Russian Military Photos/Videos Thread:

Croin

sr. member

Activity: 518

Merit: 250

Quote from: joebrook on October 24, 2017, 01:30:50 AM

Quote from: bakul idu on October 18, 2017, 01:56:27 AM

The russian military has long been does have a force that ca not underestimate , even russia famous with the most aggressive.

The current world is all about Nuclear Weaponry which makes all other weapons nearly useless. That's why the USA are very aggressive towards the North Koreans simply exploding a nuclear warhead over the USA will take out their radars and allow any incursion into the country.

Its not that easy they don't really have the technology to reach the US soil

joebrook

sr. member

Activity: 644

Merit: 259

CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!

Quote from: bakul idu on October 18, 2017, 01:56:27 AM

The russian military has long been does have a force that ca not underestimate , even russia famous with the most aggressive.

The current world is all about Nuclear Weaponry which makes all other weapons nearly useless. That's why the USA are very aggressive towards the North Koreans simply exploding a nuclear warhead over the USA will take out their radars and allow any incursion into the country.

Croin

sr. member

Activity: 518

Merit: 250

bakul idu

member

Activity: 87

Merit: 10

The russian military has long been does have a force that ca not underestimate , even russia famous with the most aggressive.

Croin

sr. member

Activity: 518

Merit: 250

Anyone who is watching my thread Lips sealed

=?

Croin

sr. member

Activity: 518

Merit: 250

Croin

sr. member

Activity: 518

Merit: 250

Croin

sr. member

Activity: 518

Merit: 250

Oh come one flat earth thread has 200 pages and here we are at 2 wtf guys.
Is even anyone interested in this Thread?

Croin

sr. member

Activity: 518

Merit: 250

Here you go

a T90AM

Croin

sr. member

Activity: 518

Merit: 250

Sithara007

legendary

Activity: 3346

Merit: 1352

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: joebrook on August 12, 2017, 06:28:38 PM

The unit cost of the F-35B plane is said to cost about $123M and they have spent close to $1.508 Trillion and they have so far manufactured about 231 units and the contract will run up to 2070. Even though its costly, i think its too late to abandon the project due to the amount of money spent on it and i really doubt NATO will purchase fighter jets from the Russians which individual unit cost about $50 M. Way cheaper than the F-35.

Hmm... I don't think that the NATO will scrap the F-35 project. But at least they should audit the expenses, to make sure that tax payer money is not wasted in the future on such useless projects.

joebrook

sr. member

Activity: 644

Merit: 259

CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!

Quote from: Sithara007 on August 07, 2017, 11:02:38 PM

The development cost of the Sukhoi PAK FA is around $8 billion. That of the Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II is estimated at $1.5 trillion right now (and may climb to $2.5 trillion in the future). And it seems that PAK FA is superior when compared to the F-35. So my question is, when the Russians can produce stealth fighters at one-hundredth of the cost when compared to the Americans, what prevented the NATO from purchasing the PAK FA, rather than wasting trillions of USD in to the F-35 program?

The unit cost of the F-35B plane is said to cost about $123M and they have spent close to $1.508 Trillion and they have so far manufactured about 231 units and the contract will run up to 2070. Even though its costly, i think its too late to abandon the project due to the amount of money spent on it and i really doubt NATO will purchase fighter jets from the Russians which individual unit cost about $50 M. Way cheaper than the F-35.

Croin

sr. member

Activity: 518

Merit: 250

Quote from: thebedside on August 12, 2017, 10:12:24 AM

Quote from: Sithara007 on August 11, 2017, 12:38:28 AM

Quote from: stompix on August 09, 2017, 04:25:01 PM

Quote from: Sithara007 on August 07, 2017, 11:02:38 PM

The development cost of the Sukhoi PAK FA is around $8 billion. That of the Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II is estimated at $1.5 trillion right now (and may climb to $2.5 trillion in the future). And it seems that PAK FA is superior when compared to the F-35. So my question is, when the Russians can produce stealth fighters at one-hundredth of the cost when compared to the Americans, what prevented the NATO from purchasing the PAK FA, rather than wasting trillions of USD in to the F-35 program?

It's simple....
201 F35 built....0 PAK FA flying.
You see where the 1/100 comes from?

More than 200 F-35 have been built. But how many are operational? Ever since the first flight, a lot of bugs and operational issues are being uncovered everyday. It will take them another 10 years to make the F-35 fully functional.

I wonder if the PAK FA has sensor fusion and that DAS technology.. The problem with the F-35 is that it has another variant for each of the branches of the US armed forces making it difficult to develop... And they paralled the testing and design phase with early production so they find a lot of bugs after production.

thebedside

newbie

Activity: 12

Merit: 0

Quote from: Sithara007 on August 11, 2017, 12:38:28 AM

Quote from: stompix on August 09, 2017, 04:25:01 PM

Quote from: Sithara007 on August 07, 2017, 11:02:38 PM

The development cost of the Sukhoi PAK FA is around $8 billion. That of the Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II is estimated at $1.5 trillion right now (and may climb to $2.5 trillion in the future). And it seems that PAK FA is superior when compared to the F-35. So my question is, when the Russians can produce stealth fighters at one-hundredth of the cost when compared to the Americans, what prevented the NATO from purchasing the PAK FA, rather than wasting trillions of USD in to the F-35 program?

It's simple....
201 F35 built....0 PAK FA flying.
You see where the 1/100 comes from?

More than 200 F-35 have been built. But how many are operational? Ever since the first flight, a lot of bugs and operational issues are being uncovered everyday. It will take them another 10 years to make the F-35 fully functional.

I wonder if the PAK FA has sensor fusion and that DAS technology.. The problem with the F-35 is that it has another variant for each of the branches of the US armed forces making it difficult to develop... And they paralled the testing and design phase with early production so they find a lot of bugs after production.

Croin

sr. member

Activity: 518

Merit: 250

Quote from: Palmerson on August 12, 2017, 05:48:37 AM

If you listen to all specifications and striking power of Russia's only aircraft carrier Admiral Kuznetsov that looks awesome, but the whole world laughed as it was dragged in tow to Syria so he fired several missiles and lost 2 aircraft. It is against him, no one fought! All Russia is a big fake and its army is no exception.

First:
1. It was not dragged.
2. Russia never had an aircraft carrier as it was never the doctrine of Russia to have one. It's a heavy aircraft carrying cruiser.

If Russia army is a big fake, how do you call this:
https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2015/10/23/russias-military-is-proving-western-punditry-wrong/

“Russia’s fighter jets are, for now at least, conducting nearly as many strikes in a typical day against rebel troops opposing the government of President Bashar al-Assad as the American-led coalition targeting the Islamic State has been carrying out each month this year (emphasis added).

Palmerson

sr. member

Activity: 434

Merit: 255

Live cams shows pimped with cryptocurrency

If you listen to all specifications and striking power of Russia's only aircraft carrier Admiral Kuznetsov that looks awesome, but the whole world laughed as it was dragged in tow to Syria so he fired several missiles and lost 2 aircraft. It is against him, no one fought! All Russia is a big fake and its army is no exception.

Croin

sr. member

Activity: 518

Merit: 250

mvidetto

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 250

lets compare it to American army Grin

GideonGono

hero member

Activity: 2086

Merit: 501

★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!

All I just want to say is to fire all missiles of Russia and USA straight to Kim Jong Un's face! I also hope that if North Korea would decide to start a war which they are implying in the news, no one would ally with them.

By the way, can someone add some pictures in their military bases with the line of fleets, tanks, etc.

Sithara007

legendary

Activity: 3346

Merit: 1352

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: stompix on August 09, 2017, 04:25:01 PM

Quote from: Sithara007 on August 07, 2017, 11:02:38 PM

The development cost of the Sukhoi PAK FA is around $8 billion. That of the Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II is estimated at $1.5 trillion right now (and may climb to $2.5 trillion in the future). And it seems that PAK FA is superior when compared to the F-35. So my question is, when the Russians can produce stealth fighters at one-hundredth of the cost when compared to the Americans, what prevented the NATO from purchasing the PAK FA, rather than wasting trillions of USD in to the F-35 program?

It's simple....
201 F35 built....0 PAK FA flying.
You see where the 1/100 comes from?

More than 200 F-35 have been built. But how many are operational? Ever since the first flight, a lot of bugs and operational issues are being uncovered everyday. It will take them another 10 years to make the F-35 fully functional.

Topic: Russian Military Photos/Videos Thread: (Read 1105 times)