Compare:
https://github.com/alerj78/lucky7coin/blob/master/src/irc.cpp
https://github.com/OriginalBatCoin/BatCoin/blob/master/src/irc.cpp
This is how many early coins found their peers.
Not only did BigVern rip everyone off, he used such a pathetic excuse which he knew everyone who can't code would believe.
Its hype like this, from people repeating 'fings they herd' - that has ruined cryptocurrency.
^ what an idiot. clearly he didn't even actually compare them, because the lucky7 coin does have an irc backdoor, and the batcoin source does not.
dooglas summed it up pretty well in his "issue"
https://github.com/alerj78/lucky7coin/issues/1
maybe barrysty1e cant read.
In addition to Dooglus' explanation if a diff tool is used you can clearly see the new code that barrysty1e claims isn't there.
https://www.diffnow.com/?report=8u6xk
Yes but Cryptsy could just disable irc in the code and such hack could then be avoided.
I do not think Cryptsy could just disable IRC, FinanceUS. Coins cloned prior to the 0.6 release of bitcoin use IRC to find peers. In more recent cloned versions of bitcoin's source it is still implemented and can be enabled using the -irc command line option. Disabling or removing IRC from a coin would not only cause it to loose this ability, it may in fact, cause the coin to not function as it does need the ability to find peers. I have not inspected Lucky 7's code to know which version of bitcoin it was cloned from or if it was cloned from a subsequent clone. But, in any form and in Cryptsy's defense, blindly removing or disabling sections of code, especially what very well may be fundamental code, is not a good practice. I am not saying Cryptsy could not have avoided this. Simply, I am saying, disabling IRC is not the way they could have been expected to avoid this because, surely their staff knew of the core necessity of IRC in coins.
Take a peek in your favorite coin's debug.log file. Search for IRC.