Topic: Roger Ver and Bitcoin.com do a social attacks to Bitcoin - page 2. (Read 474 times)

There is one which was filed against him and bitcoin.com for luring unbenounced people new in bitcoin saying it is the one and true bitcoin and they believed him and his sites proproganda.

Firstly your pic is on point
And secondly why is this guy allowed to do so? Isn't the name of Bitcoins itself monetized?
Cannot we just sue him ?
He is just trying to attack Bitcoins because he have now transferred all his funds in Bitcoins cash and now he is at a loss since the value is not increasing.
Can someone please find a way to counteract this?

(  🔫 Let's take him to a country where accidental shooting is common)

In addition to satoshi, what I admire most is Roger ver, for the simple reason that satoshi created BTC, but Roger ver is the promoter of BTC.

meh, they are just pumping their coin! they know they can never destroy bitcoin or inflict any damage that lasts long term. these are just drama in the social media and while everyone is busy arguing about it, they are making a lot of money from their pump.
don't forget that Roger Ver may have created BCH but he is still one of the biggest bitcoin holders of our time

He is just a criminal scum as he always was.

He was pro bitcoin when he was benefiting from it. After he became rich and asked for more (he wanted to become thee bitcoin, as there was nothing more to give), bitcoin couldn't give it to him (devs didnt do what he asked naturally since he is retarded) so he decided to create his own coin.

He knows his coin has no value in a world where bitcoin and litecoin exist and that's why he is aiming to destroy the real one with the hopes of becoming the real one.

so many narrow minded people.. cant see beyond their brown nose

look at the big picture
here is the arguement
"OMG team 2 wants to use the brand bitcoin.. lets report/ban/lawsuit  them so we hand the brand to team one"
cant you even see the reverse psychology of the propaganda finger pointing..

you fools are playing right into the hands of centralising bitcoin into one team.

look beyond the which team should own bitcoin. and remember NO TEAM should own bitcoin.

bitcoin should have NO central point
bitcoin should have Nothing to be attacked because there is no single point

but by you defending core and declaring core the central point, by saying core should own bitcoin you are not keeping the community decentralised.

the reality is. if your storing a blockchain that goes all the way back to satoshi's genesis block of 2009 everyone is bitcoin.
 
now accept no single team owns the brand because no team should. thats what decentralisation is
so there exists bitcoin cash
so there exists bitcoin core

future conversations will be like
we accept dollars... "is that US or canadian"
we accept bitcoin.. "is that core or cash"

the US wont sue australia to make australia stop using "dollar"
the US wont sue canada to make canada stop using "dollar"

think with a rational decentralised mindset. stop thinking about protecting the core team

I called Roger Ver as a opportunist after copying the bitcoin he want to destroy it by making FUD but it will no happen it because immitation will no longer better to original Fake remain fake. Roger need to work out what the use case of bitcoin cash rather than make FUD Bitcoin for the sake of his own coin.

#Taklimakan

What we should start considering now is a class action lawsuit. More and more poor newbies are lossing their hard earned money by buying BCash, as misguided by Roger Ver, when the poor newbies think they just got their first Bitcoins. This is simply insane.

Granted, people should do their homework before buying, but let's try to empathize for once and you'll see how it's normal that if you see Bitcoin.com, twitter.com/Bitcoin and other websites telling you to buy, you may buy and when you realize it's an altcoin it will be too late, we could avoid this by reporting the twitter account as I suggested here.

If Roger is putting out misleading documents he should be removed by the system and i do not think that will happen and since he is active in social media news there is no surprise as there is a rivalry between them for a very long time and sure the remarks made by Roger are misleading and they are planning to grow farther.

there will always be a bitcoin antichrist, as its a trial to compete over market attention with bitcoin, they will however collapse as soon as the us dollar becomes unsecure in value.

Roger Ver is now the bitcoin Antichrist and he would only do like that always.Definitely most of newbies would get confused on seeing such descriptions that Bitcoincash is true bitcoin and bitcoin is only bitcoincore.Some may even end up in buying BCH thinking that they are buying the most revolutionary bitcoin and that they had become the owners of bitcoin from then.If they do a little bit more search,then they might be saved.

Dont mind that douche,he will just stop using it if he got tired of waiting for nothing we shouldnt be supporting this man as he has evil plans to cryptocurrecy market using his BCash,i couldnt imagine how this person keep making it up to himself,he isnt going to do anything good in our market because he only wants to have this businesses.

you can all get used to this garbage, the issue is clear, creating a new bitcoin is very profitable much more profitable than actually to create goods and services for it or shall i rather say easy,

there will be neverending propagandistic attacks till the entire industry looses all its trust and dissolves.

there were historical examples of this than ended in large scale genocides, but i am not going to tell about an example.

currently we are beeing ruled by the fixation of coinmarketcap, the established blog media. the overregulated financial systemmakes it impossible to get a banking license and all would love to have one. as money is power btw.

regards

Roger ver is doing that from the start or the first day of BCash in the market that is why it isnt something new to the people there.His aim is to surpass bitcoin's value so that he can easily manipulate the whole market as we all know bitcoin wont be destroyed or stolen,which is why it wont be dethrone by any altcoins as it is the main trading pair of each coins.

He shouldnt be trusted as he wants to over rule the whole cryptocommunity using his shitcoin,he claims it all the time that his bcash is the real and only bitcoin what a jerk,his cash wont be created without the original code of bitcoin which satoshi has created.Claiming to be the original is bullsh*t as you can see his bcash has only faster tx confirmations and bigger blocksize.

Is the chart a correlation of Bitcoin cashes down price alone or Bitcoin as well? Isn't Bitcoin cash extremely reliant on Bitcoins value like most Altcoins.

bitcoin knots is just a sheep node. made by a core member to pretend that there are other choices. but all knots offers is GUI changes, but will never be used as a decentralised choice of a consensus rule chance(upgrade) to oppose core.

core control the rules.

as for the brand name bitcoin.
NO ONE owns the brand name.. thats the whole point of decentralisation. so pretending that bitcoin core should own the brand name is like america arguing that australia should never say that australians use the dollar.. like america saying that canadians should never use the dollar. and that the only real dollar is the american dollar and all other dollars are fake and not to be trusted.

"dollar" is not owned by any country
"bitcoin" is not owned by any team

some argue this
(a)             _________   1
__________/_________   2

some argue this
(b)
____________________  1
               \__________  2

reality is this
(c)
                __________ 1
_________/
              \___________ 2

silly sheeppeople that want to defend a central team are fighting A and B
1 'we are the bitcoin
2 no we are the bitcoin

the reality is everyone is bitcoin. now accept no single team owns the brand because no team should. thats what decentralisation is
so 1 your bitcoin cash
so 2 your bitcoin core

future conversations will be like
we accept dollars... "is that US or canadian"
we accept bitcoin.. "is that core or cash"

america does not solely own the dollar
core does not solely own bitcoin

now get on with your lives

I don't really care if someone is pro Bitcoin Cash and claims it's better than Bitcoin. Bitcoin Cash may have it's uses it's the fact that there's clear manipulation and misdirection going on here.

Interesting. I don't really normally take notice of Roger Ver and his manipulation techniques, but it's interesting to see a graph which highlights that when it's a down trend of Bitcoin cash he makes public claims I assume that Bitcoin cash is Bitcoin. Although, I'm assuming that this misdirection over at his website is a new addition into his propaganda.

He's really trying to push his shit coin and make himself an outrageous amount of money.

My bet is that at some point someone with a lot of BTC is going to sell the lot to buy BCH and try and invert the pricing. At that point, I'm going to sell lots of my BCH - but not all, just in case they succeed.

How much would it take - a few tens of thousands of Bitcoins a day? There are a fair number of people around with wallets that size.