I've read this news a few days ago and the recent Chinese case which is somehow similar to this one came to mind. There was a legal battle over whether or not Bitcoin is an asset under the Chinese law. If it is, then it is protected by law. If it isn't, then all hell breaks loose.
The only difference is that the Chinese case ended up in favor of Bitcoin as an asset while this one does not seem to favor Bitcoin as a property.
My point, however, is simply that if something owned by someone is stolen or robbed by another then, by all means, it is illegal and should therefore be returned to its owner, regardless if that particular thing is legally classified as an asset or not.
It do indeed devoid of common sense but since this rule or law had been set out then it should be strictly followed which is really very upsetting.
Something thats being possessed nor owned by someone should really be having that reconsideration that it should really be returned.