Topic: Roger Ver's Bitcoin.com propaganda against bitcoin - page 4. (Read 11318 times)
I only use bitcoin cash in an exchange that is sympathetic to BCH where they charge zero fee as transaction fee, I move to other better exchanges that charges low on bitcoin withdrwal, convert to bitcoin and withdraw. In most escrow group I belong to, we buy/sell 85% bitcoin and 2% ethereum. Ethereum because of using it for DEX trading platforms.
How many page views does his shit website get every day? I am sure that it is much lower than that of the Bitcoin article in Wikipedia. That said, we need to take care of all this propaganda being unleashed by the proponents of BCH/BSV. Because I have personally met users who have been fooled by it. Taking control of the Bitcoin.com domain must be done on a priority basis.
The man has spoken. I believe that ends franky1's debate on the topic.
....
split from the main chain, and made a new network that's separate from the old one.
....
split from the main chain, and made a new network that's separate from the old one.
go check the blockchain data and then check the code wrote by luke JR
what you will notice is that bch didnt even exist for hours AFTER core done their controversial fork. thus bch was not the cause but the reaction to an earlier cause.
blockchain timestamps dont lie
After all the lies, and misinformation you posted, no one believes you. Produce your own proof, or get out. Show us the code you claim, and let's show it to Luke-Jr. It will be a learning experience for everyone reading the topic. Or a memefying one.
if you cant find th bitcoin blockchain data. if you cant find luke Jr's mandatory code for august 1st
if you cant see that v0x20000002 activated hours BEFORE cash even made a block...
then thats your problem
but hey all you care about is social drama and memes... maybe best you spend some time learning code, learning stats if you really wanna get involved in any serious conversations
The man has spoken. I believe that ends franky1's debate on the topic.
....
split from the main chain, and made a new network that's separate from the old one.
....
split from the main chain, and made a new network that's separate from the old one.
go check the blockchain data and then check the code wrote by luke JR
what you will notice is that bch didnt even exist for hours AFTER core done their controversial fork. thus bch was not the cause but the reaction to an earlier cause.
blockchain timestamps dont lie
After all the lies, and misinformation you posted, no one believes you. Produce your own proof, or get out. Show us the code you claim, and let's show it to Luke-Jr. It will be a learning experience for everyone reading the topic. Or a memefying one.
i never even used a BCH wallet, nor have i deposited any bch into an exchange. because i dont care about it
the stupid thing is that you think because i dont kiss core devs ass that you think it means im a bch guy.
no im a bitcoin NETWORK guy that cares about code and features not the devs.
there is no point kissing a devs ass, no point defending a dev.
they are temporary entities and their loyalty follows the VC money they earned and now have to stifle bitcoin just to create alternate networks like LN as a means of VC' s to make ROI on the investment.
if you only care about kissing a dev. then maybe its you that should sell ur coins
the stupid thing is that you think because i dont kiss core devs ass that you think it means im a bch guy.
no im a bitcoin NETWORK guy that cares about code and features not the devs.
there is no point kissing a devs ass, no point defending a dev.
they are temporary entities and their loyalty follows the VC money they earned and now have to stifle bitcoin just to create alternate networks like LN as a means of VC' s to make ROI on the investment.
if you only care about kissing a dev. then maybe its you that should sell ur coins
This has a zero tech base and is pure bullshits.
If you want someone to take serious start to act as logical person.
If you want someone to take serious start to act as logical person.
read the blockchain data. check out the blockheights and time stamps. check out luke jr's code.
but naw. you dont think thats "techy" do you?
instead you think quoting human social drama is "techy"
(facepalm)
luke JR wanted a soft fork with his november 2016 release hoping for a christmas 2016 activation.
but even by spring 2017 it sat at only 35% flag...
so luke went on his mandatory controversial fork attempt which he mislead by pretending it was a softfork.
gmax happily calls it a bilateral split. and theres enough quotes on this forum that shows gmax loves thee buzzword 'bilateral'
but the funny part. luke wants to deny anything happened on august 1st.. truly funny.
lol
you dont even know the difference from soft - hard fork, You say bcash is Bitcoin when this altcoin already forked three times in a row. But i think you already know. I cant believe that a guy like you is so blind.
the answer for your case is very simple.
You have fall to Ver scam, you have sell all of your bitcoin, invest in a shitcoin without any future and you are in a limbo and with the only choice to promote a coin with zero future.
You are not alone in this road. Dozens of early adopter fell to this trap in the past.
This has a zero tech base and is pure bullshits.
If you want someone to take serious start to act as logical person.
If you want someone to take serious start to act as logical person.
read the blockchain data. check out the blockheights and time stamps. check out luke jr's code.
but naw. you dont think thats "techy" do you?
instead you think quoting human social drama is "techy"
(facepalm)
luke JR wanted a soft fork with his november 2016 release hoping for a christmas 2016 activation.
but even by spring 2017 it sat at only 35% flag...
so luke went on his mandatory controversial fork attempt which he mislead by pretending it was a softfork.
gmax happily calls it a bilateral split. and theres enough quotes on this forum that shows gmax loves thee buzzword 'bilateral'
but the funny part. luke wants to deny anything happened on august 1st.. truly funny.
it gets very obvious who the ones are that prefer to hug a dev, rather than think about code/features of a network
The man has spoken. I believe that ends franky1's debate on the topic.
....
split from the main chain, and made a new network that's separate from the old one.
....
split from the main chain, and made a new network that's separate from the old one.
go check the blockchain data and then check the code wrote by luke JR
what you will notice is that bch didnt even exist for hours AFTER core done their controversial fork. thus bch was not the cause but the reaction to an earlier cause.
blockchain timestamps dont lie
oh and luke wanted soft upgrade in 2015-16. but that failed. what occurred in august 2017 was not soft.
he can name a spade a shovel but the controversy and mandated apartheid tactics that happened shows it was hard
he and samson mow can wear a hat that says that they are janitors.. doesnt make it so.
truly gotta laugh at lukes lies about his lack of involvement in things/ inability to do things. and yet his linked in profile show's his ego showing off(while still misleading) his involvement
even Roger Ver not believe what you just write.
This has a zero tech base and is pure bullshits.
If you want someone to take serious start to act as logical person.
The man has spoken. I believe that ends franky1's debate on the topic.
....
split from the main chain, and made a new network that's separate from the old one.
....
split from the main chain, and made a new network that's separate from the old one.
go check the blockchain data and then check the code wrote by luke JR
what you will notice is that bch didnt even exist for hours AFTER core done their controversial fork. thus bch was not the cause but the reaction to an earlier cause.
blockchain timestamps dont lie
oh and luke wanted soft upgrade in 2015-16. but that failed. what occurred in august 2017 was not soft.
he can name a spade a shovel but the controversy and mandated apartheid tactics that happened shows it was hard
he and samson mow can wear a hat that says that they are janitors.. doesnt make it so.
truly gotta laugh at lukes lies about his lack of involvement in things/ inability to do things. and yet his linked in profile show's his ego showing off(while still misleading) his involvement
I think that all users of cryptocurrency who already have enough experience are wary of this type of application. Today there are already quite a lot of scammers, as well as trolls who spread any information, in order to achieve certain goals. But it is not a fact that all this news should be listened to.
PSA: The troll is lying.
bcash is an airdrop altcoin. It is not Bitcoin in any sense.
Bitcoin did not split in 2017.
bcash is an airdrop altcoin. It is not Bitcoin in any sense.
Bitcoin did not split in 2017.
The man has spoken. I believe that ends franky1's debate on the topic.
and if so why there is only one line to bcash even after 2 forks and not two lines?
you are not honest even to your shitcoin propaganda.
edit: i forget.... this forks are "upgrades"....
you are not honest even to your shitcoin propaganda.
edit: i forget.... this forks are "upgrades"....
but really think about the real world
canadian DOLLAR
australian DOLLAR
zimbabwe DOLLAR
That's a good analogy. They're each separate currencies, the same as BitcoinCash is a separate cryptocurrency from Bitcoin. BitcoinCash copied the software, made incompatible changes, split from the main chain, and made a new network that's separate from the old one.
PSA: The troll is lying.
bcash is an airdrop altcoin. It is not Bitcoin in any sense.
Bitcoin did not split in 2017.
bcash is an airdrop altcoin. It is not Bitcoin in any sense.
Bitcoin did not split in 2017.
bilateral split was GMAX's buzzword
RESEARCH IS HEALTHY. try it
luke JR loved his mandatory code to cause the split. he has been celebrating its success ever since.
RESEARCH IS HEALTHY. try it
RESEARCH IS HEALTHY. try it
luke JR loved his mandatory code to cause the split. he has been celebrating its success ever since.
RESEARCH IS HEALTHY. try it
What's there to research? Even you can't prove that that "term" is "their buzzword". It's from Roger Ver's anti-Bitcoin propaganda, and everyone knows it.
Come down to reality, it's healthy. Try it.
Roger Ver only target is new members who just enter into crypto currency roger ver website convert those users to bitcoin cash and keep holding bitcoin cash as real bitcoin he keep doing this for very long time
Roger Ver is a well known scammer. He promote several times in the past shitcoin only because he decide to buy low and sell high, Dash is a great example of this.
I dont know how this guy had for so many years reputation to bitcoin community. Is very good for the health of bitcoin ecosystem this guys to leave from community, but i have my doubts that they will not return back as their shitcoin have epic failed.
Roger Ver only target is new members who just enter into crypto currency roger ver website convert those users to bitcoin cash and keep holding bitcoin cash as real bitcoin he keep doing this for very long time
and if so why there is only one line to bcash even after 2 forks and not two lines?
you are not honest even to your shitcoin propaganda.
edit: i forget.... this forks are "upgrades"....
you are not honest even to your shitcoin propaganda.
edit: i forget.... this forks are "upgrades"....
my shitcoin propaganda?.... dang seems you too cant contemplate independent thought
i dont care about the drama of the altcoins after the august 2017 event.(emphasis upon emphasis 'bilateral' is gmax's buzzword)
you seem to be stuck in a team X or team Y mindset that you cant even envision independent thought of not belonging to any team... i know shock right. someone thats not fanboying any team.. OMG your thinking it must be impossible.
core devs admit to a bilateral split as do those on the altcoin side.
the only propaganda is those trying to fight over ownership of a brand NO_ONE should own
if you keep thinking core deserves bitcoin brand then you have failed decentralisation class lesson one
EMPHASIS NO ONE should own the brand.
EMPHASIS NO ONE should own the brand.
take 2 steps back, open your mind. sit on the fence and ask yourself
"who owns 'dollar'?"
some patriotic hillbillies will scream blue murder its 'murica
but really think about the real world
canadian DOLLAR
australian DOLLAR
zimbabwe DOLLAR
then think
is the world at crisis with the confusion CAD vs USD... no
I see Roger Ver's nonsense, I often see his tweets full of nonsense always comparing the transaction costs of Bitcoin with BCH, whereas I'm sure not many people are interested in him, only some small groups that don't influence Bitcoin 
it is so absurd that they keep advertising "Satoshi vision" and talk about being the "original" while they are betraying the first and most important thing in bitcoin which is consensus (that is a part of being decentralized). basically they started the movement that any idiot with 1 to 5% hashrate started creating a fork of bitcoin and called his shitcoin the "real" bitcoin.
what you never see them talk about is how they are showing a middle finger to the "majority" by doing that. it is like if in a country 99% of the population voted for president X but Y were put in the seat of power instead whilst talking about democracy!
what you never see them talk about is how they are showing a middle finger to the "majority" by doing that. it is like if in a country 99% of the population voted for president X but Y were put in the seat of power instead whilst talking about democracy!
not defending ver or wright coin, as they have no big merchant adoption.. but, even the likes of luke JR and greg maxwell admit that the august 2017 event was a TWO WAY SPLIT
to me all this drama is like comparing american dollar with canadian or australian or even zimbabwe dollar. where some cry babies are crying that people dont like others using the word dollar. even though no one should own completely and exclusively the brand dollar, not even USA.
(analogy swap dollar for bitcoin, swap usa for core, swap canada for ver, swap australia for wright)
segwits code is not the same as the pre split code. meaning the post-split code is different. so yes it is a
/------------
----<
\------------
and not a
_____________
\_________
also looking at the timestamps of the blocks of the split. cores blocks split first. and then vers coin reacted HOURS later.even the social drama shwows that core devs wanted a split first by talking about such months earlier.. and vers coin was only a reaction a few weeks befor the split.
i only say this because so many people wanna kiss ass soo much that facts get blurred out and over exaggerations start forming to try making one side or the other seem better/worse then they are
if you could sit on the fence and see both sides. your vision would be clearer
take the august 2017 split. to get the "99% core control" by november2017 which pooya87 mentions above. core had to mandate off controversially not just 1%, not just 5% but alot more than that in august 2017
the august 2017 was not a 99% vote for core. again even luke jr and greg maxwell know and mentioned it.
anyways
vers coin and wrights coin dont have merchant adoption or any real world publicity. so just leave them in the altcoin discussion category
if you want to continue to cry about that only core should own brand bitcoin. then you failed test one of decentralisation.
think about the word 'dollar' and its multi community usage in the world as an example analogy, it might wake you up
and if so why there is only one line to bcash even after 2 forks and not two lines?
you are not honest even to your shitcoin propaganda.
edit: i forget.... this forks are "upgrades"....
bilateral split was GMAX's buzzword
RESEARCH IS HEALTHY. try it
luke JR loved his mandatory code to cause the split. he has been celebrating its success ever since.
RESEARCH IS HEALTHY. try it
RESEARCH IS HEALTHY. try it
luke JR loved his mandatory code to cause the split. he has been celebrating its success ever since.
RESEARCH IS HEALTHY. try it
They should advertise the reversal of transactions, so little network power an order on nicehash can change everything!
Jump to: