Pages:
Author

Topic: Satoshi is "WE" not "I". - page 3. (Read 2737 times)

hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 1000
May 06, 2014, 05:13:32 AM
#16
Satoshi's still around. He's just working on another coin at the moment.

Nah, why would he do that?
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
Such is life in crypto paradise
May 06, 2014, 05:11:19 AM
#15
Just following the standard he or she even still remains as much a mystery to us as always

Satoshi isn't a he or a she, it's an IT.  A genderless Grey alien that came from Andromeda to save us all from the the evils of Illuminati fiat currency
legendary
Activity: 3598
Merit: 2386
Viva Ut Vivas
May 06, 2014, 04:18:53 AM
#14
He got some feedback from the crypto forums before the white paper.

People so want to believe that it was a community because in this day and age individual accomplishment is evil.
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
May 06, 2014, 04:00:09 AM
#13
Think this is just majestic plural.Or just a way to cause confusion about he being a single person or a group.
legendary
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1090
Learning the troll avoidance button :)
May 06, 2014, 03:27:37 AM
#12
Just following the standard he or she even still remains as much a mystery to us as always
hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500
May 06, 2014, 03:18:44 AM
#11
Yes i agree scientific papers must not use "I" but that  does not exclude the word "we" meant a team.

True, it doesn't necessarily exclude it. It just doesn't say anything meaningful about the solo/team matter one way or the other.
legendary
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1570
Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending
May 06, 2014, 03:16:36 AM
#10
It's the standard in academic publications to use "we" instead of "I" even if there is just a single author. The fact that "we" is used instead of "I" in the Bitcoin whitepaper says very little other than that Satoshi used an academic writing style, which is already obvious from other parts of the paper.

We +1 this! (I was seriously taking a wee when I type that... now I'm pooping, and don't ask me why I typed pooping instead of shitting, for I don't haveth a clue)
legendary
Activity: 2114
Merit: 1040
A Great Time to Start Something!
May 06, 2014, 01:37:20 AM
#9
We are Satoshi. 
We live here: Cheesy

member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
Casino, Lottery, Dice
May 06, 2014, 01:33:16 AM
#8

Satoshi has never written "I have proposed or I have done".



First e-mail from Satoshi:

"I've been working on a new electronic cash system that's fully peer-to-peer, with no trusted third party."
legendary
Activity: 2506
Merit: 1030
Twitter @realmicroguy
May 06, 2014, 01:20:28 AM
#7
Satoshi's still around. He's just working on another coin at the moment.
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 502
May 06, 2014, 01:03:14 AM
#6
Yes i agree scientific papers must not use "I" but that  does not exclude the word "we" meant a team.
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 500
May 06, 2014, 12:58:31 AM
#5
It's the standard in academic publications to use "we" instead of "I" even if there is just a single author. The fact that "we" is used instead of "I" in the Bitcoin whitepaper says very little other than that Satoshi used an academic writing style, which is already obvious from other parts of the paper.
this is correct... we is academic..
hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500
May 06, 2014, 12:55:36 AM
#4
It's the standard in academic publications to use "we" instead of "I" even if there is just a single author. The fact that "we" is used instead of "I" in the Bitcoin whitepaper says very little other than that Satoshi used an academic writing style, which is already obvious from other parts of the paper.
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 502
May 06, 2014, 12:54:59 AM
#3
So they are a team not a person?

Yes, as simple as that.
newbie
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
May 06, 2014, 12:51:20 AM
#2
So they are a team not a person?
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 502
May 06, 2014, 12:36:27 AM
#1
Just counted how many times the word "WE" is written in the original white paper and it is 20 times.

Satoshi has never written "I have proposed or I have done".

Then why should we still think Satoshi is a single person.

It must definitely be group hence "WE".

what do you think....

http://nakamotoinstitute.org/bitcoin/

Pages:
Jump to: