Pages:
Author

Topic: Satoshi Nakamoto's P2P foundation profile makes a reply (Read 108134 times)

legendary
Activity: 1457
Merit: 1001
If the real Satoshi wanted to go public, he would have no trouble providing solid proof. He also would have no reason to make passive aggressive comments and innuendo. This whole thing reaks of a sham.

Maybe David Kleiman has the private keys to the 1 million Bitcoin and died with it?
hero member
Activity: 786
Merit: 1000
If the real Satoshi wanted to go public, he would have no trouble providing solid proof. He also would have no reason to make passive aggressive comments and innuendo. This whole thing reaks of a sham.
copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374
Inb4 Satoshi says "I am not Dr. Craig Steven Wright."
Too bad that Wright is deliberately trying to make it look like as if he is satoshi. For example in the YouTube video when he is asked who he is and what his involvement in Bitcoin is, Wright could have easily come up with a better answer if he wanted to hide the fact that he is satoshi (assuming he is in fact satoshi, which I doubt). He obviously knew well in advance that he would be speaking, and he could have just as easily said something to make it look like he is not satoshi (if that is what he wanted, against probably not the case).

His response rather indicate to me, someone who is undecided on the matter. He wants to say something, but something is holding him back. It could be one huge elaborate hoax or it could be the real deal. He is obviously VERY intelligent and very private, and he ticks most of the boxes. Excuse the pun. ^hmf^

I think, we might just have the real deal here. 
I think the chances of this guy being satoshi are fairly small. However regardless of if Wright is in fact satoshi, Wright wants the world to believe that he is satoshi
legendary
Activity: 3542
Merit: 1965
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Inb4 Satoshi says "I am not Dr. Craig Steven Wright."
Too bad that Wright is deliberately trying to make it look like as if he is satoshi. For example in the YouTube video when he is asked who he is and what his involvement in Bitcoin is, Wright could have easily come up with a better answer if he wanted to hide the fact that he is satoshi (assuming he is in fact satoshi, which I doubt). He obviously knew well in advance that he would be speaking, and he could have just as easily said something to make it look like he is not satoshi (if that is what he wanted, against probably not the case).

His response rather indicate to me, someone who is undecided on the matter. He wants to say something, but something is holding him back. It could be one huge elaborate hoax or it could be the real deal. He is obviously VERY intelligent and very private, and he ticks most of the boxes. Excuse the pun. ^hmf^

I think, we might just have the real deal here. 
copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374
Inb4 Satoshi says "I am not Dr. Craig Steven Wright."
Too bad that Wright is deliberately trying to make it look like as if he is satoshi. For example in the YouTube video when he is asked who he is and what his involvement in Bitcoin is, Wright could have easily come up with a better answer if he wanted to hide the fact that he is satoshi (assuming he is in fact satoshi, which I doubt). He obviously knew well in advance that he would be speaking, and he could have just as easily said something to make it look like he is not satoshi (if that is what he wanted, against probably not the case).
legendary
Activity: 2282
Merit: 1041
I knew it! craig just want to get credits. tip my hat to satoshi for being anonymous! its not weird to have pricacy
hero member
Activity: 786
Merit: 1000
Inb4 Satoshi says "I am not Dr. Craig Steven Wright."

Wright brought this upon himself. I don't expect anything from Satoshi about this.

Good point.
member
Activity: 82
Merit: 26
Inb4 Satoshi says "I am not Dr. Craig Steven Wright."

Wright brought this upon himself. I don't expect anything from Satoshi about this.
hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 501
Well I actually took the time to read some of this and it seems they have a lot more evidence than last time. If it is really Dr Craig it would suck. It was cooler when the man was an unknown myth.
hero member
Activity: 786
Merit: 1000
Inb4 Satoshi says "I am not Dr. Craig Steven Wright."
member
Activity: 116
Merit: 10
IPSX: Distributed Network Layer
We have two negatives: Dorian Nakamoto denies he is Satoshi Nakamoto. Satoshi Nakamoto denies he is Dorian Nakamoto.
legendary
Activity: 2394
Merit: 1216
The revolution will be digital
There are some great comments on this conversation...

http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1zrshb/real_satoshi_nakamoto_denies_being_dorian_nakamoto/

Quote
Newsweek should have waited at least three confirmations before publishing their story.

Quote
They couldn't. They were trying to exploit "headline malleability."

Quote
We have two negatives: Dorian Nakamoto denies he is Satoshi Nakamoto. Satoshi Nakamoto denies he is Dorian Nakamoto.
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
I was actually half convinced the guy with a confused face (the old guy they followed into the entrance of his house) was the actual real deal acting confused, but I guess I was wrong and the mistery must go on.

Satoshi has been too good with opsec to make the kind of blatant mistake that would be required for that old guy to be Satoshi.
legendary
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
I was actually half convinced the guy with a confused face (the old guy they followed into the entrance of his house) was the actual real deal acting confused, but I guess I was wrong and the mistery must go on.
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
I'm not saying I am Satoshi Nakamoto, but think about it... have you ever seen me and Satoshi on this forum at the same time Huh?
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 502
if you really want to know who satoshi is...visit this sub-reddit.

http://www.reddit.com/r/satoshistories

legendary
Activity: 1442
Merit: 1000
Antifragile
I think you should probably review some of his professional writing before you decide that is the case.

Anyone can correct an email if given time. Satoshi's correspondences with Gavin and the team, were the ones Satoshi just "wrote" (more spontaneously) and those emails
that Dorian "just wrote", seem on another lower level.
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
I think you should probably review some of his professional writing before you decide that is the case.
legendary
Activity: 1442
Merit: 1000
Antifragile
I believe p2p message was Dorian himself, it felt desperate to me.
I thought it felt desperate too at first, don't ask me why. But I ultimately had to dismiss that feeling because of the fact that it was only 5 words.  Cool

the timing was desperate, he had no choice but to do it. It's obvious satoshi stayed away from posting anything despite so many storms hitting bitcoin all these years. But when they came to his turf (Dorian) he ran out of options and used all his arsenal.

To me right now Dorian is Satoshi, there is enough evidence proving he is Satoshi and not enough that he is not. If more evidence arises that Dorian is not Satoshi, then i will change my mind.

You are retarded.

Good job Leah, now a bunch of retards will forever think an old asian man who can't even type english very well created Bitcoin.

derp

The guy is a highly educated programmer that has worked on classified military projects in the past. Why do you think he can't communicate via written English very well?

lol

Because emails from him say as much.
Pages:
Jump to: