rx 480 is 24 mhs | Bitcointalksearch.org

philipma1957

legendary

Activity: 4256

Merit: 8551

'The right to privacy matters'

Quote from: Qastessa on July 07, 2016, 06:01:23 AM

Quote from: Q_R_V on July 07, 2016, 02:12:44 AM

Memory @ 2200MHz? Are we still talking about 380x?

They are talking about the AMD RX480. The memory speed at 2200 MHz can get you about 27MH/s.

yeah you can go to 2215 and squeeze a little more.
It always crashes at 2225

but I got my 2 cards to 2215 and 2216 I get 54.5 mh

Qastessa

full member

Activity: 182

Merit: 100

Quote from: Q_R_V on July 07, 2016, 02:12:44 AM

Memory @ 2200MHz? Are we still talking about 380x?

They are talking about the AMD RX480. The memory speed at 2200 MHz can get you about 27MH/s.

Q_R_V

sr. member

Activity: 428

Merit: 250

Inactivity: 8963

Memory @ 2200MHz? Are we still talking about 380x?

Dobmader

full member

Activity: 165

Merit: 100

Quote from: Q_R_V on June 23, 2016, 01:40:18 PM

18 Mh/s seems a little low. What with Memory @ 1500 MHz it should be ~21 Mh/s.
With 5x 380x i am able to achive 700W from the wall when minning ETH, quite happy with that result

From what I see, it will do around 27 MHz when the memory frequency is about 2200MHz. It is memory dependent.

Q_R_V

sr. member

Activity: 428

Merit: 250

Inactivity: 8963

18 Mh/s seems a little low. What with Memory @ 1500 MHz it should be ~21 Mh/s.
With 5x 380x i am able to achive 700W from the wall when minning ETH, quite happy with that result

navydude

sr. member

Activity: 283

Merit: 250

I have both 380 and 380x and they dont mine the same. Maybe if you OC the card. A 380x has 21.5 mhs and a 380 has 18 mhs. I have both already. the price difference is 20 dollars or less. I paid 199 for these 380x cards so thats about what 380 cards are going for. Plus as the other post stated the 380 is volt locked. I am using Trixx to (-75) undervolt and working well so far. Knocked about 120w off the 5 380 cards i have running. Not alot but over 9 or 10 rigs that will add up. I expect the 380x will be even better savings. Will find out this weekend.

Amph

legendary

Activity: 3248

Merit: 1070

Quote from: Marvell1 on June 22, 2016, 04:19:43 PM

Quote from: Amph on June 22, 2016, 03:22:36 PM

Quote from: Tmdz on June 22, 2016, 02:40:31 PM

No the 1070 does 31-32 mh Roll Eyes

http://forum.ethereum.org/discussion/7722/gtx-1070-fe-mining-benchmarks

------

Results as expected, its pretty good if it comes out to be true. Also the 490 will be released some months later and that has a higher bandwidth memory so results could be quite good with that.

So the 480 is MORE efficient than the 1070 and costs half as much

1070 = 4.68 watts per MH

480 = 4.16 watts per MH

no that is old, check this update http://forum.ethereum.org/discussion/7780/gtx1070-linux-installation-and-mining-clue-goodbye-amd-welcome-nvidia-for-miners#latest

same guy, can do 37MH almost stable, he is tweaking it, 35MH stable at 140w

even if a 480 cost half of it, and can do 48MH with two of them you will consume more, like 50% more for a 33% increase in hashrate (48 vs 37), so it's worse

with an bios mode and undervolt i expect the 480 to do closer to 27mhs for 80 watts so it will be alot better than one 1070

well that is yet to be seen, i think he can tweak it to have less wattage used at 37MH, still i prefer the 1070 for density, i need to buy less rig, which is always saving money in the end

Tmdz

hero member

Activity: 1008

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Amph on June 22, 2016, 03:22:36 PM

Quote from: Tmdz on June 22, 2016, 02:40:31 PM

No the 1070 does 31-32 mh Roll Eyes

http://forum.ethereum.org/discussion/7722/gtx-1070-fe-mining-benchmarks

------

Results as expected, its pretty good if it comes out to be true. Also the 490 will be released some months later and that has a higher bandwidth memory so results could be quite good with that.

So the 480 is MORE efficient than the 1070 and costs half as much

1070 = 4.68 watts per MH

480 = 4.16 watts per MH

no that is old, check this update http://forum.ethereum.org/discussion/7780/gtx1070-linux-installation-and-mining-clue-goodbye-amd-welcome-nvidia-for-miners#latest

same guy, can do 37MH almost stable, he is tweaking it, 35MH stable at 140w

even if a 480 cost half of it, and can do 48MH with two of them you will consume more, like 50% more for a 33% increase in hashrate (48 vs 37), so it's worse

I stand corrected sir.

Looks pretty darn good but still having to mess around with linux seems like a pain for the gain but If my power cost was higher I would change my tone. I use to live in Cali with 26 cent per kw but now im in Oregon with less than half that, so power usage is no where near as big of a deal as it once was.

I think personally Im just partial to Ati card just due to the fact I have used them for years and they have always gave me excellent service and long life.

Also just yesterday I ran some conduit and put in a 20 amp 120v circuit with a dedicated ground to be used only by my mining hardware in the shop. I considered running 220v service but the 120 seemed more convenient at this point, even with that I can run around 15 gpus or so with the setup and about 30 if I switch to 220v with the new cards coming out.

Psynthax

hero member

Activity: 2366

Merit: 504

Quote from: Amph on June 22, 2016, 03:22:36 PM

even if a 480 cost half of it, and can do 48MH with two of them you will consume more, like 50% more for a 33% increase in hashrate (48 vs 37), so it's worse

for me electricity is free so I find a better deal in rx 480s and I am using windows 10 so 480s I will buy..

gotta wait another week and I am loosing patience..

Marvell1

legendary

Activity: 2408

Merit: 1102

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: Q_R_V on June 22, 2016, 05:41:56 PM

Quote from: Marvell1 on June 22, 2016, 04:17:48 PM

30 380x ? you made a mistake on those the 380 mines at same hash rate as the 380x and is cheaper bro

But 380 are voltage locked and 380x aren't.

I have some MSI 380s they are not voltage locked the OC versions

ps_jb

hero member

Activity: 742

Merit: 500

Nothing on Amazon

Strange

Raja_MBZ

legendary

Activity: 1862

Merit: 1505

Well we can't rely on this one single experience. Real picture of this card would come out pretty soon, so I'd try it after seeing some more reviews. Anyone who actually gets it for the actual price would be pretty lucky though, as it's gonna be hard to get it for $199.

Quote

On the other hand the RX 470 could end up being a much more interesting choice for low power Ethereum mining if it manages to achieve the same hashrate, but at a better price when it hits the markets sometime next month.

I'm guessing that 470 could be a better card. Seems pretty interesting.

Q_R_V

sr. member

Activity: 428

Merit: 250

Inactivity: 8963

Quote from: Marvell1 on June 22, 2016, 04:17:48 PM

30 380x ? you made a mistake on those the 380 mines at same hash rate as the 380x and is cheaper bro

But 380 are voltage locked and 380x aren't.

Marvell1

legendary

Activity: 2408

Merit: 1102

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: Amph on June 22, 2016, 03:22:36 PM

Quote from: Tmdz on June 22, 2016, 02:40:31 PM

No the 1070 does 31-32 mh Roll Eyes

http://forum.ethereum.org/discussion/7722/gtx-1070-fe-mining-benchmarks

------

Results as expected, its pretty good if it comes out to be true. Also the 490 will be released some months later and that has a higher bandwidth memory so results could be quite good with that.

So the 480 is MORE efficient than the 1070 and costs half as much

1070 = 4.68 watts per MH

480 = 4.16 watts per MH

no that is old, check this update http://forum.ethereum.org/discussion/7780/gtx1070-linux-installation-and-mining-clue-goodbye-amd-welcome-nvidia-for-miners#latest

same guy, can do 37MH almost stable, he is tweaking it, 35MH stable at 140w

even if a 480 cost half of it, and can do 48MH with two of them you will consume more, like 50% more for a 33% increase in hashrate (48 vs 37), so it's worse

with an bios mode and undervolt i expect the 480 to do closer to 27mhs for 80 watts so it will be alot better than one 1070

Marvell1

legendary

Activity: 2408

Merit: 1102

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: navydude on June 22, 2016, 02:18:56 PM

Now i dont feel so bad. My new equipment arrived today. I ordered 30 380x, 5 290s, 1 390, and 1 390x. I was sure hoping that the 480 was going to be awesome but at the same time i really didnt want to wait any longer. So im kinda glad i went ahead with my order. I may throw another rig or two in with 480s once the drivers are tweaked.

30 380x ? you made a mistake on those the 380 mines at same hash rate as the 380x and is cheaper bro

Arnoldent

newbie

Activity: 64

Merit: 0

Quote from: Amph on June 22, 2016, 03:22:36 PM

Quote from: Tmdz on June 22, 2016, 02:40:31 PM

No the 1070 does 31-32 mh Roll Eyes

http://forum.ethereum.org/discussion/7722/gtx-1070-fe-mining-benchmarks

------

Results as expected, its pretty good if it comes out to be true. Also the 490 will be released some months later and that has a higher bandwidth memory so results could be quite good with that.

So the 480 is MORE efficient than the 1070 and costs half as much

1070 = 4.68 watts per MH

480 = 4.16 watts per MH

no that is old, check this update http://forum.ethereum.org/discussion/7780/gtx1070-linux-installation-and-mining-clue-goodbye-amd-welcome-nvidia-for-miners#latest

same guy, can do 37MH almost stable, he is tweaking it, 35MH stable at 140w

even if a 480 cost half of it, and can do 48MH with two of them you will consume more, like 50% more for a 33% increase in hashrate (48 vs 37), so it's worse

It seems only the $400 or more expensive R9 490 can beat the $400 1070. I am quite disappointed.

Amph

legendary

Activity: 3248

Merit: 1070

Quote from: Tmdz on June 22, 2016, 02:40:31 PM

No the 1070 does 31-32 mh Roll Eyes

http://forum.ethereum.org/discussion/7722/gtx-1070-fe-mining-benchmarks

------

Results as expected, its pretty good if it comes out to be true. Also the 490 will be released some months later and that has a higher bandwidth memory so results could be quite good with that.

So the 480 is MORE efficient than the 1070 and costs half as much

1070 = 4.68 watts per MH

480 = 4.16 watts per MH

no that is old, check this update http://forum.ethereum.org/discussion/7780/gtx1070-linux-installation-and-mining-clue-goodbye-amd-welcome-nvidia-for-miners#latest

same guy, can do 37MH almost stable, he is tweaking it, 35MH stable at 140w

even if a 480 cost half of it, and can do 48MH with two of them you will consume more, like 50% more for a 33% increase in hashrate (48 vs 37), so it's worse

Tmdz

hero member

Activity: 1008

Merit: 1000

No the 1070 does 31-32 mh Roll Eyes

http://forum.ethereum.org/discussion/7722/gtx-1070-fe-mining-benchmarks

------

Results as expected, its pretty good if it comes out to be true. Also the 490 will be released some months later and that has a higher bandwidth memory so results could be quite good with that.

So the 480 is MORE efficient than the 1070 and costs half as much

1070 = 4.68 watts per MH

480 = 4.16 watts per MH

Lucky - Luciano

hero member

Activity: 711

Merit: 500

Quote from: U253 on June 22, 2016, 11:37:35 AM

check the source: http://cryptomining-blog.com/8008-possible-ethereum-hashrate-for-the-new-amd-radeon-rx-480/

about 24 mhs without OC.

Why do you think this is true? If I good seen the picture in the background is not of GPU software (eg. GPU-Z) than from a Chinese website which selling RX 480.

Psynthax

hero member

Activity: 2366

Merit: 504

as far as I understand, you will be able to get 2 rx 480s for the price of 1070?

Topic: rx 480 is 24 mhs (Read 3624 times)