Criticism/questioning. Nothing wrong here.
He did *overdo* it here.
This is still acceptable.
This does not fit the criteria.
If a user does not post picture proof with receipts, it is carded? Terrible logic.
That is normally how it goes regarding amazon cards, at least from what I've seen. If users are offering extremely high discounts, then the likelihood of them being acquired via illicit means grows exponentially. Wanting to verify the source if one is interested in buying is entirelly normal. I left you a negative trust because you are delusional, you thought I was inactive since 2015, when I have had PM's as recent as earlier this year. Your assumptions earned you the negative trust.
Have you signed a message with an old Bitcoin address by any chance? That would put that question to rest.This thread is the main reason I left it. I told you, a few weeks without any assumptions and you will get it removed. The more you prove to me I am right, the less I will be inclined to remove it. Your assumption of me being another user furthers my proof.
I am not exactly convinced that this rating is appropriate, but I am not fully opposed to it either. I'd like someone else to comment regarding this. However, the OPs accusation is nonsense as it does not contain any proof of said accusations.It's fucking cunts like you that deserve red trust
This does not make you look good, nor does it help with anything.This could have been avoided.
