Pages:
Author

Topic: Satisfaction rating - Bitcoin Core Developers (Read 1652 times)

legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2970
Terminated.
you should vote, its fun!
It really isn't.

I think it is a great idea, even if the sock puppets rule the show around here.
The poll is useless because nothing prevents you from creating accounts just to vote on it (e.g. high percentage of under 10%).

I voted 80% because I feel more can be done to communicate better with the community. The lack of communication and transparency is one of the contributing factors causing all the confusion.
This seems reasonable albeit I'd argue that this 'lack of transparency' is not a valid argument. I'm guessing most of their work is transparent (open source), you just might be looking at the wrong places. Communication is being worked on (e.g. they've created a website that has useful information Bitcoin Core).
legendary
Activity: 2828
Merit: 2472
https://JetCash.com
I vote to come out of the EU, oh wait! wrong thread. Sorry, but the way classic is being pushed, I thought Cameron had taken it over. Smiley

I voted 100% to try to avoid the rise of neo-classic Bitcoin.
hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 500
I voted with 100% as well of majority (until now). I haven't encounter a problem so far in my BTCitcoin experience, although some have (due to their own wrong doings) so I'm quite happy with the outcome so far. Although there isn't a thing as 100%, I'm sure when more complications rises, developers rise to occasions as well and would do their best to overcome it (that's what I've seen so far).
I would also agree to go with 100% since my experience with Bit coin has been so pleasant so far as well and for other people having unpleasant experience is only because of their wrong ways they might adopted. If take care of our own by ourselves what we write or post it positively helps and I am sure the moderators take nice actions always after checking the stuff thoroughly.
legendary
Activity: 3542
Merit: 1965
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
I think it is a great idea, even if the sock puppets rule the show around here. I voted 80% because I feel more can be done to communicate better with the community. The lack of communication and transparency is one of the contributing factors causing all the confusion. The developers should get a spoke person to represent their interest and to communicate to the public, whilst they concentrate on the coding part. Lots of people should agree that communication during or before a possible Hard fork, or the implementation of something new cause panic, and good communication will solve this.

Keep up the good work, but please communicate better with the uninformed noobs like us.  ^smile^
legendary
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1002
waww... never seen a poll so stupid...  that's just "posting for posting" .. just a shame  Huh

nothing more interesting to discuss? sincerly..


this make more sense:  
You do realise that this forum has no problem with sockpuppet accounts and therefore any "stupid vote" is absolutely not representational beyond the sock puppet ownership?

So you think that your stupid poll has any validity at all?

The only reason to create such a poll is that you already know the outcome because you control the sockies that are going to vote on it.

(so I'd say *don't bother voting because this entire topic is simply rubbish*)


legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner
there should be a 51% option.
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner
i count Lauda + 5 sock puppets

we'll be fine...



Certainly. Please stop with this foolishness. I do not vote in such polls (I have rarely done so in the past).

 Cheesy

sorry.

you should vote, its fun!
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2970
Terminated.
i count Lauda + 5 sock puppets

we'll be fine...



Certainly. Please stop with this foolishness. I do not vote in such polls (I have rarely done so in the past).
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner
-snip-
we'll be fine...

Was that ever a question? I will be looking forward to the comments.

 100% - 6 (20.7%)

i count Lauda + 5 sock puppets

we'll be fine...
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2970
Terminated.
I gave them a pretty poor rating. Sorry to their supporters, but the block size and scalability issue has been around for more than 3 quarters. It should have been solved last year already.
Such "issues" can't be solved quickly. A 2 MB block size limit does not improve scalability.

Equal oportunity sock puppeting?
Looks like it. This is why polls on this forum are very unreliable.
copper member
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1528
No I dont escrow anymore.
-snip-
we'll be fine...

Was that ever a question? I will be looking forward to the comments.
legendary
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000
★YoBit.Net★ 350+ Coins Exchange & Dice
To be honest i dont know what to believe any more. I hear so much Fud getting spread about from both sides i no longer know who is acting for the real good of bitcoin. It would be nice if the bitcoin community and devs could put their heads together instead of all this infighting.
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner
HA most vote are either 100% or less than 10%

silly sock puppets you supposed to all vote for the same thing.

Equal oportunity sock puppeting?

here we go CIYAM calling everyone stupid all day again.

The vote was called stupid and I agree with CIYAM. There will be nothing learned from the results because we cant know whether a single person voted 10 times.

the votes are not cryptographically verified? O_o!

Great, you are aware of the flaw, why defend the poll then? Its not like votes based on signed messages and btc balance are not implemented.

every time someone makes a poll we get a dumbass saying the poll is meaningless.

who cares this is a internet forum, not and election.

we'll be fine...
legendary
Activity: 3066
Merit: 1047
Your country may be your worst enemy
I gave them a pretty poor rating. Sorry to their supporters, but the block size and scalability issue has been around for more than 3 quarters. It should have been solved last year already.

About that very unscientific survey, why is the lowest rating below the highest? A linear order would have been better.
copper member
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1528
No I dont escrow anymore.
HA most vote are either 100% or less than 10%

silly sock puppets you supposed to all vote for the same thing.

Equal oportunity sock puppeting?

here we go CIYAM calling everyone stupid all day again.

The vote was called stupid and I agree with CIYAM. There will be nothing learned from the results because we cant know whether a single person voted 10 times.

the votes are not cryptographically verified? O_o!

Great, you are aware of the flaw, why defend the poll then? Its not like votes based on signed messages and btc balance are not implemented.
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner
HA most vote are either 100% or less than 10%

silly sock puppets you supposed to all vote for the same thing.
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner
here we go CIYAM calling everyone stupid all day again.

The vote was called stupid and I agree with CIYAM. There will be nothing learned from the results because we cant know whether a single person voted 10 times.

the votes are not cryptographically verified? O_o!
copper member
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1528
No I dont escrow anymore.
here we go CIYAM calling everyone stupid all day again.

The vote was called stupid and I agree with CIYAM. There will be nothing learned from the results because we cant know whether a single person voted 10 times.
legendary
Activity: 2968
Merit: 3406
Crypto Swap Exchange
I voted with 100% as well of majority (until now). I haven't encounter a problem so far in my BTCitcoin experience, although some have (due to their own wrong doings) so I'm quite happy with the outcome so far. Although there isn't a thing as 100%, I'm sure when more complications rises, developers rise to occasions as well and would do their best to overcome it (that's what I've seen so far).
legendary
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1115
Providing AI/ChatGpt Services - PM!
Considering they're not officially "paid"  for the job (they could be utilizing their programming skills for an MNC and stocking their savings ) which they didn't choose to.I'm quite satisfied with the development ,though there always be the block debates which are unlikely to be settled.
Pages:
Jump to: