Pages:
Author

Topic: Rootcoin unmoderated - 450 blocks with minimum difficulty, 110 blocks premined - page 3. (Read 6508 times)

sr. member
Activity: 644
Merit: 251
The key is BitKey.
Though I invested in this coin, I once called it scam because of second ico and launch delay.
Based on what I have seen, I think the best way is to wait for the BitKey.

I invested too,but i sold.
Another reason is sell technology Grin

[ANN][ICG][X11] IncognitoCoin ANON-tx using BitKey™ | Pos 5% | Bittrex
Another coin with BitKey Shocked

He had deal with ICG. I don't think that matters.
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
There is a day to be born, and another to die
The key is BitKey.
Though I invested in this coin, I once called it scam because of second ico and launch delay.
Based on what I have seen, I think the best way is to wait for the BitKey.

I invested too,but i sold.
Another reason is sell technology Grin

[ANN][ICG][X11] IncognitoCoin ANON-tx using BitKey™ | Pos 5% | Bittrex
Another coin with BitKey Shocked
sr. member
Activity: 644
Merit: 251
The key is BitKey.
Though I invested in this coin, I once called it scam because of second ico and launch delay.
Based on what I have seen, I think the best way is to wait for the BitKey.
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
r00t-dev
Bitsta deleted my post linking to my negative coin review, so I made this unmoderated thread.

My review in full is here: https://github.com/Earlz/coinreviews/blob/master/rootcoin.txt

First topic of discussion can be the purposeful instamine. Basically, the difficulty adjustment is changed so that the first 450 blocks were minimum difficulty, meaning they got mined extremely quickly.

Second topic can be the actual premining of about 115 blocks. You can verify this yourself by checking the timestamps on blocks 2-115 using ssdpools(terrible) block explorer, or checking using the debug window, and comparing to when he announced the launch of the coin (August 23, 2014, 01:09:49 AM UTC).

For reference, me and bitsta talked a bit in #bittrex IRC about it. If you'd like to see his side as well: http://pastebin.com/2zrfGH3J

thats right. +100 blocks were mined at the offical pool. the rest wasn't mined by me. It was a instamine. but not by me nor any other teammember.
So there were about 38k ROOTs instamined by some lucky miners. well. good luck to them. they sure already dumped at me, or sold me the coins during my ROOT-buybacks.  

As for the disabled difficulty during the first 450 PoW blocks. This coin, is like EVERY (or most) other altcoin, forked form a previous project. I already
forked the codebase again to my github-repo to prevent it from beeing deleted. So that proofes that the diff WAS NOT disabled by me. Though i should ve checked the getnexttargetreq() function properly which i haven't done. This means there was a or some lucky miner/s at the beginning. Holding 38k ROOT like posted above.

cheers,
bitsta
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
There is a day to be born, and another to die
I mined at Rootcoin pool since it opened with constant 1 GH/s just to find only 200 ROOT in my wallet now

What an insane IPO scam by known scammer bitsta, arghhh Undecided

Danger,ROOT Coin developed by bitsta,a SCAMER!
hi barabbas,

i just want to make something clear.

i ve worked for shogun47 (@XLB) thats right. and i HAVE FULLY FULLFILLED MY contract. I VE MADE WHAT I WAS TOLD TO MAKE.
(added an invalidation block into the sources, swapping all signing pub_keys, etc...)

the failed attempt to get all users on that codebase was not part of the contract and therefor NEITHER MY FAULT NOR MY RESPONSIBILITY!!!



as for PoS transition of NAUT: i won't ever release an unstable and potentially buggy PoS system. there are many reasons for that (reputation, lossrisk for users, etc.).

we are acually working on the PoS for NAUT and adapting the stakemodifier like i stated in my earlier post.


regards,
bitsta
I think Bitsta was involved on several other coins that went to shit. Glad to see someone who isn't afraid to post their real ID.
Well bitsta is launching rootcoin  today 'with bit key' so is he still doing work or not

He got paid to do work on NAUT and that never happened either, they had to hire blocktech in the end. Good luck.
no i am not part of their team. i am just doing contract-based adaptions for their sourcecode.
well it s not sure if i ll implement BitKey into their coin or not. I might get back to original
contract specifications which would mean i ll implement them an slave-node system for anon-tx.
that would be an adapted mixing-node "network". but i think i ll stick with my solution which seems
more professional.

ROOTCOIN will be first coin to have BitKey implemented and longterm support. thats for sure.

You're paying this guy 6 BTC and he isn't even sure if he'll put in his best effort because he has a conflict of interest with a coin he just started himself?

thats totally bullshit and nonsense. i always put my best effort into all projects i am involved in.
and i also stated that i ll stick with my solution! ICG will be rocking once i am done with it.

i won't let others bring me or our plans down.

I saw before Grin
sr. member
Activity: 439
Merit: 250
mmmmmm
Bitsta deleted my post linking to my negative coin review, so I made this unmoderated thread.

My review in full is here: https://github.com/Earlz/coinreviews/blob/master/rootcoin.txt

First topic of discussion can be the purposeful instamine. Basically, the difficulty adjustment is changed so that the first 450 blocks were minimum difficulty, meaning they got mined extremely quickly.

Second topic can be the actual premining of about 115 blocks. You can verify this yourself by checking the timestamps on blocks 2-115 using ssdpools(terrible) block explorer, or checking using the debug window, and comparing to when he announced the launch of the coin (August 23, 2014, 01:09:49 AM UTC).

For reference, me and bitsta talked a bit in #bittrex IRC about it. If you'd like to see his side as well: http://pastebin.com/2zrfGH3J
Pages:
Jump to: