Topic: Satoshi never used bitcointalk: Craig Wrigth (Read 539 times)

Indeed. The only intention of Craig Wright is to become popular and famous to every crypto users because as the founder of BSV or Bitcoin SV he needs to promote his own coin to gain investors, that is why it doesn't matter to him if he can't convince us that he is the real Satoshi Nakamoto, as long he can advertise his own coin it is fine to him.

You guys are getting emotional. Even Craig Wright knows that he'll never be able to prove that he is Satoshi Nakamoto (because he is not the real Satoshi, as simple as that). His real intention is to sow seeds of doubt in the mind of cryptocurrency users, so that he can promote his shitcoin (Bitcoin SV) and get rich by triggering a pump-and-dump cycle for the BSV. If you remember, he already managed one cycle almost a year ago.

I guess some sort of streisand effect


I guess you're right...
Sorry for bringing it up then. Will lock a bit later

The courts are also tired of the things he is doing .
His funny accusations are not entertaining enough for the court anymore and they are going to file complain against him soon .
People have stopped taking him seriously , even if there was someone who used to respect him , now there are none.
One should understand that , if he is Satoshi he does not need to actually be this worked up about something that he was actually hiding since forever.
Just ignore him .

Use your time to do something useful. I've wasted enough of my own time to debunk his bullshit, don't waste yours too. Probably +50% of the words coming out of his mouth are plain BS.

This is why his lies find some ears to hear them...
Because he starts with true facts and then derails.

Satoshi did not use bitcointalk.org - that I can believe.

At first the forum was on bitcoin.org (bitcoin.org/smf and then forum.bitcoin.org)
Then it was moved to bitcointalk.org in 2011, so after satoshi disappeared

After that he claims that (and here he starts to derail) in the migration process satoshi's posts (his - cought-) were doctored by staff.

Says that archive sites can be doctored but used one of them (wayback machine) to make the same point.

I would love to actually see his every word debunked. So threads here will analyse and put to rest any lies he will spread.
Maybe it's time to fight the idiot monster, not lock him in the closet.

I used to think so too, and it's still a good idea to not create new threads about him, but at this point it's too late to try to ignore him since he got famous. If it was in the earlier stages of his "career", then ignoring him would be the best approach, but now we should focus on debunking him instead. This way newcomers will have higher chances to view his for what he is instead of accidentally joining his cult.

How about we stop giving him cheap publicity here Bitcoin enthusiast should learn to start ignoring him.
The guy is always looking for means to always to trend, reason why he is up in the game of formulating stories

Yeah, I don't think it's right to dismiss him. Newcomers are one thing, but there's actually a minority of quite old members of the forum that also believe that Craig in the true Satoshi. So it's really important not to make it seem that this is the opinion of the majority, and it might seem this way if we all just keep silent.
What this guy says is getting more and more ridiculous. And I can't believe he hasn't been sued yet for faking the evidence in front of the judge and not fulfilling the requirements of giving half of the Tulip Trust money to Kleiman's family.

Noobs getting scammed into Segwit, so what is the point?

Sure, you all want ppl who debunking that marked as scammers. Wtf

There doesn't seem to be any weight to CSW's claims anymore. Seeing how the dude literally transcended beyond liars and schemers, right now he's just doing it for the attention again since any news regarding him has been overshadowed by any other important world events that doesn't need him nor any of his presence. To think that most of satoshi's first instructions on bitcoin was found here on this very forum, alongside the fact that one the very first miners, Hal Finney himself used this forum to communicate with satoshi already seals CSW's case.

I was just going to write a thread about this and then I thought I should first look whether someone has done it before me and apparently yes

I'm honestly sorry to bump this thread again - I know there have been so many posts out here about CSW and I am sick of them just like you are. But I popped up the news about crypto and I found his blog post about this .. I think this is becoming too funny and idiotic already.

We've had CSW lie a gazillion times. We've had him forge documents in court. We've had him contradict himself X times. We've had him say Bitcoin forks stole his work and that BitcoinShitV is the real Satoshi vision, literally contradicting what Satoshi said Bitcoin should be. We've had enough, haven't we..? Well, apparently not.. CSW always has something to surprise us with

I'm not even sure what the hell to say anymore about it.. Let's analyze just a very little bit this blog post because I first laughed but now it's giving me a huge headache..

Below, all quotes you see are taken from his own blog (archived).

---

First of all, he said that "The Wayback Machine is not perfect, far from it, and it can be gamed". Exactly after these words, he gives us a few Wayback Machine links. Moreover, just a few paragraphs under this quote, he says the following:


Someone enlighten me. How do you say the Wayback Machine can be gamed and then show us "proof" of your own statements? If the Wayback Machine can be gamed, can't you "game it" to your own advantage, mr. Shit Wrong?

And now, going back to the first paragraph... "Satoshi (I) never used Bitcointalk." - Doesn't that mean that he has just proved we all have been right all this time and CSW is not our Satoshi?

The attempts to copyright any elements of Bitcoin was laughable

I just didn't expect that there were so many statements made by him but they were against the real Satoshi. Well, it's quite funny, when this forum started with Satoshi, and it became a number of founding accounts, and then he denied that he never used his Bitcointalk account. how cute. I don't think Satoshi will ever embarrass him.

Craig Wright always makes sensations, I get fed up of all the news related to Craigs Wright. Because of all the news related to him,
there is not a single truth that comes out of his mouth. All crypto communities cannot be affected by his words, because they have
a lot of strong evidence that shows that satoshi nakamoto has an account on the bitcointalk forum and was active in this forum.
So who was fooled by craig wright most newbies who are new to the world of cryptocurrency.

I guess if he continue repeating this, some may begin to believe him... especially those who have no real interest in Crypto and its principles.
People who have their mind fixed on the real thing will easily spot the lies/fakes.

Be suspicious when an admired inventor of open source/transparent tech all of a sudden becomes pro closed/opaque tech and start hating on the real thing. People who truely believe in open source will easily spot the contradiction. while those who are after money alone won't care that much.

haha, good point. i personally never click on such links because i believe we should never contribute to the traffic of such shitty sites that keep publishing garbage articles about a known scammer and knowingly or not help his scam.

If everyone would put this snob behind ignore button life would be more better than what we have. Good to hear and know that many still not ignored this. If Satoshi never used this Bitcointalk then who created this forum? and the one created before this?,  how come there's an account that bear the said name Satoshi?

Personally am not dumped and can't be one of them either because am just a different breeding. Stop acclaiming to yourself the glory of a good guy Craig Wrigth.

Another joke from the famous clown of crypto community.
Might as well tell as that Satoshi never have Bitcoin nor used it   .
We don't need to pay any attention to his claims we are aware that he is fake and would say anything he wants just to get attention.

There is a good thing here.
He makes us laugh.

Where can we contact him to just thank him for making some good jokes in times of crisis about the virus?
Perhaps we could also share some contribution for his medical needs and maybe a little help for paying his psychiatrists.