not the yacths and skyscrapers and bentleys etc, just a cool life that doesn't worry about money and bankruptcy but not CEO level.
At the same time we could also have billionaires and super wealthy as well, literally at the same time. How? We are talking about the whole world and all the companies that made 1+ billion dollars in profit, if those companies paid just 10% more in taxes as a whole to just make sure everyone lived better, do you realize how much better everyone would be?
If the money from the top is going to be 20 billion profits whereas the poorest are homeless, do you know how many homeless people you can help with billions in taxes that would just make sure those companies just have few hundred million dollars less versus all the billions of dollars they made?
Hell places like Amazon are making 20+ billion dollars in profits, worth 1 trillion dollars, owner is richest person in the world and they paid literally ZERO federal taxes whereas there are literally THOUSANDS of amazon warehouse workers on welfare. That is a gap that can't be sustained, its dangerous to the world and actually dangerous to the rich as well because as long as they keep agitating the poor like this, eventually the response will be even harsher.
Offering people a better wage, a better working conditions and fairer hours would literally cost them few billion at most, why would it matter if their profits of one year is not 20 but 15 if it means all of their employees are well taken care of? Shouldn't the lives of tens of thousands of amazon workers matter more than how much more profit can the company make? Is shareholders more valuable to world than employees?