Here we are again!
Although it certainly caught my attention, it doesn't really bother me that there's a Russian exchange suddenly sprouting from nowhere every now and then. What bothers me is how these exchanges are probably developed by a single team and that they may not be legal entities in the sense that they aren't actually licensed. In which case, they're unsafe to use.
I hope I'm wrong, but even to an untrained eye, the similarities don't appear simply as coincidental. It seems like one doesn't have to wear a tin foil hat to believe that all these exchanges are operated by the same persons. It's not necessarily bad, but one has to be transparent about it. Otherwise, one assumes that all are clandestine and illicit operations.
Hello dear!exchange offices may consist of the same software, but this does not mean that they are owned by the same people. Our service is exclusively sapfirex.com
Well, sharing the same software doesn't automatically mean sharing the same design. It seems UI is an integral part of the branding of an exchange. Especially amidst close competition, there seems to be the imperative to be identified individually and uniquely.
I don't understand how you claim to be exclusive when you are too similar with Jarvis Exchange and Tasty Changer. When one takes a look at the three of you, it seems you're triplets.
Take a look when Sapfirex is loading:
And then take a look when the other two are loading:
When one makes an exchange on Sapfirex, it looks like this:
And when one makes an exchange on the other two:
When one wants to know how to become a partner with Sapfirex, the tab looks like this:
And when one checks how to become a partner with the other two:
The similarities go on. How can an exclusive platform end up almost exactly like other exchanges? Mystery, coincidence, or Sapfirex, Jarvis Exchange, and Tasty Changer are developed by the same
high school student?
