I'd like you to add Cryptsy. They seem to have every coin imaginable. But at the same time that probably is a lot of work to put that together.
regards
Topic: RTBTC - Bitcoin Exchange Trading Interface - page 2. (Read 13779 times)
First of all thank you for your product.
Are there any plans for btcchina support and a dom as half as good as jigsaw?
Are there any plans for btcchina support and a dom as half as good as jigsaw?
Thank you, and yes. The issue here is the lack of streaming real time data. Some solution will have to be created on the server.
a dom as half as good as jigsaw?
What?
First of all thank you for your product.
Are there any plans for btcchina support and a dom as half as good as jigsaw?
Are there any plans for btcchina support and a dom as half as good as jigsaw?
CampBX please 
there is already bitstamp. Not many people use camp BX. So I think it's important to get other crypto currencies than BTC.
CampBX please
will you be adding BTC-E soon or another exchange? I'd like to trade LTC instead of BTC.
Many thanks,
Brian
Many thanks,
Brian
Everything is coming SoonTM
Yes, more exchanges will be supported at some point. I would like to get the alt-coins into RTBTC as well.
okay, do you have an ETA?
Thanks Clark
will you be adding BTC-E soon or another exchange? I'd like to trade LTC instead of BTC.
Many thanks,
Brian
Many thanks,
Brian
Everything is coming SoonTM
Yes, more exchanges will be supported at some point. I would like to get the alt-coins into RTBTC as well.
will you be adding BTC-E soon or another exchange? I'd like to trade LTC instead of BTC.
Many thanks,
Brian
Many thanks,
Brian
I just started using RTBTC and I've noticed a problem when trading with Bitstamp. Orders disappear from the order book as soon as they've been at least partially filled. Orders that have not been completely filled should obviously remain in the order book, but they don't. This doesn't appear to be an issue with Bitstamp because the live order book on their site continues to show the orders, and they only disappear once they've been completely filled or cancelled. I'm using v0.2.9.
I've also noticed that the account balances often don't update for a while or at all, but that could be a Bitstamp issue. I'm aware that their API isn't the best.
I've also noticed that the account balances often don't update for a while or at all, but that could be a Bitstamp issue. I'm aware that their API isn't the best.
Your prompt attention to issues, makes me wonder why you yourself, haven't launched an exchange. I'd be the first to sign up.
Let's wait until the US Government makes a pronouncement on Bitcoin's legal status. Until then, no bank in the US will touch a Bitcoin company (for the most part -- Coinbase notwithstanding).
Version 0.2.8
This behavior exhibits the laggy nature of the Bitstamp API. I've decided that the RTBTC platform should not guess at the true state of your wallet or open orders. It simply reports what the exchange gives it. If you would like to see this 'bug' go away, please open a support ticket with Bitstamp, asking them to fix their API.
Here is an example you could send to the support team at Bitstamp:
This behavior exhibits the laggy nature of the Bitstamp API. I've decided that the RTBTC platform should not guess at the true state of your wallet or open orders. It simply reports what the exchange gives it. If you would like to see this 'bug' go away, please open a support ticket with Bitstamp, asking them to fix their API.
Here is an example you could send to the support team at Bitstamp:
Quote from: Otherwise Happy RTBTC User
Dear Bitstamp Support,
I absolutely love the RTBTC platform, but odd behavior in your API makes my cancelled orders show up even after I cancelled them.
Please propagate the user orders to the API call database quicker so I can enjoy RTBTC more thoroughly.
The call giving me trouble is open_orders.
That is all. Thank you.
I absolutely love the RTBTC platform, but odd behavior in your API makes my cancelled orders show up even after I cancelled them.
Please propagate the user orders to the API call database quicker so I can enjoy RTBTC more thoroughly.
The call giving me trouble is open_orders.
That is all. Thank you.
Thanks for all the hardwork Clark. Your prompt attention to issues, makes me wonder why you yourself, haven't launched an exchange. I'd be the first to sign up.
Support ticket submitted and look forward to your continued updates. Thanks!
I know you are working on them but wanted to add a +1 for BTC-E. Gox just makes me too nervous to have any money in lately.
Version 0.2.8
The above image shows two open orders on the chart and the buy order is also highlighted in the Order Book.
1A Note on the Bitstamp API
Placing an order on Bitstamp seems to take place quickly, but getting that order to show up in the open_orders API call may take a significant amount of time. Same story with cancelling an order.
The RTBTC platform will show the user exactly what it gets from the Bitstamp API. Here are the steps to get 'buggy' behavior:
This behavior exhibits the laggy nature of the Bitstamp API. I've decided that the RTBTC platform should not guess at the true state of your wallet or open orders. It simply reports what the exchange gives it. If you would like to see this 'bug' go away, please open a support ticket with Bitstamp, asking them to fix their API.
Here is an example you could send to the support team at Bitstamp:
- Revamp of My Orders handling - See Note1
- Removed some checks in Order Entry to allow exchange to validate orders
- Show user orders in the Order Book and on the Chart
- Fixed a sound bug such that trade sounds would not play for Bitstamp
The above image shows two open orders on the chart and the buy order is also highlighted in the Order Book.
1A Note on the Bitstamp API
Placing an order on Bitstamp seems to take place quickly, but getting that order to show up in the open_orders API call may take a significant amount of time. Same story with cancelling an order.
The RTBTC platform will show the user exactly what it gets from the Bitstamp API. Here are the steps to get 'buggy' behavior:
- Place an order
- Place another order
- Cancel the first order
- Original order shows up in My Orders, new order is gone
This behavior exhibits the laggy nature of the Bitstamp API. I've decided that the RTBTC platform should not guess at the true state of your wallet or open orders. It simply reports what the exchange gives it. If you would like to see this 'bug' go away, please open a support ticket with Bitstamp, asking them to fix their API.
Here is an example you could send to the support team at Bitstamp:
Quote from: Otherwise Happy RTBTC User
Dear Bitstamp Support,
I absolutely love the RTBTC platform, but odd behavior in your API makes my cancelled orders show up even after I cancelled them.
Please propagate the user orders to the API call database quicker so I can enjoy RTBTC more thoroughly.
The call giving me trouble is open_orders.
That is all. Thank you.
I absolutely love the RTBTC platform, but odd behavior in your API makes my cancelled orders show up even after I cancelled them.
Please propagate the user orders to the API call database quicker so I can enjoy RTBTC more thoroughly.
The call giving me trouble is open_orders.
That is all. Thank you.
Absolutely worth the price of admission.
Couple of issues on the Bitstamp side:
1. On Refresh-Sometimes active orders do not display on "Visual Depth" or " My Order". Have to switch between Gox and Stamp to get it to display.
2. High, Low, Volume and VWAP amounts do not display on ticker. Switching to Gox and back to Bitstamp will then display Gox data in the ticker.
3. The sound does not work for "price trade up" or "price trade down". Works fine on Gox.
Other than API issues which I don't think can be attributed to you, this platform continues to impress.
Couple of issues on the Bitstamp side:
1. On Refresh-Sometimes active orders do not display on "Visual Depth" or " My Order". Have to switch between Gox and Stamp to get it to display.
2. High, Low, Volume and VWAP amounts do not display on ticker. Switching to Gox and back to Bitstamp will then display Gox data in the ticker.
3. The sound does not work for "price trade up" or "price trade down". Works fine on Gox.
Other than API issues which I don't think can be attributed to you, this platform continues to impress.
The My Orders bugs are being worked on right now.
Bitstamp does not send ticker information in the live stream. I'm working on a way to get the high/low/volume information in there, but it would need to be polled.
The sound bug for Bitstamp is also being fixed. Look for an update this week.
Thanks for the feedback.
Absolutely worth the price of admission.
Couple of issues on the Bitstamp side:
1. On Refresh-Sometimes active orders do not display on "Visual Depth" or " My Order". Have to switch between Gox and Stamp to get it to display.
2. High, Low, Volume and VWAP amounts do not display on ticker. Switching to Gox and back to Bitstamp will then display Gox data in the ticker.
3. The sound does not work for "price trade up" or "price trade down". Works fine on Gox.
Other than API issues which I don't think can be attributed to you, this platform continues to impress.
Couple of issues on the Bitstamp side:
1. On Refresh-Sometimes active orders do not display on "Visual Depth" or " My Order". Have to switch between Gox and Stamp to get it to display.
2. High, Low, Volume and VWAP amounts do not display on ticker. Switching to Gox and back to Bitstamp will then display Gox data in the ticker.
3. The sound does not work for "price trade up" or "price trade down". Works fine on Gox.
Other than API issues which I don't think can be attributed to you, this platform continues to impress.
...
There are no guarantees when switching layouts! The modules are most likely created in the order you first added them to the layout.
But this works for me now, I added the Depth first and than the other windows! There are no guarantees when switching layouts! The modules are most likely created in the order you first added them to the layout.
Thanks!
OK, thanks.
The last-clicked module will be on top, ....
Strangely T&S window won't! I tried also to put it on the right side and the order book on the left... all the time I switched to an other layout T&S window disappears behind the Visual Depth. There are no guarantees when switching layouts! The modules are most likely created in the order you first added them to the layout.
OK, thanks.
The last-clicked module will be on top, ....
Strangely T&S window won't! I tried also to put it on the right side and the order book on the left... all the time I switched to an other layout T&S window disappears behind the Visual Depth. Save exchange setting to layout? Would it be possible to set up a separate layout for each exchange, that I can switch between my account by only clicking my saved layout? Yet it does not work.
I think layout should remain independent of exchange setting at this point.
But in the coming versions, there will be some changes regarding layouts and exchange + pair.
Would it be possible to "pin" a window over the other? E.g. T&S over Visual Depth like this. T&S disappears all the time behind Visual Depth, but not the Orderbook window.
I like to have Visual Depth on the full width of the screen. Would it be possible to have the scale on both sides, left and right?
I like to have Visual Depth on the full width of the screen. Would it be possible to have the scale on both sides, left and right?
The last-clicked module will be on top, but in general, the modules are not meant to maintain any stacking order or overlap too much.
Left and right scale would probably work. I also need to add in the fiat amount to get to each point on the visual depth.
Jump to: