"Just hours after refusing to attend a Senate hearing on his role in the collapse of FTX, Sam Bankman-Fried has been arrested by The Royal Bahamian Police Force, according to a statement from the Attorney General of The Bahamas Sen. Ryan Pinder KC."
This is false. SBF had agreed to testify before congress and was set to testify hours before his arrest.
The fact that his arrest effectively prevented his testimony makes it appear that corruption in the doj was involved in the timing of his arrest. It appeared that SBF was not taking legal advice from lawyers, and he would likely have incriminated himself while testifying.
No, it's not false. He refused to speak to the Senate banking committee.
https://cointelegraph.com/news/sbf-misses-the-senate-hearing-but-promises-to-testify-to-the-house-law-decodedMy mistake. Although the detail is a technical one.
SBF missed the deadline to say that he will testify before the senate. He had said that he will testify before the house. He was going to testify before the house hours before he was arrested.
Btw, I think it is likely that SBF didn’t understand how to properly respond to say that he would testify before the senate. There isn’t any reason why he would testify before the house but not the senate. There was testimony that was leaked that SBF was planning on making.
Yeah it doesn't really make sense, he definitely wasn't picky about who he was willing to speak with before they took him away. His lawyers did say that he was "unwilling to accept service of a subpoena" when addressing why he wasn't talking to the Senate, but I don't see why he would care if a subpoena were involved. Can testifying after being subpoenad expose you to less legal risk than doing it voluntarily? Either way he's obviously been ignoring his lawyers advice...
It's possible that subpoenas may have been sent to his lawyer instead of him directly, and his lawyers may have acted against his client's intentions (even if they may have been the most prudent thing to do).
It doesn't really make sense to refuse to testify before congress anyway. If he believed it was in his best interest to not testify, he could simply plead the 5th and not answer questions. Although his history indicates that even pleading the 5th is unlikely. This again raises the question as to why SBF would have been arrested
before scheduled testimony before congress (the house) when he had indicated he would testify. This smells of political corruption.
I'm cautiously optimistic. Once the U.S. Dept. of Justice indicts then he has almost sealed his fate. The feds have something like a 95% conviction rate so even with the best lawyers SBF will retain, they can't make bad facts disappear. And it's an unquestionable fact that SBF was oversaw the vaporization of billions in user funds. How his lawyers will try and explain away SBF's role will be up to them, of course.
You are assuming the DOJ is trying to get a conviction. I have yet to see an explanation as to why SBF was arrested less than 24 hours before he was scheduled to appear before congress to testify about FTX. IMO, it is almost certain that he would have made statements that would have helped the prosecution.
BINANCE WILL FALL NEXT!!! We Have The *PROOF* CZ Will Be ARRESTED SOON!!!!
I doubt it. Binance does not appear to be run by liberal idiots. I am sure that Binance is not perfect, and they may or may not be violating US securities laws, but I don't think that Binance is doing anything that would resemble embezzlement to any reasonable person.