Topic: Satoshi Nakamoto Comes Back To Clear Blocksize Debate... - page 2. (Read 2761 times)
Price is bouncing back and people are talking about Satoshi again... It's a happy mood in bitcoinworld today.
The message about not being Dorian was posted on a compromised account
I thought so. but don't you think it's odd that whoever it was in control of that account didn't make any additional comment? like lying about this and that.
Because it's only BS if not signed by Satoshi's public key
-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
mQGiBEkJ+qcRBADKDTcZlYDRtP1Q7/ShuzBJzUh9hoVVowogf2W07U6G9BqKW24r
piOxYmErjMFfvNtozNk+33cd/sq3gi05O1IMmZzg2rbF4ne5t3iplXnNuzNh+j+6
VxxA16GPhBRprvnng8r9GYALLUpo9Xk17KE429YYKFgVvtTPtEGUlpO1EwCg7FmW
dBbRp4mn5GfxQNT1hzp9WgkD/3pZ0cB5m4enzfylOHXmRfJKBMF02ZDnsY1GqeHv
/LjkhCusTp2qz4thLycYOFKGmAddpVnMsE/TYZLgpsxjrJsrEPNSdoXk3IgEStow
mXjTfr9xNOrB20Qk0ZOO1mipOWMgse4PmIu02X24OapWtyhdHsX3oBLcwDdke8aE
gAh8A/sHlK7fL1Bi8rFzx6hb+2yIlD/fazMBVZUe0r2uo7ldqEz5+GeEiBFignd5
HHhqjJw8rUJkfeZBoTKYlDKo7XDrTRxfyzNuZZPxBLTj+keY8WgYhQ5MWsSC2MX7
FZHaJddYa0pzUmFZmQh0ydulVUQnLKzRSunsjGOnmxiWBZwb6bQjU2F0b3NoaSBO
YWthbW90byA8c2F0b3NoaW5AZ214LmNvbT6IYAQTEQIAIAUCSQn6pwIbAwYLCQgH
AwIEFQIIAwQWAgMBAh4BAheAAAoJEBjAnoZeyUihXGMAnjiWJ0fvmSgSM3o6Tu3q
RME9GN7QAKCGrFw9SUD0e9/YDcqhX1aPMrYue7kCDQRJCfqnEAgA9OTCjLa6Sj7t
dZcQxNufsDSCSB+yznIGzFGXXpJk7GgKmX3H9Zl4E6zJTQGXL2GAV4klkSfNtvgs
SGJKqCnebuZVwutyq1vXRNVFPQFvLVVo2jJCBHWjb03fmXmavIUtRCHoc8xgVJMQ
LrwvS943GgsqSbdoKZWdTnfnEq+UaGo+Qfv66NpT3Yl0CXUiNBITZOJcJdjHDTBO
XRqomX2WSguv+btYdhQGGQiaEx73XMftXNCxbOpqwsODQns7xTcl2ENru9BNIQME
I7L9FYBQUiKHm1k6RrBy1as8XElS2jEos7GAmlfF1wShFUX+NF1VOPdbN3ZdFoWq
sUjKk+QbrwADBQgA9DiD4+uuRhwk2B1TmtrXnwwhcdkE7ZbLHjxBfCsLPAZiPh8c
ICfV3S418i4H1YCz2ItcnC8KAPoS6mipyS28AU1B7zJYPODBn8E7aPSPzHJfudMK
MqiCHljVJrE23xsKTC0sIhhSKcr2G+6ARoG5lwuoqJqEyDrblVQQFpVxBNPHSTqu
O5PoLXQc7PKgC5SyQuZbEALEkItl2SL2yBRRGOlVJLnvZ6eaovkAlgsbGdlieOr0
UwWuJCwzZuBDruMYAfyQBvYfXZun3Zm84rW7Jclp18mXITwGCVHg/P5n7QMbBfZQ
A25ymkuj636Nqh+c4zRnSINfyrDcID7AcqEb6IhJBBgRAgAJBQJJCfqnAhsMAAoJ
EBjAnoZeyUihPrcAniVWl5M44RuGctJe+IMNX4eVkC08AJ9v7cXsp5uDdQNo8q3R
8RHwN4Gk8w==
=3FTe
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
it is going to clear itself soon...
The interesting part about the Bitcoin decentralization experiment, is that after sometime, those involved in it when it increases to a large enough degree, cannot agree with each other about anything, so progress becomes impeded.
Then people choose organizing bodies in the hope that it will change, but the more power/influence the individuals in that body have, the more they go in oft mutually exclusive directions for a variety of reasons, power/ego/greed/other, then even those in the leading body with lofty principles will clash with the former.
Then, the 'public' would naturally want to find out about which 'leader' they should believe/choose and open discourse begins. Before long, some clever candidate realizes that emotions affect votes more than logic does, and before you know it, there's Satoshi Nakamoto in a photograph holding a baby looking like a swell guy.
There is actually a very good reason why centralization exists, the Bitcoin experiment can be seen as something of a macrocosm of society and how it functions in view of mutual benefit - which is arguably the main point of all societies.
Were Nakamoto to stick his oar in, he'd ruin his own experiment.
Then people choose organizing bodies in the hope that it will change, but the more power/influence the individuals in that body have, the more they go in oft mutually exclusive directions for a variety of reasons, power/ego/greed/other, then even those in the leading body with lofty principles will clash with the former.
Then, the 'public' would naturally want to find out about which 'leader' they should believe/choose and open discourse begins. Before long, some clever candidate realizes that emotions affect votes more than logic does, and before you know it, there's Satoshi Nakamoto in a photograph holding a baby looking like a swell guy.
There is actually a very good reason why centralization exists, the Bitcoin experiment can be seen as something of a macrocosm of society and how it functions in view of mutual benefit - which is arguably the main point of all societies.
Were Nakamoto to stick his oar in, he'd ruin his own experiment.
i don't really know if this guy is gonna come back for the blocksize debate.
duh, it wastes the time. if he was actually getting here, he would announce, however, satoshi is banned, i doubt that if he is getting to clear.
duh, it wastes the time. if he was actually getting here, he would announce, however, satoshi is banned, i doubt that if he is getting to clear.
He won't come to solve "politics" trouble, he won't interfere in bitcoin anymore
Boom! Here I am. 
I definitely believe he is watching to see how the blocksize debate pans out but I don't think he is going to post anything.
I wouldn't hold your breath 
so that first message was not made by satoshi himself ?
The real Satoshi is probably dead. That Dorian post wasn't made by Satoshi (assuming everybody know that) but I get your point. You want somebody to heads up and clear the situation. I feel you, but this isn't corporate. There is no CEO. This is a decentralized technology and nobody have right to make the rules. Everybody can express their opinions.
Id prefer to see this solved by reason and not by authority.
deep
It is the post that I like the most in this thread yet. Satoshi's opinion isn't necessarily worth more than somebody's else.
who is dorian ,can i have a link?
google?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satoshi_Nakamoto#Dorian_Nakamoto
who is dorian ,can i have a link?
legendary
Activity: 2884
Merit: 1115
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
The message about not being Dorian was posted on a compromised account
I thought so. but don't you think it's odd that whoever it was in control of that account didn't make any additional comment? like lying about this and that.
That is exactly what I was wondering about, he could've manipulated the price quite a bit in the first hours that rumours start to spread.
Or the account was blocked very soon after that comment and he never had a chance.
The fun logical extension is that Satoshi hacked his own account to appear to be non-existent but obviously knew the password the whole time and used the long way to get in
The message about not being Dorian was posted on a compromised account
I thought so. but don't you think it's odd that whoever it was in control of that account didn't make any additional comment? like lying about this and that.
That is exactly what I was wondering about, he could've manipulated the price quite a bit in the first hours that rumours start to spread.
Or the account was blocked very soon after that comment and he never had a chance.
Id prefer to see this solved by reason and not by authority.
deep
The message about not being Dorian was posted on a compromised account
I thought so. but don't you think it's odd that whoever it was in control of that account didn't make any additional comment? like lying about this and that.
The message about not being Dorian was posted on a compromised account
He wouldn't come out to solve a stupid little quibble like this, otherwise people would expect him to pop up and solve every problem that people couldn't reach consensus on right away.
Jump to: